@abierkhatib When Zionists were deciding which country to steal, Cyprus (my country) was one of their proposed choices. They still regard us as their "lost colony". Right now they're pouring in buying up everything - 12,000 of them is the latest count; I hear Hebrew everywhere 😡
Oh my God. I have got the names of the four victims of Israel’s crimes in north Gaza last night. It was a father, a mother, and their two children.
Momen Ahmad (father)
Hanin Saleh (mother)
Lana Ahmad (daughter, 12 years old)
Bana Ahmad (daughter, 8 years old)
The lie of "zionist not jewish" and "jews as a collective can't be held accountable for the crimes of 'israel'" is the heart of the issue. It is the ruse that grants jewish impunity to lobby eternally for atrocities in Palestine while maintaining deniability.
Imagine someone saying The Crusades had nothing to do with Christianity, Christians or Christian Supremacy. That's how ridiculous you sound when you deny Jewish Supremacy's role in the colonial Zionist project. Three years into a genocide carried out by Jewish crusaders.
"Shiksa" is a Yiddish term, meaning "abomination" or "impurity", used by Jews to derogatorily refer to non-Jewish women. You can often hear it being shouted at supposedly "immodestly-dressed" women who pass through ultra-Orthodox neighborhoods.
Now, imagine being a self-described liberal secular Jew, now even "anti-Zionist", and repeatedly using "shiksa" as a slur.
Shaiel doesn’t only use it on women who are actually non-Jewish, by the way - the anti-Zionist Jewish woman who exposed him as a sexual predator back in 2020 was also called "shiksa" by him. Back then, he claimed she was sent by malicious anti-Zionists who wanted to harm him because he's a Zionist. An honorary "shiksa" for exposing a Jewish abuser.
Shaiel Ben-Ephraim, the man so many around here are still platforming, despite him being an incredibly dangerous Israeli agent and a serial abuser of women, is a full-blown Jewish supremacist. By quoting or retweeting him, you are actively giving him power, one which he uses for malicious purposes, including the exploitation of genocide victims in Gaza. Stop platforming Zionist infiltrators.
Este niño se llamaba Obaida, tenía 10 años, "Israel" lo asesinó de un disparo en el pecho, matándolo frente a su madre dentro de una tienda de campaña en el desierto de Al-Mawasi, Khan Younis, al sur de Gaza.
"Israel" ha matado a más de 315 niños en los últimos 320 dias, silencio en la "prensa libre" occideental.
For more than a decade, the criminal Saudi regime has waged a genocidal war on Yemen. So what does @markjcarney’s government do? It condemns the victims.
*Palestinian Resistance Media Responds to the ‘Haaretz’ Article*
The resistance platform, ‘Pursuit of the Fifth Column,’ has published a response to Shlomi Eldar and Ruth Yuval’s 7 October 2026 ‘Haaretz’ article (“Revealed: Netanyahu Received an Explicit Warning Days Before Oct. 7. He Didn't Brief Israel's Security Chiefs”). The response directly engages with the narrative that Tufan al-Aqsa was “permitted” by the occupation as a casus belli—a narrative proffered by both the liberal Zionist, anti-Netanyahu flank of the security, intelligence, and political establishment within ‘Israel’ and myriad Fatah/Palestinian Authority figures. The article, translated in full below, reads as follows:
“‘Haaretz’ revealed that Mohamed bin Zayed had warned the head of the occupation government, Benjamin Netanyahu, just days before the October 7, 2023 attack. This revelation confronts the Emirati regime with the reality of its role as an intelligence base serving the occupation and gathering information against our people and their resistance activity.
Yet the same claims also undermine the myth promoted by Palestinian Authority mouthpieces and Fatah’s online trolls that the occupation ‘allowed the operation’ to take place. Such a claim would mean that the occupation army deliberately permitted the greatest security and military breach in its history, accepted the killing of more than 1,500 Israelis, and allowed its military prestige to be dragged through the mud simply so that Netanyahu could obtain a pretext for attacking Gaza.
Military experts and analysts in Hebrew-language and international media agree that the claim that the attack was ‘deliberately allowed’ fundamentally contradicts the strategic logic of deterrence.
Many have asked: ‘How could an entity that built its existence on the myth of the “invincible army” accept the paralysis of its leadership, the destruction of its military divisions, the capture of dozens of officers and soldiers, and the killing of hundreds of settlers and soldiers in a single day? How could it accept the greatest defeat in its history merely to obtain a pretext for war?’
*Contempt, Denial, and Lack of Intelligence: The Causes of the October 7 Failure*
The same Hebrew-language newspaper published an investigation last year into the Israeli intelligence failure to anticipate the October 7 attack. It concluded that contempt, denial, and the military’s cessation of intelligence gathering on Hamas for more than two years led to the al-Aqsa Flood.
The newspaper cited current and former officials who said that, beginning in May 2021, the army stopped gathering intelligence on meetings of Hamas leaders and on Hamas training exercises. This followed the operation that ‘Israel’ called ‘Guardian of the Walls.’
*’Hamas Will Not Launch an Attack’*
The investigation found that the Israeli military had not considered the possibility that Hamas fighters could breach the underground barrier the army had constructed along the Gaza Strip border, as well as the surrounding fence.
