How do you weaponize fear?
Ask Woodrow Wilson, America’s worst free speech president.
During WWI, the Espionage Act and Sedition Act were used to prosecute thousands for anti-war speech, jail critics, and restrict dissent, reshaping what Americans could say.
@liz_churchill10 I can only say that I was astonished with the recent revelations that the Republicans and Loyalists, were seen together in mutual protest against the immigration issue.
What is going on behind the scenes will be telling if they are willing to work in (however limited) synergy?
@liz_churchill10 “The most devious and sinister acts of historical violence are always committed by tyrants with armies — not citizens with arms.”
― Seth Daniel Parker
The Trump administration is dismantling the Ocean Observatories Initiative, a key monitoring system for tracking the climate crisis.
Policy expert David Helvarg calls it "the most advanced system for understanding the deep ocean," which was set to continue operating for at least another 15 years. He says the Trump administration, however, is more focused on oil drilling and deep-sea mining, treating the ocean "as a gas station and a garbage dump."
@donwinslow Tyranny doesn’t happen in the blink of an eye. It is a slow descent, helped by the complicity of those who think they have no power.”
― Elaine Ho
@DefiantLs “...even in a state where surveillance seems total, the experience of tyranny and injustice can always radicalize people. Anger at arbitrary power will always lead someone to start thinking about some other system, some better way to run society.”
― Anne Applebaum
The three-pronged propaganda strategy:
1. Subsidize the media until journalists become mouthpieces
2. Pressure the platforms until dissent disappears
3. Criminalize whatever survives as "hate" or "harm"
In 1879, JP Morgan paid a man to invent the lie that is the foundation of modern economics.
A billionaire who helped start Amazon just exposed the whole thing on Diary of a CEO, and once you hear it you will never look at paychecks the same way again:
146 years ago, a guy named Henry George wrote a book called Progress and Poverty.
It was the first mainstream book about the rich systematically stealing from the poor, and It literally became the bestselling book in the history of the United States at the time.
The working class was reading it everywhere, and the people at the top of the economy completely lost their minds.
So JP Morgan personally brought a man named John Bates Clark to Columbia University, which was essentially the intellectual headquarters of Wall Street, and told him to fix the problem.
Clark wrote a book called The Distribution of Wealth. In it, he invented something called the "theory of marginal productivity," which claims that because markets are perfectly efficient, the amount of money you earn reflects EXACTLY the value you contribute to the economy.
If you make $15,000 a year, that's because you're providing $15,000 of value. If a hedge fund manager makes $500 million a year moving money around, that's an accurate reflection of the value he creates in the world.
And Clark literally said the quiet part out loud IN HIS OWN BOOK.
He wrote that they had to prove to working people that no matter how much they make, whether it's a little or a lot, it accurately reflects their value, because if workers ever concluded that their labor was worth more than they were being paid, they would revolt and destroy the entire system.
That was the whole point. The theory was built to prevent a revolution.
And it worked so well that it got absorbed into mainstream economics and is STILL taught as a foundational principle to this day.
Every time a CEO tells you "the market decides your salary," they're repeating a framework that was literally commissioned by JP Morgan in the 1800s to convince you not to ask for more.
Nick Hanauer, the billionaire who told this story, also shared the numbers that prove why it matters right now:
The median full-time worker in America earns about $60,000 a year. If that same worker had maintained the same share of GDP they held in 1975, they wouldn't be making $60,000. They'd be making $120,000. That gap goes all the way up to the 90th percentile. If you earn $180,000 today, you'd be earning $250,000 under the old distribution.
The ONLY people who benefited from 50 years of economic growth were the top 10%, and the vast majority of that went to the top 1%. That is trillions of dollars every single year that used to be wages for ordinary working people and now sits in the accounts of the wealthiest people on the planet.
This happened because of policy. Tax cuts for the rich, deregulation for the powerful, and wage suppression for everyone else, all justified by an economic theory that was invented specifically to make you believe you deserve exactly what you're getting.
And the craziest part is that GDP growth rates in America were 4 to 4.5% for decades when workers were included in prosperity. As soon as the neoliberals took over in the mid-1970s and implemented these policies, GDP growth fell to 3% and eventually to 2%.
Including people in the economy doesn't slow growth down. It's literally the thing that CREATES growth. And the theory that convinced the world otherwise was a hit job paid for by one of the richest men in history to keep workers quiet.
What do you think?
@For_Film_Fans It is absolutely murder on the original story -- but a damn good movie nonetheless.
Also, I suggest anyone interested in the story itself and the purpose behind it, should check out this documentary...
https://t.co/idn1tcEp1j
Social Security's retirement trust fund is projected to face a funding shortfall in 2032, a year earlier than last year's projections, according to an annual report released Tuesday. https://t.co/Vj5PAqMbCw