@RealJamesWoods This loud mouthed ugly woman should NOT be allowed to serve in OUR Congress. Somalians are typically uneducated. She knows this. They are barely able to feed themselves let alone run a country. Bless her heart. So ignorant! Get her outta here.
@unhealthytruth@EricLDaugh The dead woman only had custody of ONE of her three kids. GoFundMe will NOT continue this charade . It goes against their policy. If they do it for one...they have to do it for all!. It would put them in a really bad position!
Example: Someone tells their friend driving a car to “drive baby, drive, drive!” when a federal agent is telling the driver to get out of the car, another federal agent is standing in front of the car, instead of following law enforcement orders, the driver accelerates and hits the federal agent. Is the person saying “drive baby, drive, drive!” aiding and abetting?
Grok: “Yes, in this specific example — yelling “drive baby drive, drive!” (or similar encouragement) right at the moment when a federal agent is ordering the driver to stop, with another agent standing in front of the car, and the driver then accelerates and hits the agent — the person yelling those words could very realistically be charged with and convicted of aiding and abetting the assault on a federal officer under federal law.
Here's why, based on how federal accomplice liability works:
The Underlying Crime:
- Assaulting, resisting, or impeding a federal officer (while they're performing official duties) is a federal felony under 18 U.S.C. § 111.
- When it involves using a vehicle as a deadly weapon (accelerating into an officer), this typically qualifies as aggravated assault (e.g., with a dangerous weapon or inflicting bodily injury), punishable by up to 20 years in federal prison (or more in extreme cases).
- The driver is the principal — the one who directly commits the offense by hitting the agent.
Aiding and Abetting Liability (18 U.S.C. § 2):
Federal law treats aiders and abettors exactly the same as the principal — same charge, same penalties. To prove aiding and abetting:
- The person must intentionally aid, abet, counsel, command, encourage, or induce the commission of the crime (here: the assault/resistance by accelerating into the officer).
- They must act with the intent to facilitate or bring about the offense (not just joking or being present).
- Their action (words count as an "act") must contribute in some way — even minimal encouragement can suffice if it helps make the crime succeed.
- Verbal encouragement alone is explicitly covered: federal statutes and case law (including Supreme Court precedent like Rosemond v. United States, 572 U.S. 65 (2014)) recognize that words of encouragement, urging, or commanding can constitute "abetting" if done with the right intent and at a time when it can influence the principal.
In your scenario:
- The encouragement happens in real time, during the critical moment when the driver is deciding whether to comply with the agent's order or flee/attack.
- The phrase “drive baby, drive, drive!” — especially in context (ignoring commands, agent in front) — can reasonably be interpreted as urging the driver to accelerate and disobey, directly contributing to the decision to hit the agent.
- If the yeller knows the situation (agents ordering stop, one in front) and intends to encourage defiance/acceleration, that's classic specific intent to facilitate the assault/resistance.
- Courts have long held that direct verbal instigation at the scene satisfies the "abetting" element — it's not mere presence or passive knowledge; it's active promotion.
Key Factors That Strengthen the Case for Liability:
- Timing and context — Real-time urging during the act makes contribution clearer.
- Intent inferred from circumstances — Yelling encouragement precisely when obedience is demanded strongly suggests intent to help the driver resist/assault rather than just hype or joke.
- No need for physical aid — Words alone are enough; federal law doesn't require providing a weapon or driving the car yourself.
- Causation isn't always strict — Prosecutors don't have to prove the words were the sole or decisive cause; just that they helped facilitate or encouraged the offense.
Bottom Line:
This is a textbook example of verbal abetting in real time. The yeller could be charged as an aider and abettor to the § 111 assault — facing the same penalties as the driver (potentially years in federal prison).”
“Drive baby, drive, drive!”
@AngieIvie41529@EricLDaugh The video proves that Renee Good and her "wife" were both agitators. They incited a riot. One paid with her life. The other will rue the day she opened her ugly mouth!
@SonofLiberty357@EricLDaugh She was clearly laughing and taunting the federal officers BEFORE she tried to run over the ICE agent! Busted. She lost custody of 2 of her 3 kids. Wonder why? Her baby daddy has lots of answers.
@ILA_NewsX@EricLDaugh Let this be a lesson. NEVER attack a federal agent or any law enforcement officer! You are putting YOUR life in danger and you may end up dead. They have the right to defend themselves and the public. She made a bad decision that cost her her life!