the proponent of Radiatively Driven Circulation (RDC) theory as a mechanism of atmospheric transport around cumulus clouds, which is important in climate system
We lean more toward Fluid Dynamics than METeorology.
MET-climatology community may consider our RDC theory heretical.
But from an FD perspective, their DD theory—which posits convection involving only mixing uniformization accounts for effective horizontal transport—is heretical.
We have no preconceived notions about any research institution.
Operating independently from main climate research hubs, we lack prior knowledge of who takes interest in the RDC scheme.
Thus, we assess compatibility solely by contact timing.
https://t.co/9BH9HoD1Xp
The outcomes of empirical parameter tuning remain uncertain until a numerical model is actually run.
In contrast, the behavior of theoretical models rooted in physical laws can be predicted and explained prior to execution.
This is why we have full confidence in the RDC scheme.
The outcomes of empirical parameter tuning remain uncertain until a numerical model is actually run.
In contrast, the behavior of theoretical models rooted in physical laws can be predicted and explained prior to execution.
This is why we have full confidence in the RDC scheme.
We aren't trying to revolutionize climate modeling overnight.
The few researchers who truly get the RDC scheme are all we need.
Building a couple of solid implementations with them will be enough.
The results alone will create quite a stir.
https://t.co/f0SXurgg18
We aren't trying to revolutionize climate modeling overnight.
The few researchers who truly get the RDC scheme are all we need.
Building a couple of solid implementations with them will be enough.
The results alone will create quite a stir.
https://t.co/f0SXurgg18
Even as a private company, we aim to engage with research institutions not as paying customers, but as collaborative research partners.
For that reason, we have highlighted the physical limitations of the DD method and advocated for a transition to the RDC scheme.
Isn't this reasoning regarding cumulus detrainment familiar?
The shift in perspective—from internal cumulus dynamics to the external thermodynamic structure—is exactly like the historical shift from the geocentric to the heliocentric model.
It is a typical Copernican revolution.
Even as a private company, we aim to engage with research institutions not as paying customers, but as collaborative research partners.
For that reason, we have highlighted the physical limitations of the DD method and advocated for a transition to the RDC scheme.
Researchers accustomed to conventional parameter tuning might find the RDC scheme's approach—requiring no external data—somewhat radical.
Yet, the clear-sky subsidence flow at the core of RDC's physics is the very process where theory describes reality most precisely.
Don’t think we live in an era unrelated to the intense geocentric vs heliocentric controversy.
They, too, must have believed they were living in peaceful and nonpartisan times.
At every moment, it’s the same: only those who realize the truth fight desperately to make it known.
Don’t think we live in an era unrelated to the intense geocentric vs heliocentric controversy.
They, too, must have believed they were living in peaceful and nonpartisan times.
At every moment, it’s the same: only those who realize the truth fight desperately to make it known.
Many institutions seem to wait to see how things play out, acting only after the community and others decide.
However, they, too, are no different from supporters of the geocentric theory.
They make no effort to think for themselves, simply following the majority and authority.
We acknowledge a diversity of opinions.
We even respect groups that stubbornly refuse to accept the RDC scheme.
After all, theater needs villains.
To highlight the legitimacy of our position, we allow them to play the role of the villain to the fullest.
The play will be exciting.
Past research history does not matter.
Even those who have long devoted themselves to the DD method will be warmly welcomed as Partners, provided they recognize the true effectiveness of the RDC scheme.
Despite our detailed explanations so far, we can still imagine people laughing and calling our claims exaggerated.
The same thing likely happened to the new theories of the Renaissance.
Which role do you intend to play on the stage of history?
https://t.co/hsdWuJhmOQ
Why does parameter tuning still dominate climate models?
Because it relies on the past success of dynamics in weather forecasting.
But climatic net circulation is thermodynamics-based, not dynamics.
The RDC scheme proves a completely different kind of climate model is possible.
Every research institution now faces a choice: become a pioneer of this next-generation theoretical climate atmospheric model, or wait for the RDC package release and settle for being just one of the followers.
The deadline is closing in.
Contact us early.
https://t.co/f0SXurgg18
Originating from the clear-sky subsidence flow, the RDC scheme deduces other physical quantities purely through physical laws—ultimately resolving the net attributes of cumulus clouds.
This marks the dawn of a truly theoretical climate atmospheric model.
https://t.co/g0y6F9fjDs
Researchers accustomed to conventional parameter tuning might find the RDC scheme's approach—requiring no external data—somewhat radical.
Yet, the clear-sky subsidence flow at the core of RDC's physics is the very process where theory describes reality most precisely.
We see high traffic to both our company and theory websites.
But since visits are anonymous, we can't identify who is showing the strongest interest.
To advance RDC research together, we offer various flexible partnership options to diverse organizations:
https://t.co/f0SXurgg18
Furthermore, where appropriate, we are fully prepared to handle the early stages—from building the RC model and obtaining the RCE state to analyzing the resulting flow field.
Once you review these results, your development team can step in to work on implementing the RDC scheme.