@Pastabowl26@ZeeToTheHill "Oh sweetie" was your condescending comment to me. Pretending you don't know your own words is a weak attempt to dodge the point. You admitted following the literal text makes people "unhappy," which means you agree with Parker. Thanks for the win. Logging out. Bye bye.
@OkieDad918@ZeeToTheHill As a former GOP, I’ll gladly correct a wording slip: Kirk didn't say "good luck," he ranted & name-called. But he still spent massive airtime reacting to her & explicitly admitted her structural analysis was correct. The data stands, but I’m done with trolls. Logging out. Bye bye
@SoeyJ42416@ZeeToTheHill Denying it won't change the tape or IRS Form 990s. TPUSA is an $80M+ donor-funded digital media house built entirely on farming short-form vertical campus clips for views. Parker was live in person holding a mic. Calling facts a delusion is just pure coping. Be better bro.
@TheBeego@ZeeToTheHill Calling it "just capitalization" is wild. TPUSA is an $80M+ donor-funded digital media machine, not a grassroots club. Slicing up edited, viral clips of unprepared freshmen was their literal business model for fundraising. He didn't invest in them; he used them for clout.
@Jdp227@ZeeToTheHill As an atheist, your argument proves my point. If an all-powerful God had to wait for human hearts to "evolve" past his own explicit laws allowing chattel slavery, then human morality is superior to the Bible. An absolute moral code shouldn't lag behind human progress.
@Jdp227@ZeeToTheHill As an atheist, I don't "pervert" the text; I just read it. Leviticus 25 explicitly says you can buy foreigners as permanent property and inherit them. Calling literal scripture a "perversion" is just a cop-out because you can’t reconcile an unchanging God with chattel slavery.
@Pastabowl26@ZeeToTheHill Condescending names don't change the text. Charlie Kirk claimed biblical morality is absolute. If following the full Bible would make people "unhappy," you're admitting its laws are morally outdated. Thanks for proving my point.
@OkieDad918@ZeeToTheHill Charlie name-calling her on air isn’t proof he ignored her—it’s proof he gave her massive free advertising because her data on TPUSA's fake chapters rattled his team. Conceding she was right about structural organizing is an admission. Your petty name-calling is pure cope.
@Jdp227@ZeeToTheHill If the text "led to abolition," why did the American South use those exact verses in Leviticus and Exodus to legally justify chattel slavery for centuries? Pro-slavery pastors cited the Bible because the text explicitly permits ownership. History completely debunks your claim.
@JustinCasedlro@ZeeToTheHill Cis- is a real Latin prefix meaning "on this side of," the direct scientific opposite of trans-. It’s used in chemistry, geography, & medicine. Both the Oxford & Merriam-Webster dictionaries officially added "cisgender" a decade ago. It’s literal English, look it up.
@Pastabowl26@ZeeToTheHill It matters because Charlie’s entire brand is built on the claim of absolute, objective biblical morality. If the text explicitly permits keeping humans as inheritable property, that claim falls apart. You can't say he "has no point" and then ask why the facts matter.
@OkieDad918@ZeeToTheHill Calling her "Temu Charlie" was his coping mechanism because her data rattled him. He ranted about her on air constantly, giving her massive free ads. Zee didn't disrupt events; she exposed TPUSA's waste and fake chapters with receipts. The tape proves he was terrified. Do better.
@JustinCasedlro@ZeeToTheHill Imagine being so completely desperate to find an insult that you literally have to invent a fake identity for someone. Zee is a cis woman. This wild hallucination just proves you have absolutely zero real arguments against her data. Stick to the facts.
@Jdp227@ZeeToTheHill Pivoting to Hebrew vocabulary isn’t answering the question; it’s an evasion. Parker asked how verses explicitly permitting human beings to be kept as permanent, inheritable property fit into objective morality. Charlie changed the topic because the text didn't back him up.
@OkieDad918@ZeeToTheHill Shifting the goalposts because your sexism got called out? Zee isn't "debating a memory." Charlie Kirk himself literally praised Zee on camera, said her campus data was on to something, and wished her luck. She’s exposing TPUSA's infrastructure. Keep coping.
@RottenEggSack@ZeeToTheHill times just to get through a sentence, you're the one wasting time. Demanding a public figure answer for literal scripture isn't "bad faith"—it's baseline accountability. Charlie got out-argued on camera, and no amount of typos changes that.
@LeslieHipps@ZeeToTheHill Leaving a vulgar temper tantrum about someone’s voice just proves you are completely incapable of refuting her actual data or evidence. Sane people look at the facts; trolls just scream insults when they know their side lost the argument. Cry harder.
@Pastabowl26@ZeeToTheHill Parker’s point was literal scripture: Leviticus 25 and Exodus 21. His point was that the text explicitly permits buying human beings as permanent property and passing them down as an inheritance. If that’s "no point," you are ignoring the plain text of the book.