Joe the Geographer

Geographer & Pilot; Minnesota native & resident; Christian Zionist

[Joe the Geographer @JoeGeographer]

I've been waiting for this message from my President since 1979 . . . . .

Thank you President Trump!

[Joe the Geographer @JoeGeographer]

Jill Biden Exposed By Vanity Fair After She Betrays the American People https://t.co/5NniekNgJZ via @AntiLibWombat

Link continues coverage of this important story.

Just because it's faded from the front lines is no reason to loose sight of this story.

[Joe the Geographer @JoeGeographer]

To build upon this excellent analysis, Hitler actually looked down upon Facists like Mussolini for not being sufficiently racist and anti-Semetic.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Funny that you're celebrating Grok on this one.

You clearly didn't watch the video. The whole point of it is to explain why historians filed Hitler under "far right" in the first place.

Ask yourself who wrote that history. After 1945, academia across the West leaned heavily left. In France, De Gaulle handed education and culture to the communists in exchange for social peace, and that mindset spread through every university for 80 years. Those people had every reason to push Hitler as far away from their own camp as possible. So they did.

Grok is trained on that corpus. When it repeats the consensus, it isn't proving anything. It's showing you exactly how deep the bias goes. Repeat the same lie 150 times and it's still a lie.

Stop looking at the labels historians assigned and look at what the Nazis actually did with the economy. Price and wage controls. Mandatory cartels. The Four-Year Plan. Autarky. Currency controls. Agriculture run by the Reich Food Estate. Private property on paper, state command in practice. Their "privatizations" meant handing companies to party loyalists who did exactly what Berlin ordered. That is economic collectivism: the individual exists to serve the collective, whether you call that collective the proletariat or the Volk.

Hitler crushed the Marxists because they were fighting for the same voters, not because he rejected collectivism. Two branches of the same tree.

Elon is right. And I'd bet Grok gets corrected on this sooner than people think.

It's the same reason Alex Karp calls Palantir the first fully anti-woke company and now trains kids straight out of high school instead of taking whatever elite universities produce. When institutions have been ideologically captured for decades, you don't argue with the output. You rebuild the pipeline.

[MAZE @mazemoore]

Many people are under the impression that the talk about Ilhan Omar marrying her brother started during the Trump years. Not true. Here is some info about it that people may not know.

The accusations of fraud came from Somalians during her democrat primary in 2016. The accusations ended up on a website but they originated from her fellow Somalians.

Democrats tried furiously to dox the people who called out the fraud.

In 2016, the local news had reported that an official investigation had begun into Omar's alleged fraud. Omar had filed joint tax returns with a different man than she was married to. Much of the fraud was obvious and was being discussed on the news.

An Obama-appointed State Attorney saved Ilhan Omar's political career by taking the unprecedented step of writing a letter to Omar's attorney stating that Omar was not under investigation. It is unknown if there was an investigation into Omar that was shut down, or if he just wrote the letter to help her campaign.

Omar's campaign used that letter as a talking point and ended up winning her election.

Just some info because the MSM has been telling people for a decade that Trump and conservatives made up the "false" allegations against Omar.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

My post about Hitler and the far right got millions of views. Clearly, it hit a nerve. So today I'm going to show you, step by step, why the notion of "far right" as it's used in France makes almost no sense. And why the people who wield it are usually the last ones who should be lecturing anyone.

Let's start with the only question that matters: what makes a political system work or fail? To a very large extent, it's the economy. A country that produces wealth, that lets its citizens create, trade and build, stays standing. A country that destroys that collapses, no matter how beautiful its slogans are.

And in economics, there are really only two worldviews.

The first is collectivism. The idea that the State knows better than you. That it must plan production, set prices, run companies, decide what you earn, what you buy, and eventually what you think. The individual is just a cog serving a grand collective project: the class, the nation, the race, the people.

The second is freedom. Capitalism, property, individual liberty, individual responsibility. The idea that millions of people creating value for one another produce infinitely more prosperity than an office of planners, however brilliant they may be.

Now look at the list of the great totalitarian regimes of the 20th century. Stalin: total planning, forced collectivization, millions dead. Mao: the Great Leap Forward and the deadliest famine in human history. Pol Pot: money abolished, cities emptied, nearly a quarter of Cambodia's population exterminated. Mussolini, the man who coined the word fascism: "Everything within the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State." And Hitler, leader of the National Socialist German Workers' Party, whose program proclaimed "the common good before individual good." He subjected the entire German economy to State plans: the Four-Year Plan, frozen prices and wages, unions dissolved into a single state labor front, industrialists producing whatever the regime decided.

Their flags were different. Their designated enemies were different. But the machinery was the same: the individual doesn't exist, only the collective matters, and the State decides everything.

Why does it always end in totalitarianism? Because collectivism doesn't work. And when a system doesn't work, it has only two options: admit failure or force people. They always choose force.

