JKjustys

Entrepreneur | Business & strategy-driven | Independent thinker, anti-woke, pro-reason | Building, innovating, and challenging the status quo.

[JKjustys @JKjustys]

@CollinRugg Don, you need God in your life. Take a hard look at your soul, maybe then you can turn things around from the sad, empty path you’ve chosen.

[Jasmin Laine @JasminLaine]

BREAKING NEWS: There’s NO 25% tariffs on the Auto industry in Canada.

USMCA is exempt & they need to set up a process to find non-USMCA parts before they even implement any tariffs at all.

[JKjustys @JKjustys]

Canada’s Dairy Cartel
A Quiet Dictatorship Hidden in Your Fridge!

Milk. It’s the most basic grocery staple, found in every Canadian home. But behind that innocent milk carton or (a bag )lies a rigged system that quietly drains your wallet while enriching a protected elite. The Canadian government’s control of the milk industry through a tightly guarded system known as supply management is one of the most underreported scandals in our so-called free market economy.

This system, which restricts how much milk farmers can produce and slaps massive tariffs on foreign dairy, isn’t about food safety or national pride. It’s about protecting profits for a small group of well-connected producers who hold dairy quotas worth millions, while the rest of us pay the price .. literally.

Every Canadian, regardless of income, is forced to pay marked-up prices for milk, cheese, and butter. Why? Because true market competition has been crushed. Cheaper international dairy products are locked out by import tariffs that can soar beyond 300%, all to shield a few thousand farms from market forces.

And who benefits? Certainly not young families trying to stretch grocery budgets, or newcomers trying to build a life in a country where food prices are already out of control. No, the winners here are the quota-holders, those fortunate enough to be inside the circle of protection, sitting atop an artificially inflated empire.

Worse yet, this system is shrouded in secrecy, political silence, and backroom lobbying. Try to bring it up in Parliament and you’ll quickly feel the heat from the dairy lobby. Political parties tiptoe around it. Elections are fought and won in key dairy regions like Quebec and Ontario, where even a whisper of reform could cost crucial seats. This isn’t democracy, it’s economic censorship.

Canada touts itself as a land of opportunity, innovation, and fairness. But when it comes to dairy, we’re living under a quiet, hidden dictatorship, where policy is written not for the many, but for the powerful few. A cartel cloaked in bureaucracy, funded by your grocery bill, and defended by a system too afraid to tell you the truth.

It’s time to break the silence. To demand transparency. To ask: Why are Canadians being forced to overpay for milk while the rest of the world moves toward free and fair markets?

This isn’t just about dairy. It’s about who really holds power in Canada and who’s paying for it.

[JKjustys @JKjustys]

Canada isn’t a communist country…
But when the government controls your milk, booze, flights, healthcare, and even what you watch online…
You have to ask:

Is this still capitalism — or quiet central planning?

[JKjustys @JKjustys]

@JustJenRX Romeo & Juliet 2025

[JKjustys @JKjustys]

Eliminating gas heating in Canada is insanity!

We live in one of the coldest countries on Earth. Natural gas is affordable, reliable, and keeps people alive in -40°C.
Pushing electric only heat in a country where heat pumps freeze up and the grid is already strained?

This isn’t climate action. It’s climate extremism.
It risks blackouts, skyrocketing bills, and freezing homes all for globalist virtue points.

Canada needs realism, not reckless ideology.

[JKjustys @JKjustys]

Climate Action Plan is not just about reducing emissions, it is a global economic weapon designed to reshape industries, control energy, and shift financial power.
Rather than being a purely environmental initiative, these policies represent a silent, strategic realignment of global power, forcing the world to comply with a system that ultimately benefits a select group of political and financial elites.

[JKjustys @JKjustys]

@MarioNawfal 🫣

[JKjustys @JKjustys]

@jkenney That’s what net-zero does to countries!

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

"The goal... is not to save the planet... It's about enslaving humanity."

Journalist Alex Newman exposes a 2013 UN report labelling meat, chicken and traditional farming as "unsustainable", and calling for a "major propaganda campaign" to normalise insect consumption instead.

"So how are they gonna get people to eat bugs? Well, a combination of propaganda, indoctrinating children and making you very, very hungry."

