J.M.L.C ☦

Lawyer. Orthodox Christian. Husband of a loving Ukrainian wife and blessed father to our child.

[J.M.L.C ☦ @JMLC78]

@Railbiiird @IuliiaMendel Sure...

[J.M.L.C ☦ @JMLC78]

@UOJ_America Russia is to blame, but it's not alone on the blame list. No party involved in this war is innocent or without responsibility. Neither Russia, nor the West who instigated it, nor Ukraine who did nothing to prevent it.

[J.M.L.C ☦ @JMLC78]

@Hannuska2109 @HavryshkoMarta Where do you read in her statement that she's defending Russian atrocities? She's speaking out against the prolongation of the war, not praising it.

[J.M.L.C ☦ @JMLC78]

@IGrabbi @IuliiaMendel Here's how it should end: we in the West put our pride in our pocket, admit our shared responsibilities in this war, and sit at the table with the Russians for serious diplomatic talks.

[J.M.L.C ☦ @JMLC78]

@Railbiiird @IuliiaMendel Noted that you hypocritically have nothing to say about the subject matter of the post istself. Confirmed that you're just trolling around.

[J.M.L.C ☦ @JMLC78]

@Dave_J_Bryant @ConciousLabRat ... illustration of the UK's actions. The proper juridical concept is, as I mentioned above, the concept of "abuse of right". And I explained why the present case (and others like it) are in essence an abuse of right.

You have no knowledge at all of the subject. Just admit it

[J.M.L.C ☦ @JMLC78]

@Dave_J_Bryant @ConciousLabRat 1. Listen, it's you who originally made a ludicrous claim that this vessel was trying to circumvent "international and national laws". Which laws are you referring to?

2. I obviously did not use the term piracy in its technical or juridical meaning. I used it as an ...

[J.M.L.C ☦ @JMLC78]

@Dave_J_Bryant @ConciousLabRat ... jurisdictions, and freedoms in good faith and in a manner that does not constitute an "abuse of right."

[J.M.L.C ☦ @JMLC78]

@Dave_J_Bryant @ConciousLabRat I sense some loss of composure on your side. What logical fallacies exactly? You've squarely lost the argument, hence your blabber. In closing, I will only add to my above analysis that article 300 of the UNCLOS states that countries must exercise their rights, ...

[J.M.L.C ☦ @JMLC78]

@Dave_J_Bryant @ConciousLabRat Article 300 of UNCLOS states that countries must exercise their rights, jurisdictions, and freedoms in good faith and in a manner that does not constitute an "abuse of right."

[J.M.L.C ☦ @JMLC78]

@Dave_J_Bryant @ConciousLabRat ... or pirates flying no flag at all. What the UK did here is the exploitation of a technicality (Cameroon revoking the flag) to police international waters for political and economic warfare, an action the strict text of and the spirit of UNCLOS tried to limit.

[J.M.L.C ☦ @JMLC78]

@Dave_J_Bryant @ConciousLabRat https://t.co/afOjR3mvnS

[J.M.L.C ☦ @JMLC78]

@Dave_J_Bryant @ConciousLabRat I will kindly ask you to stop wasting my time with your nonsense.

The assertion that the Smyrtos was legally "stateless" at the exact moment of interception is the UK government's formal legal claim, not an universally established consensus. In maritime law, state actions...

[J.M.L.C ☦ @JMLC78]

@Dave_J_Bryant @ConciousLabRat ... Ultimately, whether this operation was a valid enforcement of international law or an overreach depends entirely on a legal battle that has not yet played out in court.

[J.M.L.C ☦ @JMLC78]

@Dave_J_Bryant @ConciousLabRat ... Visit" show that if a warship boards a vessel on suspicion of statelessness and that suspicion proves wrong, the boarding state can be held liable for any loss or damage under Article 110(3). ...