@JDCowboys2@jasrifootball It’s not illegal formation. There are clearly seven guys on the line and four off. We can debate ineligible receiver downfield but people saying illegal formation are just wrong.
@elijah_1320@demcowboysfan@The20_er@jasrifootball It’s not illegal formation at all. It’s ineligible receiver downfield because they reported 70 as eligible instead of 68, but 68 reporting as eligible is where the controversy comes in.
@Jayson_D @SpartanSargex1 @YoshinoLover08 Hot take: All major AAA games right now are underpriced. Halo 3 was $60 in 2007. It’s a miracle we’re still paying $60 for games in 2023 when then quality, scale, and technology have all seen drastic improvements.
@v0kan@Jayson_D@YoshinoLover08 I don’t get the rage about the runtime. 11-12 hours is fine if it’s great the whole time. If you’ve ever gone to the movies you’ll pay about $20 to watch a 2-3 hour movie once but you want pay $60 to play a game that’s 5-6x longer that you can replay if you want.
@Brev2034@YoshinoLover08@Big__TeeJ There’s no such thing as an “appropriate length”. It’s different for every game. I actually thought Spiderman 2 could’ve been shorter. Also depends on what people consider valuable content. $60 for a 100 hour snooze fest is less valuable to me than a $70 10 hour thrill ride imo