I have seen videos of a discreet handover ceremony that took place when Lewis and Wicknell were still doing business together. Let me be clear: that does not excuse or defend the insult directed at Lewis yesterday morning, nor does it diminish the principled stance he has taken. In fact, it even makes it more heroic because here is a person who has had dealings with Wicknell mustering the courage to say NO and giving good reasons for his rejection. That matters.
The videos do not however, tell any story at all. They do not speak to the circumstances under which the gift was given. We cannot be misled into attaching a context where none exists. What if that was payment for services rendered? And whilst on it, I must make it emphatically clear that Lewis has the right to represent whoever he wishes to represent.
More to the point. There is nothing wrong with friends privately gifting one another. The problem arises when manufactured generosity is used to advance a programme, promote intellectual submission, or serve a malicious agenda. We cannot accept having one of our finest being reduced to a public spectacle by a process that even invades their sanctified matrimony. What is presently at issue is a gift from a “stranger”, one with whom Lewis had “grown apart” and not communed with for over 2 years.
Imagine you are only hours away from acting against someone’s principal when their lackey; who has not spoken to you in years; suddenly appears with a vuvuzela gift intended to undermine your independence. The message is obvious: that you cannot be trusted by your own client, because you can be influenced by an opponent’s trinkets and displays of generosity. “Munhu wedu”, is the loud but false message.
That is why Lewis has rightly centred his response on independence. Some of us may have moved beyond that position, and that is our prerogative. But Lewis cannot be held responsible for the ego bruising comments made by the masses. Lewis accepts that he has represented Wicknell, made money from him but he disclaims insulting drama and has in doing so delivered a “treatise on professional ethics”.
Even if Lewis has made mistakes in the past, he has not erred on this occasion. He cannot be held to his past by a video taken by “friends” on a cheap and discolored phone. He has taken a position consistent with honour, principle, and integrity and that position deserves to be applauded. That’s where we are.
You have been rebuffed. Accept it, take it on the chin, and move on.
Your propaganda has moved from nothing, to nothing.
🔸The key word is independence. If you take their cars or cash, vanokuita muranda wavo. No self-respecting professional or person wants that. The guy compliments your wife and gives her US$50K for a “handbag.” You smile and say thank you. What do you think will happen when he slides into her DMs? What happens when they ask you to pay the “favour” back? Musanyepedzere kuzungaira. This is a corrupt, dangerous zhet. Do not fall for it! Unoita fuza ravo.🙌🏽
We need new leaders.🇿🇼
Dear Wicknell,
Thank you for your generous words about my professional work and for your kind acknowledgment of my wife. I appreciate your recognition of the dedication with which I discharged the briefs entrusted to me.
My wife and I have carefully considered your announcement and must respectfully decline the vehicle and both cash gifts.
For clarity, we last spoke in June 2024, and I have undertaken no professional work for you since then. The historical work to which your tribute refers was performed in my professional capacity and paid for in full. My remuneration was for services actually rendered.
Your announcement came as a complete surprise, without prior notice or discussion. Given the distance that has developed between us since our last conversation, the substantial nature of the gifts, and their express connection to past professional services, I must approach this gesture with particular care.
Zimbabwe’s Legal Practitioners’ Code of Conduct requires us to preserve our integrity, safeguard our professional independence and maintain public confidence in the profession. The International Bar Association’s principles and the International Commission of Jurists’ writings likewise emphasise that a lawyer’s professional judgment must remain independent and free from conflicting personal interests.
Applying those standards to these circumstances, I consider it necessary to decline benefits that could reasonably create a perception of personal financial obligation extending beyond a concluded and fully remunerated professional engagement. My wife and I attach great importance to preserving both our professional standing and public confidence in our independence.
The independence reflected in your generous tribute is a responsibility I must continue to uphold.
Please receive our decision in the respectful spirit in which it is conveyed. We appreciate the generosity expressed and your acknowledgment of my past work. Our decision is nevertheless firm: we will not accept the vehicle or either of the cash gifts.
We wish you well and trust that you will understand and respect our position.
Advocate Dr Lewis Uriri
🔸Under Mugabe, they unleashed Operation Murambatsvina. Today, they’re unleashing Operation Chenesa.
It’s always the same anti-people, anti-poor, anti-progress policies. Do you think anybody chooses to be a vendor? If this economy was conducive to job creation and one could get formal employment, do you think anybody would choose to sell bananas or plastic shoes on the side of the road? In other countries, the poor get social grants. In this country, the poor who are trying to make an honest living get swept off the street like dirt.
We need new leaders.🇿🇼
Dangote: I Had My First Private Jet at 22
Nigerian billionaire Aliko Dangote says he bought his first private aircraft four months before he turned 23.
"I’ve seen it all. Whenever I see people flying everywhere in private aircraft but they don’t own a factory, it means they aren’t contributing to the economy," he said. - Arise News.
🔸Before election: “Vendors4ED, we love you. Vote for us. Hapana anokubvisai kusvikira Jesu adzoka.”
After election: “We have banned vending. Munetsvina. Murikutisemesa.”
I repeat, @ZANUPF_Official is the most anti-poor grouping you’ll ever find. They abuse poor people for votes at election time then treat them like dirt when the election is over. It’s a mess.
We need new leaders.🇿🇼
VENDING IS NOT A CRIME.
Dear Zpf Politicians, never take citizens for granted. The lives, livelihoods and aspirations of citizens are far too important to be reduced to electioneering, sloganeering and political games.
For many citizens, vending is not a choice. It is a means of survival, a livelihood and a way of providing for families.
Leadership means compassion. Citizens deserve policies that protect dignity and livelihoods, not politics that makes their daily struggles harder.
Stop playing politics with citizens’ lives. Citizens first. Citizens always.
Heaven is only the goal for poor people maan 😭your prophet , church elder / apostle/ gospel singers dont give a fvck about going or not as long they live a comfortable flamboyant life here on earth . Whether the masses are crying or not . Whether the congregants got food at home or not . Imi chenyu is milk and honey then meet and greet nana Mozisi 🚮🚮.
Utter woke nonsense !