"The goal, folks, is not to save the planet. It's not about global warming. It's not about sustainable development. It's about enslaving humanity."

"They want to wipe out small and medium sized producers, centralise food control in the hands of mega corporations in bed with the mega governments."

"They want to move the population into the mega cities, and ultimately bring about this Great Reset and what they call the New World Order."

Credit: @ALEXNEWMAN_JOU

[JKjustys @JKjustys]

@BehizyTweets Is this AI generated? It can’t be real!

[JKjustys @JKjustys]

@ryangerritsen If Canada dominates Arctic green energy projects (hydrogen, wind farms, rare minerals), Carney’s allies in global banking and finance would profit massively.

[JKjustys @JKjustys]

@TaraBull808 This women should not be allowed near children.

[JKjustys @JKjustys]

@MaximeBernier By forcing net-zero policies onto the world, energy-deficient nations gain an upper hand, while oil-producing nations are coerced into limiting their own wealth and resources.

[Maxime Bernier @MaximeBernier]

Carney and Poilievre are both obsessed with the carbon tax and with costly measures to reduce CO2, which they call “pollution” even though it is necessary for life and what you exhale when you breathe. They are both out-of-touch globalists!

Carney has suspended the carbon tax that consumers pay, but he wants to increase the carbon tax that industries pay.

Poilievre wants to “axe the carbon tax” for both consumers and industries, but replace it with subsidies and tax credits to industries that reduce CO2.

I want to withdraw from the Paris Climate Accord and axe ALL taxes, regulations and subsidies related to climate alarmism.

And MY priorities are to:

-Stop mass immigration, the cult of diversity, and the balkanisation of our society, and instead protect our identity and culture

-Stop wokism and gender ideology

-Stop sending money to Ukraine, the UN, and other countries

-Stop big spending and inflation, and downsize government and reduce taxes instead

-Reach a fair deal with Trump, diversify our trade relations, and allow our natural resources industries to grow

[JKjustys @JKjustys]

How about Mr. Burns actually speaks to tCanadian people by truly introducing himself, his background, and his family? Canadians deserve to know who is leading them, yet he remains distant, avoiding direct engagement. His entire approach feels cold, dismissive, and hostile, as if he has no interest in connecting with the very citizens he represents. Leadership should be about transparency and accountability, not secrecy and detachment.

[JKjustys @JKjustys]

@CatchUpFeed GOT

[JKjustys @JKjustys]

@jkenney Why is the interviewer constantly interrupting and not letting the President speak? This seems to be happening more often with reporters—whenever they dislike the answer, they talk over the response. So unprofessional!

[JKjustys @JKjustys]

Who is Really Behind the Net-Zero Agenda?

The most aggressive proponents of net-zero policies are nations that lack substantial oil and gas reserves. These include:
•Germany – Once a powerhouse in coal and nuclear energy, it has aggressively shut down fossil fuel plants while pushing renewables, despite energy crises.
•France – Pioneering net-zero commitments while heavily reliant on nuclear power to reduce its energy vulnerability.
•United Kingdom – A former oil-producing power that is rapidly shifting towards wind and solar while implementing carbon taxes.

These nations are not leading the charge because of an inherent climate emergency but rather because they are economically and strategically dependent on foreign fossil fuels. The shift to green energy is as much about escaping reliance on oil-rich nations as it is about reducing carbon emissions.

Net-zero policies are crippling oil-rich economies, forcing them to comply with climate-driven regulations that weaken their energy dominance. The most impacted nations include:
•Canada – A major oil producer, yet aggressively limiting its own industry under pressure from global climate policies.
•Saudi Arabia ��� Forced to adopt “green energy” investments while still supplying global demand.
•Russia – A key energy exporter facing economic sanctions and climate restrictions that benefit Western nations.

By forcing net-zero policies onto the world, energy-deficient nations gain an upper hand, while oil-producing nations are coerced into limiting their own wealth and resources.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) has positioned itself as the global leader in climate change policy, yet its agenda benefits a select few. Through initiatives like “The Great Reset”, the WEF pushes for global control over energy, finance, and economies. The transition to net-zero allows unelected bureaucrats and corporate elites to dictate how nations produce, consume, and access energy.

