@BBCR4Sunday@MichaelRosenYes In 2009 I wrote a piece in the Quarterly Journal of Medicine, parallel to my weekly column in the BMJ, "When I Use a Word", titled "Words misheard—medical mondegreens". https://t.co/kNZKFfO1rC I should be interested to learn more medical examples.
Congratulations to Georgia @Richards_G_C on being awarded an Open Data Institute Fellowship. This is related to her work on the hugely successful Preventable Deaths Tracker at https://t.co/MK4iTx0eRT.
66 medically related anniversaries in 2023:
1. 1123--Foundation of the Augustine Priory of St Bartholomew by Rahere, a prebendary of St Paul's Cathedral; this was the start of what eventually became the site of St Bartholomew's Hospital.
@NathanMackBrown The knee-jerk reaction to this is "Yes"--the price is far too high. But the problem is complex. What are the possible unintended consequences? E.g. should weathy countries not be subsidizing MLI countries? How can a fair price be set so that everyone can afford the treatment?
@RichardLehman1 I think that Bamber Gascoigne revelled in his middle name, an old family name. There is, incidentally, an essay by Charles Lamb, "Christ's Hospital Five-and-Thirty Years Ago" (see "Essays of Elia", 1823), in which he mentioned "Old Bamber Gascoigne". https://t.co/ioCRdfPcLc
@carlheneghan Why does the EMA define this as a "safety signal"? The definition doesn't say that a medicine is safe but that it may cause harm. The international definition of a signal in pharmacovigilance is below (https://t.co/MnrGCgB9FH):
Clinical pharmacology. The current number of UK clinical pharmacologists is under 25% of the number that the RCP estimated as necessary in its 2015 report https://t.co/RVGDrNITGV. All doctors need to know how to prescribe medicines to maximize benefits and minimize harms.
Had 120+ great responses to this question before but I believe in data supersaturation.
WHAT DO YOU THINK MED SCHOOL STUDENTS SHOULD BE LEARNING THAT THEY AREN'T TAUGHT PROPERLY NOW?
I don't think it's as simple as that, Renee. We are told that we need 70-80% immunity to prevent further spread, and vaccination may be only 90% effective. Measles vaccination below the necessary 95% or so has been disastrous. Should we not encourage vaccination, if possible?
If someone chooses not to have a vaccine then they are assessing their own risk and deciding they will take their chance. That decision is theirs and doesn't affect anyone who has decided to have the vaccine; they are protected. This message is not getting across sadly.
The Early Career Clinical Pharmacology Abstract Competition is for Medical Students, Junior Doctors (FY1, FY2, IMT1, IMT2), Pre-registration Pharmacists, and Pharmacists up to 2 years after qualification. Deadline for entries 5 July 2021. Entry details at https://t.co/6alTNPQ3jf
Here's preprint evidence that CD4/8 T cell responses are similar in response to different variants of SARS-CoV2 (UK, SA, Brazil, CAL) and to mRNA vaccines. It's not just about antibodies. https://t.co/PiXPKKZBq6; https://t.co/Dp9G9Z3wgi