Trump's financial disclosure from June 2025 also lists these Venezuela-based trademarks, registered with the Servicio Autónomo de la Propiedad Intelectual in Caracas.
Anyone else find it odd that the President possessed "intellectual property" -- from which income can presumably be derived -- in a country he'd otherwise imposed with massive sanctions, so as to cut it off from the US and international banking system? And which he subsequently bombed, abducted the leader of, and then declared himself the new supreme governing authority
There was a multi-year campaign by Republicans, the media and the podcast manosphere to find some sort of corruption, ANYTHING on Hunter (and Joe Biden). Joe Rogan did entire episodes on it. In the end, all they came up with was that he got a job he was under-qualified for.
Meanwhile, Trump is doing the most brazen, unprecedented corruption on a massive scale and it gets reported on by the MSM one time and then everyone moves on. All the people who were obsessed with HUNTER BIDEN CORRUPTION (like Rogan and Glenn Greenwald) won't even mention it.
Unbelievably depressing.
PabloReports: How do House Republicans make the case that you're fighting for affordability when you go back to your districts?
Nehls: Affordability? What are you talking about? I'm gonna go there tomorrow. I'm gonna get me a couple of big lobster tails. I'm gonna get me some nice rib eyes.
Reporter: Do you think the 60% of Americans living paycheck to paycheck can afford lobster tails and rib eyes and all of that?
Nehls: Maybe not. Maybe the 60% of Americans don't work as hard as I do.
House GOP out here cutting ads for Dems:
NEHLS: Affordability? What are you talking about? I'm gonna go there tomorrow. I'm gonna get me a couple of big lobster tails. I'm gonna get me some nice ribeyes.
MT: Do you think the 60% of Americans living paycheck to paycheck can afford lobster tails and rib eyes and all of that?
NEHLS: Maybe not. Maybe the 60% of Americans don't work as hard as I do.
They have NO IDEA what’s coming in November.
I want everyone to take a moment and put into historical timeline context what this post tried to do here.
I want you to teleport 100 years into the future, and the 2126 SCOTUS makes some ruling.
And as an argument against the ruling someone cites as precedent a 2026 floor debate speech by Lauren fucking Boebert.
Not the text of the Constitution, not past SCOTUS rulings, but some opinion by a member of Congress.
That's what the John Birch Society social media account just tried to do.
@Risotto_King@EvanAKilgore My party? I dont align with dems on most things. I align with the rule of law and the constitution. Trump and a majority of Democrats and Republicans have been trampling on it and undermining the rule of law.
Even if you agree with Trump on birthright citizenship (I do not), you should be happy that the Constitution cannot be undone via executive order.
There was over 100 years of precedent decisions defending birthright citizenship.
You shouldn't be disappointed that you can't sidestep a constitutional amendment via executive order.
I will also contact my elected representatives and urge them to oppose your amendment and urge others to do the same.
Hilarious watching "constitionalists" crash out over US born citizens legally voting on election day.
Insane how much their minds have been warped by propaganda.
@sharper_23@ktay5dog@BasedMikeLee Keep coping and seething bud. Imagine getting butt hurt over aligning with the constitution.
You are a un-American, uneducated piece of trash.