Jezz

#ProEU #RejoinEU

[Magyar Péter (Ne féljetek) @magyarpeterMP]

80 days left. Onward to victory!❤️🤍💚

[Jay in Kyiv @JayinKyiv]

The most suppressed account on this platform is the candidate that is about to unseat Russian-backed kleptocrat Victor Orban.

Although polling 12 points above Putin's puppet party, on this platform Magyar needs your follows.

[Jezz @Jezzroo]

@MichaelRosenYes @Daisybelll @NotFarLeftAtAll @NIAbbot

[Steve Reed @SteveReedMP]

I will do whatever it takes to defend British democracy from foreign and hostile interference.

If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.

[Byline Times @BylineTimes]

🔴 EXCLUSIVE: Nigel Farage’s £9m Donor Profits From Putin Propaganda Platform While Holding MoD Stake

Reform UK’s biggest donor is profiting from ties to a pro-Kremlin platform that hosts a Russian intelligence-backed influence operation – @NafeezAhmed

https://t.co/OA33H8UNSx

[Jezz @Jezzroo]

@dave43law @RhonddaBryant Unfortunately, the Brexit referendum has been excluded.

[Dr David Nicholl @djnicholl]

@EdwardJDavey Yup, second on the list…Boris Johnson

https://t.co/NlDsHcSqfO

[Ed Davey @EdwardJDavey]

I'm glad Keir Starmer has listened to our calls for this inquiry following the Reform Russian bribery scandal.

Nigel Farage should be the first to give evidence.

[Jezz @Jezzroo]

@Stanley_Walker @David__Osland Absolute rubbish.

[Occupy Democrats @OccupyDemocrats]

BREAKING: Pulitzer Board turns the tables on Trump in defamation lawsuit — demands discovery of ALL his finances and medical records in explosive legal fight.

Donald Trump thought he could bully and intimidate the Pulitzer Prize Board into submission. Instead, the Board just hit back — hard.

According to a new report from Law & Crime, members of the Pulitzer Prize Board are fighting Trump’s lawsuit with sweeping discovery demands that could pry open one of his most closely guarded secrets: his finances. After Trump sued the Board for standing by Pulitzer-winning reporting on his links to Russia — reporting that he despises — the Board is now insisting that if Trump wants to litigate, he’s going to have to play by the rules — and answer uncomfortable questions under oath.

Trump’s lawsuit claims the Board defamed him by refusing to retract awards given to journalists whose reporting detailed his ties to Russia. But the Board isn’t backing down. Instead, its lawyers are demanding broad discovery, including documents and testimony that go directly to Trump’s wealth, business interests, medical history, and credibility — areas that have long proven hazardous terrain for the president.

In court filings, the Board argues that Trump himself made his finances relevant by repeatedly injecting claims about his success, reputation, and damages into the case. In other words: if Trump says the reporting hurt his standing, then the truth about his money matters — a lot.

Legal experts say this is a classic “be careful what you wish for” moment. Trump has spent years attacking journalists, institutions, and independent watchdogs, assuming intimidation would be enough. But discovery cuts both ways. If this case proceeds, Trump could be forced to turn over records he has spent decades concealing and sit for depositions that can’t be spun away with late-night rants on social media.

The Pulitzer Board’s message is unmistakable: they’re not afraid of Trump, and they’re not rewriting history because he doesn’t like it. The awards were granted, the reporting stands, and now Trump may have to answer — in a courtroom, not on Truth Social.

This legal counterpunch also exposes the deeper irony of Trump’s crusade. A man who claims to champion “free speech” is trying to punish journalists for doing their jobs — while crying victim when those journalists, and the institutions that defend them, refuse to cave.

If Trump thought this lawsuit would intimidate the press, it may end up doing the opposite. By opening the door to discovery into his finances and credibility, he’s handed his critics exactly what they’ve been asking for: accountability.

And this time, it won’t be decided by a rally crowd or a rage post — it’ll be decided under oath.

Please like and share if you can’t wait to see how this turns out!

[Nick Reeves #RejoinEU #NAFO #FBPE @nickreeves9876]

On September 16th, 2014, Farage and Nathan Gill made speeches in the European Parliament parroting the same Russian propaganda lies.

Could this have just been a coincidence? It seems unlikely.

Farage and Gill both used the expression "poking the Russian bear."

They both parroted Russian lies about NATO and EU expansion.

They both called Ukraine "The Ukraine," a term which refers back to the old Slavic word for borderland, which Russia uses to deny Ukraine's nationhood. Russia's basic justification for invading Ukraine, is that it is not a real country; that it is a fake nation, whose deluded Nazified inhabitants fail to recognise that they are Russian.

Farage and Gill both repeated the Russian claim that the real threat was Muslim extremism, a claim that Putin had very effectively used to distract Western leaders from Russian aggression and its hybrid war against the West. It's a tactic that Russia is still using via its Western tools.

The Reform UK leadership tried to pretend Farage had nothing more than a passing acquaintance with Gill, a claim that was soon exposed as a lie.

The Kremlin promoted Farage on Russian TV, doubtless hoping he would be of useful service to Russia. He has undoubtedly more than fulfilled their expectations.

Farage poses as a patriot, but the opposite is true. He has acted as the vehicle of hostile foreign interference in our politics.

[Prof. Michael Lewis 🌭 @Michael_g_Lewis]

@Parody_PM @ZiaYusufUK And 25% of their Country leaders are in jail for taking treasonous bribes #nathangill

[Ed Davey @EdwardJDavey]

Farage has been dismissing evidence of Russian ties to the Salisbury Novichok attack since 2018 🧐

[Planet Belfast @Planet_Belfast]

@EdwardJDavey Farage parroting Russian attack lines against Zelenskyy at yesterday's disastrous press conference. No wonder he and Nathan Gill were so friendly

[Parody Nigel Farage @Parody_PM]

My attendance record in the European Parliament was the 4th worst out of 751 MEPs, yet I managed to turn up to vote AGAINST plans to tackle Russian misinformation.
Thankfully this is of no interest to the media.

[Nick Reeves #RejoinEU #NAFO #FBPE @nickreeves9876]

Here's Farage parroting Russian propaganda lies that could have come straight out of Lavrov's mouth.

Are we really to believe that Nathan Gill, who spouted the same lies, is the only Russian asset in Reform UK?

[Ed Davey @EdwardJDavey]

Ukraine is on the brink of an historic betrayal by Trump to Putin.

Keir Starmer must bring our European allies together to back Zelensky, starting by seizing frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine.

[Carole Cadwalladr @carolecadwalla]

Gill is going down for 10.5 years but the bigger picture is that UK is still at risk.

@CarolineLucas has been fighting for an inquiry into Russian interference with @allthecitizens since 2020.

Why on earth would the govt deny an inquiry now?? What possible reason does it have?

[Ed Davey @EdwardJDavey]

Guilty as charged.

I wonder if @Nigel_Farage will be giving a press conference on this one?

[Nick Reeves #RejoinEU #NAFO #FBPE @nickreeves9876]

Here is Farage with Russian propagandist Nadia Sass, the wife of Nathan Gill's handler, Oleg Voloshyn,

And here is Farage in what appears to be Gill's office holding a "Leave and Let Die" T-shirt given to him by Sass, shown in a tweet by Sass, and reposted by her husband, Voloshyn.

And doesn't Farage look pleased with his gift.