Silent

[Silent @JJpiwu]

@NWFAISP28 @Ash_Bash_70 @Jvnior

[Silent @JJpiwu]

Nobody said massacres of Jews were fake, and nobody said every Palestinian claim is automatically true.

The October 7 attacks were real. UN reporting documents the killing of Israeli civilians and the taking of hostages by Hamas and other armed groups.

But that doesn’t logically mean every report of Palestinian civilian deaths is fake either. The UN’s OCHA explains that its casualty database uses field investigations and normally requires at least two independent, reliable sources before incidents are entered.

So the argument isn’t “believe Al Jazeera because it’s Al Jazeera.” It’s “look at evidence from multiple independent sources and verify specific claims.”

You can condemn Hamas’s attacks on Israeli civilians while also acknowledging Palestinian civilians who were killed or harmed. Those positions aren’t contradictory.

If your argument is that one side’s victims are real and the other side’s victims are automatically propaganda, that’s not skepticism—it’s applying two completely different standards of evidence

[Silent @JJpiwu]

“Heaven is real, Hell is hot, Muhammad is dead, Jesus is not” isn’t an argument—it’s a list of beliefs and a conclusion.

Muslims also believe in Heaven and Hell. Muslims also believe Jesus is the Messiah and that he was not merely an ordinary human. The actual disagreement is over what happened to Jesus and what that means about his nature.

And “Muhammad is dead” doesn’t prove Jesus is God. Muslims have never claimed Muhammad was immortal or divine. A prophet dying is completely compatible with Islam.

If you want to establish that Jesus is God, you still need to demonstrate it from your evidence. Saying “Jesus is not dead” doesn’t automatically establish divinity.

So if we’re debating theology, let’s debate theology—not slogans.

Good night. 😂 lil man don’t forget your warm cup of milk

[Silent @JJpiwu]

“Jesus being God in the flesh” is your Christian doctrine, not what Genesis 1:26 actually says.

Genesis says, “Let us make mankind in our image,” but it never says “the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit,” never mentions Jesus, and never says that humanity was created in anticipation of God becoming a man.

You can’t take a doctrine developed elsewhere in the Bible and pretend Genesis 1:26 explicitly states it. That’s interpretation, not quotation.

And “100% God and 100% man” doesn’t solve the argument either—it simply states the doctrine you’re trying to prove.

So if your entire argument is:
“Genesis says image → therefore Jesus is God → therefore the Trinity,”
you’ve skipped the actual evidence for every step.

And calling me “Mr. Mohammedan” over and over doesn’t strengthen your theology. It just shows you’ve run out of arguments.

Now THAT is a good night. 😂

[Silent @JJpiwu]

You spent all that time calling me “Mohammedan,” repeating accusations, and insulting Muhammad, yet somehow still haven’t addressed the actual theological argument.

Calling Muhammad names isn’t evidence. Calling Jesus God isn’t evidence. A meme definitely isn’t evidence. If your position is that Jesus is God, then make the biblical case for it instead of substituting insults for an argument.

And “Mohammedan” still doesn’t become correct simply because you keep repeating it. Muslims worship Allah, not Muhammad. That’s basic Islamic theology.

So if your final contribution to the debate is “my meme is truth,” I think we’ve reached the natural conclusion here.

Good night 😂 Sleep well—you’ll need a better argument tomorrow.

[Silent @JJpiwu]

You keep repeating “God has an image” as if Genesis says God has a physical body. It doesn’t.

Genesis 1:26–27 says humanity was made “in our image” and “in our likeness,” but it never says that this means humans physically look like God’s body.

And here’s the part you’re overlooking: your own New Testament says, “God is spirit” (John 4:24).

So if you’re arguing that God must have a physical image because Genesis uses the word “image,” you’d first have to prove that “image” means physical appearance rather than likeness, representation, or attributes.

Also, Genesis 1:26 does NOT say “Father, Son and Holy Spirit.” That’s your theological interpretation being inserted into the verse. The actual text says “our image” and then immediately describes humanity as male and female.

So the argument isn’t “Islam disproved Genesis.” The problem is that you’re taking one word, assigning it a meaning the verse itself doesn’t explicitly give, and then treating your interpretation as if the text literally stated it.

Quote the verse all you want. The verse still doesn’t say what you’re claiming it says.

[Silent @JJpiwu]

@WulferPWI @NWFAISP28 @Ash_Bash_70 @Jvnior There were also 200 Palestinians killed in the West Bank by Israeli forces or settlers between January 1 and October 6, 2023—before October 7—according to an OHCHR report

[Silent @JJpiwu]

@NWFAISP28 @Ash_Bash_70 @Jvnior That’s not a journalist 😭 and we’re really using Google 😭

[Silent @JJpiwu]

You just proved my point without realizing it.

Yes, “Mohammedan” is historically derived from forms of Muhammad’s name. Nobody is disputing the etymology. The problem is the conclusion you’re trying to draw from it.

Muslims have traditionally called themselves Muslims, not “Mohammedans,” because Islam teaches that Muhammad is a prophet, not someone Muslims worship. Calling Muslims “Mohammedans” therefore incorrectly suggests that Islam is centered on worshipping Muhammad.

And your own explanation doesn’t establish otherwise. Saying a term existed in Medieval Latin or appeared in English centuries ago tells us where the word came from—not what Muslims believe.

