@RodriguesAValve É uma estafa. Pagamos o exército de bombeiros todos os anos para isto, desde há 40 anos. E nada mudou na nossa floresta. No fundo é uma transferência de todo o nosso dinheiro para elas.
@RichardHanania They are also excluded from public debate. That is not good. They would not have some of these views if they could talk about it openly. This doesn't mean though that immigration is a taboo topic. It's a policy open to the decision by the people (not racism or exclusion obviously
@ChadsRcool Well, it's in the details. They want top men (whatever that means for them) hitting on them, not unskilled guys. But they will never say, because Hell forbid they ever being direct.
@LBC The problem is these "opinion makers" manufacturing consent. We need a real media, as they are the lens we use to see the world. Whenever I see these guys, I always remember V for Vendetta. We need new media. How to achieve that?!
@ProfCarlSagan Great argument as always. I'm afraid this kind of intelligence is less and less frequent. Entertainment, Internet, ai, ... We are getting less interesting by the minute.
@joaomaya2025 É importante perceber que a política de imigração é uma política como qq outra - pode-se discutir. Compete à população quantos imigrantes deixamos entrar. Recusar discutir isto é dar votos à extrema direita.
@J0N3SE@RealDonaldDoo If she really considered you a high quality partner, she would not do anything do displease you. It's their way of communicating.
@J0N3SE@RealDonaldDoo That's her way of saying you are doing something that she doesn't respect. Actually, if she is contradicting you (=not respecting you) you shouldn't have entered the relationship. She would then respect you for keeping her in line.