Ludwig von Mises proved it as early as 1920: without free prices, without a market, a planner simply cannot know what to produce, how much, or at what cost. He is flying blind. A planned economy isn't a less efficient version of the market. It's an impossibility.

Friedrich Hayek drew the political conclusion in 1944 in The Road to Serfdom, a book he dedicated "to the socialists of all parties." One chapter is titled "The Socialist Roots of Naziism." Another, "Why the Worst Get on Top." For Hayek, controlling the economy isn't controlling one sector among others. It is "the control of the means for all our ends." Whoever controls your bread controls your life. Then your speech. Then your thoughts.

Milton Friedman put it his own way: a society that puts equality before freedom ends up with neither.

So we know exactly what works. It's not an opinion. It's a century of real-world experiments. Listen to the Austrian school, Mises and Hayek, with Friedman from Chicago alongside them: economic freedom, limited government, individual responsibility.

And this is where we get to the great accusatory inversion. Part of the left-wing press spends its time screaming fascism. Why? Because the fascism fantasy is the best way to never talk about the track record of their own ideas. Deep down, they know: if their collectivist program were applied all the way, it wouldn't work, because a collective economy cannot work. And an economy that doesn't work always ends up having to coerce, surveil and ban. In other words, it becomes exactly what they claim to be fighting. The real heirs of totalitarian logic are not the ones being pointed at.

So who gets called "far right" in 2026? People who want safe cities. People who want to keep their culture. People who just want to live a peaceful life, raise their kids, and not have to board up their shop every weekend. People who want the law to apply to everyone.

If that's the far right, then the word no longer means anything. And maybe that was the point.

[Nicki Minaj @NICKIMINAJ]

♥️

[John Cleese @JohnCleese]

Disgraceful

Pointless

And what will happen?

Nothing

[Trump Girl 🇺🇲🦅🇺🇲 @MAGA__Patriot]

Why did they condem it at first, then go quiet when they realised the truth?

[MAGA Voice @MAGAVoice]

LMFAO 🤣 President Trump just completely ended Ilhan Omar’s whole career with one MEME 💀

I CAN’T STOP LAUGHING 😂

[Beloved of God @Edenlife9]

“Young girls were cleaning the semen off Epstein’s clothes, is that wrong?”

“Yeah so gross 🤮”

“Actually that’s the story of Muhammad, do you think it’s wrong?”

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

Listen to every word

“I voted. I was standing in that voting booth thinking about high gas prices, expensive groceries, housing costs and the financial pressure on working families. Then my mind went to France, to Dearborn, Michigan and I realized this election is about far more than gas and groceries.

It's about our future, radical Islam, national security, illegal immigration, our borders, education, parental rights, sex and gender policies, and the values our children inherit.

I couldn't see myself voting for a party that hates America, apologizes for our country, is ashamed of our flag, and wants to rewrite our history and abandon our values.

So I voted red, not because Republicans get everything right, always do right by everyday Americans, or are free from corruption, but because I believe we can only fix this country if we still have a country left to fix”

I could not have said it better myself. Voting Blue is literally voting to end America and for the eventual Islamic takeover of America. Voting Democrat means being wiped out by illegals, having our elections permanently rigged, our culture replaced and never having a way out

Everyone needs to vote Red like your life depends on it because it does

[Global News Daily @GlobaNewsDaily]

This is her modus operandi. You English speakers only know one side of Ilhan. You dont know the violent, fascistic, ethnonationalist, ethnosupremacist Ilhan. That one is reserved for her Somali speaking audience. She is highly machiavelian, duplicitous and cunning. Here she is sending one message to the “white” “liberal” “naive” audience (message: oh look at me walking in a park with my husband life is great I am just an ordinary family woman). To her Somali audience the dog whistle violent rhetoric is in the song itself which btw is a war cry / war song: “I will wipe the floor with my enemies. I will crush them under my boot. I will put them in graves”. The duality and duplicity of Ilhan Omar. You really dont know what or who youre dealing with. These are her forbears (real picture). She comes from Somalian fascist nazis.

[Gad Saad @GadSaad]

It is. And wallah, if anyone disagrees with me, I'll kill them and their entire family. I mean peacefully of course.

[Joe the Geographer @JoeGeographer]

The New Info on Ilhan Omar Is Insane https://t.co/1vqjE8XaS8 via @YouTube

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Yes

[Radically Right @RadicallyRight_]

I just love him! 🤣😆🤣

Take a minute to listen to @XAVIAER and if you’re not following him, what are you waiting for?

[Joe the Geographer @JoeGeographer]

Late season honeybee harvesting from a sunflower.

[Gad Saad @GadSaad]

It is astounding that you could be such an imbecilic Wood Cricket Jew. You know nothing about Islam in the real-world. You are truly vile.