So congratulations: you established the origin of a word, then somehow treated that as evidence about Islamic theology. Those are two completely different arguments.

If you want to debate Islam, debate what Muslims actually believe—not a label you found in a history book

[Silent @JJpiwu]

You’re making several assumptions and presenting them as if Genesis itself explicitly teaches the Trinity. Genesis 1:26 says, “Let us make mankind in our image,” but the verse itself does not say “Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.” That is a theological interpretation developed from the broader Christian doctrine of the Trinity, not a direct statement of the verse.

And saying “your God has no image, so He isn’t God” doesn’t follow. Islam explicitly teaches that Allah is unlike creation and cannot be reduced to a physical image. A Creator not having a created physical form is not a contradiction.

As for “the Bible is corrupted” — Muslims don’t need to pretend the Bible says something it doesn’t. The Qur’an presents itself as confirming and correcting previous revelation, while Christians interpret the biblical texts differently. That disagreement is exactly what needs to be debated, not settled by “LMAO.”

So if your argument depends on Genesis 1:26 proving the Trinity, actually demonstrate how the verse explicitly says Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Quoting one verse and attaching your theology to

[Silent @JJpiwu]

@NWFAISP28 @Ash_Bash_70 @Jvnior Lmao 😂 please give me the facts and major details from a trusted journalist

[Silent @JJpiwu]

@RealSportReview @MyMsmIsland @NicoRobin_XYZ Why did you tag me? 😭

[Silent @JJpiwu]

@NWFAISP28 @Ash_Bash_70 @Jvnior Are those backed up by true claims and major journalists not FOX News fake ass news

[Silent @JJpiwu]

That argument collapses at the first sentence.

“If Allah isn’t Satan, then Muhammad is Allah” is a completely unsupported false dichotomy. Islam explicitly teaches the opposite: Allah is God, and Muhammad is His messenger and servant. Muslims do not worship oo

And “Mohammedan” doesn’t prove your point either. A religion’s name being used historically by outsiders doesn’t establish what its followers actually believe. Christians don’t worship Christ merely because the word “Christian” refers to Christ.

You’re arguing from a label instead of the actual theology. If you want to criticize Islam, at least argue against what Muslims actually believe—not a position Islam explicitly rejects.

So before you tell me to “ponder,” ponder the premise you built your entire argument on. 😭

[Silent @JJpiwu]

Calling me a “Mohammedan” while claiming I’m predictable doesn’t strengthen your argument—it just shows you’re arguing with a label instead of addressing what I actually said. And for the record, my name is Andrew, not whatever you’ve decided to call me.

As for your claim: saying “Jesus is the God of Abraham” is a Christian theological claim, not a fact that Christianity gets to impose on Islam. Islam explicitly teaches that Allah is the one God worshipped by Abraham, and that Jesus is the Messiah and a prophet—not God Himself.

And the argument that Allah must have a creator because He created everything misunderstands the Islamic position. In Islam, Allah is understood as the uncreated Creator; saying “everything needs a creator” and then demanding a creator for Allah is an obvious category error. The claim is that created things require a cause—not that the necessary, uncreated Creator does.

If you want to debate theology, debate the actual beliefs I hold. Don’t invent a position for me, slap a label on me, and then congratulate yourself for defeating it.

[Silent @JJpiwu]

❤️FAITH IN HUMANITY IS RUNNING LOW❤️

Some of the things people say online honestly make me lose faith in humanity for a moment.

It’s crazy how people will say anything because they feel safe behind a screen. Some of the things I see on X are genuinely heartbreaking.

It’s sad seeing where the world is heading sometimes. I hope one day we can all live together in peace, respect one another, and accept that we’re going to have differences — especially when it comes to religion, beliefs, and culture.

We don’t have to think alike, believe the same things, or come from the same place. But we can choose to be kind. Before you hit “post,” remember there’s a real person on the other side of that screen. Let’s make the internet — and the world — a little more respectful, one conversation at a time. ❤️🌍

[Silent @JJpiwu]

First, Muslims absolutely believe in the God of Abraham. The Qur’an explicitly says Muslims believe in what was revealed to Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and the other prophets, and calls Abraham’s God ‘one God.’

Second, saying ‘Islam denies the resurrection’ is simply false. Islam teaches that Jesus was raised by God and that humanity will face resurrection and judgment. Qur’an 3:55 explicitly describes Allah raising Jesus, while 4:157 gives the Islamic position that Jesus was not killed or crucified.

Third, you can disagree with Islam’s interpretation of Jesus without pretending Muslims have no theological basis. Your conclusion only follows if someone already accepts the Christian account of Jesus’ crucifixion and divinity. That is the very point being debated.

And ironically, your own Bible says Jesus appealed to Moses and described God as the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob when discussing resurrection (Mark 12:26–27).

So if you want to argue Christianity vs. Islam, argue the actual theological differences. Calling Islam ‘the Antichrist’ and declaring it has ‘no credibility’ isn’t an argument—it’s just an assertion.”

[Silent @JJpiwu]

@GreeenMarine @Ash_Bash_70 @Jvnior Please find me some proof not what you think

[Silent @JJpiwu]

@nadaa01012 Yes

[Silent @JJpiwu]

@GERCEK_BU_2 Forcing them to say stuff is crazy