‘Israeli’ commanders continued to dismiss the warning signs until the final moments before the October 7 attack. An ‘Israeli’ soldier informed his commanders of ‘unusual’ activity involving a Hamas commander, but the commanders dismissed it as nothing more than ‘routine training.’
At the political level, other analyses have portrayed the accusations, leaks, and conflicting documents exchanged between Netanyahu’s office, the Shin Bet leadership, and the army as part of a struggle for political survival and an effort to evade investigations into the failure to prevent the ‘Black Saturday’ of 7 October 2023.
Meanwhile, Palestinian Authority apparatchiks and Fatah have attempted to downplay this failure by promoting the claim that ‘Netanyahu allowed the operation.’ This represents a profound debasement of political discourse and a wholesale embrace of ‘Israeli’ narratives.
Observers argue that their media conduct goes beyond ordinary political rivalry. It reaches the point of dangerous alignment with the occupation’s propaganda at a time when the Palestinian people are facing a war of total annihilation.
*A Moral Collapse That Goes Beyond Political Rivalry*
Political activist and writer Amer Yassin stressed that political disagreement with Hamas, criticism of its policies, and holding it accountable are all legitimate within the Palestinian arena. None of this, however, justifies responding positively to the occupation’s narratives and threats or treating them as a political gain in an internal dispute.
*Malicious Exploitation*
Experts argue that enlisting figures who hold leadership positions in a political movement as prominent as Fatah in Israeli incitement networks marks a dangerous development in psychological warfare and rumor-mongering. They argue that the involvement of Fatah leaders and affiliated figures in the ‘Avichay Adraee’ incitement network is intended to lend false credibility to anti-resistance rhetoric and exploit their positions within the movement to sow divisions among Palestinians. These revelations have prompted growing calls from Palestinians and activists to put an end to what they see as a moral and national disgrace. They ask bitterly: How can Fatah allow someone who has sunk to this level [Muhammad Munzir al-Batta] to represent the movement in a major European capital? And how can someone who claims to be a national leader engage in such disgraceful conduct, inciting against his own people at a time when they are being slaughtered?
Activists are calling for immediate national action. They are demanding an immediate decision to remove and dismiss Muhammad Munzir al-Batta from all of his organizational and leadership positions, thereby preventing the [Fatah] movement’s name and institutional standing from being exploited in the service of ‘Israeli’ intelligence efforts.
They have also called for a comprehensive national investigation into his political and media ties with psychological-warfare units. They further demand that all of his accounts and incendiary platforms be banned, arguing that these platforms serve only the occupation’s objectives and promote collaboration and defeat.”
What is Dahlan’s strategy with the Haaretz article and the subsequent UAE statement attesting to a continued intelligence relationship between the UAE and ‘Israel’?
As is well known, Dahlan’s Fatah Democratic Reform Current is seeking to contest Abbas’ Palestinian Authority by forming a large coalition. But Dahlan’s sights are still ultimately set on Gazan governance—hence why he continues being involved with funding some of the collaborative militias (despite a recent feud with Ghassan al-Dahini) while simultaneously supporting the Nidal al-‘Amoudi Brigade within the broader Al-Aqsa Shahīds’ Brigades’ formation.
To achieve this political goal, Dahlan needs a sympathetic government coalition—one consisting of, for instance, Eizenkot, Yair Golan, or Lieberman. Dahlan has, for decades, establishes a kindred relationship with the liberal Zionist flank of the security and political establishment in ‘Israel.’ His kinship with Shimon Peres, Ehud Olmert, and Tzipi Livni is well known. Such a government would, Dahlan likely hopes, withdraw from Gaza and hand control of the Strip over to him and the extant security formation he has helped build.
It was also revealed that Shlomi Eldar, who helped publish the Haaretz report, received funding from an organization linked to Yair Golan’s party. Yair Golan and Ronen Bar also secretly visited the United Arab Emirates about two months ago. It is unconfirmed whether they met with Dahlan.
Benjamin Netanyahu stands on Mount Hermon in occupied Syria, boasting ‘Damascus is here, Lebanon is there, the Golan Heights, the Syrian plateau is there, we control the entire area.’
Israel’s expansionism and growing regional hegemony was only possible with the neutering of Syria, unable and unwilling to even challenge the Israeli occupation now with CIA asset and former ISIS/Al Qaeda Commander Ahmad Al-Sharaa in power in Damascus.
Mohammed Dahlan Intercede the “Israeli” Election Cycle
According to reports circulating in the Hebrew media, the Likud Party is accusing Mohammed Dahlan of being behind the alleged Emirati warning to Netanyahu prior to October 7—and of now interfering in the “Israeli” electoral process with the aim of toppling the right-wing government in favor of Gadi Eisenkot.
Likud goes even further—describing what has come to light over the past two days as “blatant foreign interference in the Israeli elections,” and asserting that Dahlan is directly involved in bringing down Netanyahu’s government.
Dahlan, who fostered kinships with Shimon Peres and Ehud Olmert actively participated in the Oslo Process, has long had a security relationship with the liberal Zionist flank of the Shin Bet and political establishment.