Mark Carney, former governor of the Bank of Canada and Bank of England, is one of the chief architects of global climate finance. As the UN’s Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance, he is actively pressuring banks, businesses, and governments to defund fossil fuels while promoting “green finance” initiatives. Pressured financial institutions to cut funding for oil and gas projects.
Advocated for “carbon taxes” that increase costs for industries and consumers.
Created investment barriers for fossil fuel development, artificially inflating renewable energy markets.His role suggests that net-zero is less about protecting the environment and more about controlling global energy flows through financial instruments.

While net-zero policies dominate globaly, real-world environmental crises often receive less attention. Instead of focusing on immediate ecological concerns,the narrative revolves around carbon credits, green bonds, and regulatory control.

Why is climate activism so focused on CO₂ rather than tangible environmental destruction?

Who benefits from a world where governments dictate energy consumption?

Is climate policy being used to shift economic dominance rather than genuinely improve the planet?

The aggressive promotion of net-zero policies suggests a geopolitical and financial agenda rather than an objective environmental necessity.

The net-zero movement is not just about reducing emissions, it is a global economic weapon designed to reshape industries, control energy, and shift financial power.
Rather than being a purely environmental initiative, net-zero policies represent a silent, strategic realignment of global power, forcing the world to comply with a system that ultimately benefits a select group of political and financial elites.

[JKjustys @JKjustys]

Who is Really Behind the Net-Zero Agenda?

The most aggressive proponents of net-zero policies are nations that lack substantial oil and gas reserves. These include:
•Germany – Once a powerhouse in coal and nuclear energy, it has aggressively shut down fossil fuel plants while pushing renewables, despite energy crises.
•France – Pioneering net-zero commitments while heavily reliant on nuclear power to reduce its energy vulnerability.
•United Kingdom – A former oil-producing power that is rapidly shifting towards wind and solar while implementing carbon taxes.

These nations are not leading the charge because of an inherent climate emergency but rather because they are economically and strategically dependent on foreign fossil fuels. The shift to green energy is as much about escaping reliance on oil-rich nations as it is about reducing carbon emissions.

Net-zero policies are crippling oil-rich economies, forcing them to comply with climate-driven regulations that weaken their energy dominance. The most impacted nations include:
•Canada – A major oil producer, yet aggressively limiting its own industry under pressure from global climate policies.
•Saudi Arabia – Forced to adopt “green energy” investments while still supplying global demand.
•Russia – A key energy exporter facing economic sanctions and climate restrictions that benefit Western nations.

By forcing net-zero policies onto the world, energy-deficient nations gain an upper hand, while oil-producing nations are coerced into limiting their own wealth and resources.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) has positioned itself as the global leader in climate change policy, yet its agenda benefits a select few. Through initiatives like “The Great Reset”, the WEF pushes for global control over energy, finance, and economies. The transition to net-zero allows unelected bureaucrats and corporate elites to dictate how nations produce, consume, and access energy.

Mark Carney, former governor of the Bank of Canada and Bank of England, is one of the chief architects of global climate finance. As the UN’s Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance, he is actively pressuring banks, businesses, and governments to defund fossil fuels while promoting “green finance” initiatives. Pressured financial institutions to cut funding for oil and gas projects.
Advocated for “carbon taxes” that increase costs for industries and consumers.
Created investment barriers for fossil fuel development, artificially inflating renewable energy markets.His role suggests that net-zero is less about protecting the environment and more about controlling global energy flows through financial instruments.

While net-zero policies dominate globaly, real-world environmental crises often receive less attention. Instead of focusing on immediate ecological concerns,the narrative revolves around carbon credits, green bonds, and regulatory control.

Why is climate activism so focused on CO₂ rather than tangible environmental destruction?

Who benefits from a world where governments dictate energy consumption?

Is climate policy being used to shift economic dominance rather than genuinely improve the planet?

The aggressive promotion of net-zero policies suggests a geopolitical and financial agenda rather than an objective environmental necessity.

The net-zero movement is not just about reducing emissions, it is a global economic weapon designed to reshape industries, control energy, and shift financial power.
Rather than being a purely environmental initiative, net-zero policies represent a silent, strategic realignment of global power, forcing the world to comply with a system that ultimately benefits a select group of political and financial elites.