@FeralHSMom@AintGotaBrisket@Styve145@TPostMillennial You arent predicting anything, you are confirming what ive previously said and repeatedly demonstrating it.
Obviously you wont understand what all that means though
@FeralHSMom@AintGotaBrisket@Styve145@TPostMillennial No, i think people are stupid who cant comprehend this simple concept, like you.
Absolutely nowhere did i say there were no exemptions, you maxed out your mental capacity to get to this point, there is no further from here for you.
@LoxahatcheLady1@TPostMillennial I dont need to, you provided a link that you allegedly read and understood.
If you dont know where i got it from, you are a liar.
@LoxahatcheLady1@TPostMillennial I didnt answer your question because it is irrelevant.
Ill take it that you dont know the difference and dont understand that there is no requirement to enforce 80/20 and generally +55 places go for as close to 100% as possible.
@FeralHSMom@AintGotaBrisket@Styve145@TPostMillennial Again, your reading comprehension skills are embarrassing.
You are just sad at this point.
I just really hope you are trolling and not this actively stupid.
"Acres, who is herself under 55 but is permitted to live in the community because she resides with her mother, said she understands she would have to leave if her mother died."
Your brain does not function correctly.
Maybe you should have your carer read the article to you before going any further
The general rule is "over 55s" one of the exceptions is family members or carers.
Your point is idiotic and comes from a complete lack of understanding
@LoxahatcheLady1@TPostMillennial "A community that falls below the 80% threshold risks losing its legal age-restricted status."
Did you read and fully understand the link you shared?
@FeralHSMom@AintGotaBrisket@Styve145@TPostMillennial Yes... the rules stated individuals offering care to the over 55s are ok.
Now the man needing care has died, this removes the her ability to live there.
How fucking stupid are you?