Josemaria

SometimeFoodSometimesAgriculture | Agricultural Consultant| Writer| Researcher

[Josemaria @Josbarasa]

So the last words they were told were ' we behead you in the name of Allah?'

[Mohd Modey @sarkinnomaa]

THIS IS WHAT REALLY HAPPENED ABOUT THE EXECUTION IN SAUDI.

False claims are circulating on social media that the two people executed in Mecca were husband and wife, had an eight-year-old daughter, and were Hajj pilgrims. These claims are described as rumours.

So, what is the reported truth?

On October 14, 2026, two Bangladeshi nationals, Nazrul Islam Abdul Basir and Siti Akhtar, were reportedly executed in Mecca, Saudi Arabia. According to the account, they were not married to each other.

Bangladeshi media reports that Nazrul travelled to Saudi Arabia in 2022 to work as a cleaner, while Siti was also working there.

In May 2023, approximately one month before Hajj, the two were allegedly caught by Saudi security forces engaging in immoral acts inside a mosque in Mecca.

They reportedly spent more than three years in detention before being tried in a Jeddah court. After being found guilty, they were executed in Mecca on October 14, 2026, reportedly following a royal order. Their bodies were sent to Bangladesh on October 18.

Why was the punishment so severe?

Mosques hold a special place in Islam, and the sanctity of mosques in Mecca is particularly significant because of their connection to our sacred religious heritage.

Saudi Arabia strictly regulates public conduct, and acts considered serious sexual misconduct inside a mosque may attract severe legal consequences. The account states that the Saudi Ministry of Interior confirmed that the charges against the two individuals involved “fi’al al-fahisha”—a term referring to an obscene or seriously immoral act.

Bangladesh’s State Minister for Foreign Affairs, Shama Obaid Islam, reportedly confirmed the details on October 17.

The issue is not their nationality; it is the sanctity of Allah’s house.

A mosque is a place of worship, prayer, and remembrance of Allah—not a place for immoral behaviour.

Let us respect the sacredness of our places of worship and stop spreading unverified claims. Know the facts before sharing rumours.

[Josemaria @Josbarasa]

Oya @Safaricom_Care you guys can't reverse money sent to the wrong pochi?

[Josemaria @Josbarasa]

@eagiesbetter

[Josemaria @Josbarasa]

@vintagetinnah @LeviMunyeri @edwinsifuna Alaa ulikuwa mbele yangu

[Josemaria @Josbarasa]

@Blessedonx1 Hahaha Wtf is this?

[Josemaria @Josbarasa]

@Osama_otero Zote zimeenda showground

[Josemaria @Josbarasa]

@inglorious_bat Checked the livestock population compared to the human population in Kenya and I can assure you the protein deficit is much larger

[Josemaria @Josbarasa]

@kimaiyo @Entr_dawood Noted
https://t.co/CX1BaI4qbF

[Josemaria @Josbarasa]

Tulia dawa iingie

[Josemaria @Josbarasa]

2 weeks of employment and this place is nice ngl

[Josemaria @Josbarasa]

Kutuna

[Shoba Gatimu @shobanes]

Last meeting of the day ✅
Straight to bed sasa kutuna.

[Josemaria @Josbarasa]

Mat za Ngong road hukuzungusha hapo kwa hizo estates uone manyumba alafu zinakurudisha kwa jam.

[Josemaria @Josbarasa]

Ouru's birch back then while sponsoring the bill is back here to wag his tail

[Hon. Aden Duale, EGH @HonAdenDuale]

Our attention has been drawn to public remarks by the Controller of Budget
suggesting that certain public funds fall outside any framework of oversight
and accountability. This characterisation is inaccurate and requires
clarification.
The mandate of the Office of the Controller of Budget is defined by Article
228 of the Constitution and the Controller of Budget Act, 2016. Under Article
228(4), the office authorises withdrawals from public funds under Articles
204, 206 and 207 — the Equalisation Fund, the Consolidated Fund and
County Revenue Funds — and, under the Act, from any other public fund that
an Act of Parliament expressly places under its approval. In every case,
Article 228(5) requires only that she confirm the withdrawal is authorised by
law.
The funds referred to in the interview were established by their own
legislation, each with defined mechanisms for management, withdrawal and
audit. They remain fully subject to the oversight of the Auditor-General and
Parliament. To suggest that money lawfully appropriated and administered
under an Act of Parliament is beyond scrutiny is to misstate both the law and
the facts.
The Controller of Budget is an independent constitutional office, and
Government respects that independence. Independence, however, is
exercised through the constitutional and statutory instruments provided —
reports to Parliament and lawful approval of withdrawals — not through
public commentary that mischaracterises the legal framework. Where any
office holder believes their mandate should be widened, the proper avenue is
the legislative process. Government notes that amendments to the Public
Finance Management Act to expand oversight of funds and levies outside
existing budget channels are already before Parliament, and it welcomes
that debate on its merits

[Josemaria @Josbarasa]

@MuchiriH Add western counties to that list

[Josemaria @Josbarasa]

@lenana_samorai @_mokaya0 Hahaha

[Josemaria @Josbarasa]

@xysist None, just ugly and annoying bloodsuckers

[Josemaria @Josbarasa]

@B3laze Siwezi kubali mzae akose random bottles once in a while juu I don't owe him anything, lazima aenjoy my existence

[Josemaria @Josbarasa]

@Jabali_Jr Nope, ni observation tu, ya side mbili za coin

[Josemaria @Josbarasa]

Umefikiwa niliona ukijibu victims ufala hapa letu jicho tu

[Jabez @Jabali_Jr]

My boy Wahome will get justice, its quite unfortunate he had to die juu ya upuzi ya mtu

[Josemaria @Josbarasa]

@Jabali_Jr Iko hapo kwa caption

[Josemaria @Josbarasa]

@_Wanjru https://t.co/05Bsat1lws
Alijaribu kuongelea hapa