A fantastic website created by a united fan who shared it with me. Completely free to use etc and has basically everything you need to know. Has direct links to all the club sponsors too as well as the glazer and ineos owned companies. #BoycottUnited https://t.co/1mMRvBRnvl
š£ļøTHE WARNINGS AND THE TRUTH
Four years ago we warned where this was heading.
We warned about the marginalisation and eradication of generational match-going Reds. Nobody listened.
We warned about the Americanisation of our game. Nobody cared.
We warned that if Ratcliffe didnāt change direction, heād become another Glazer in all but name.
Polls said give him more time.
So we did.
We even postponed a protest at Arsenal because fans wanted to give him more time. Again we got abuse.
That decision demotivated lads in The 1958 who have sacrificed years of their lives, time, money and energy fighting for this fanbase and never asked for a thing in return. Some lads had personal abuse. Not after sympathy, those are the facts.
We never asked for nothing in return. We always preferred to be pissing from the outside in. Stood shoulder to shoulder with you.
We have banged on about unity since day one.
And for the last 12 months we have spent an unbelievable amount of time trying to make it happen.
Meetings
Calls
Messages
Statements
Campaigns
Endless frustration
Meanwhile some fans wanted to be edgy.
Some said it wasnāt their fight.
Some thought it would never affect them.
Well look around now.
Ticket prices.
Season Ticket sanctions.
Long standing Reds treated like suspects.
Time served Reds receiving banning orders.
Concessions disappearing.
More hospitality.
More premiumisation.
A future built around revenue, not supporters.
The chickens have come home to roost.
We take no pleasure in saying it, but we have got far more right than wrong.
And we wish we hadnāt.
This was never about being proved right.
It was about stopping it before it happened.
So now the question is simple.
Are you finally United around what we have been warning about since the day we formed?
Wake up and smell the coffee.
This is your Club.
This is your fight all generations all ages.
Are you with us, or against us?
Time is running out fast.
STAND BY.
The 1958 š¾šŖ
Hull 2 - 0 Man Utd.
This is @markgoldbridge 's fault.
It's his fault that we:
1. Extended Maguire's contract
2. Employ Luke Shaw
3. Buy 3rd choice options instead of the first ones
4. Keep Rashford because INEOS are cheap
5. Don't buy elite players.
Idiots.
š£ļøOld Trafford: Stolen in Plain Sight
Saving the soul of Old Trafford. That is whatās at stake. Itās not just change its loss.
Do YOU feel the same?
The 1958 š¾šŖ
š£ļøDO NOT GET DISTRACTED BY CLUB & PRESS PR
Intended to move the narrative away from the real issues at the club.
Glazers, Ratcliffe and INEOS
We deserve better and our traditions need to be respected.
ā¢ā ā Show fans are important with actions and not platitudes
ā¢ā ā Reward loyalty stop exploiting it
ā¢ā ā Act as the blueprint for other clubs to follow in protecting loyalty and fan culture
ā¢ā ā Sort the ticketing and fairness system out
ā¢ā ā Remove the profit and loss mandate for the ticket office its the wild west.
ā¢ā ā Start acting like a bastion of the premier league
Performances on the pitch, signings, managers and a Disneyland circus stadium experience are secondary.
The 1958š¾šŖ
Man United donāt want a top manager Like Luis Enrique whoāll truly change things & expose the joke that is the hierarchy.
They prefer a low-maintenance yes-man who wins just enough to stay afloat. If even a serial winner like Luis Enrique a two-time treble winner canāt fix it, the blame lands solely on the owners and they canāt risk that.
No desire to actually become a winning club again. Just paper over the cracks in order to keep leveraging the club to take money out of it.
Letter To @AndyBurnhamGM Mayor Of Manchester.
Dear Mayor Burnham,
I am writing to you not only as a football supporter, but as someone who believes deeply in Manchesterās identity, heritage, and future.
I urge you in the strongest possible terms to reject the regeneration application put forward by Sir Jim Ratcliffe and the Glazer family. This proposal is not about the people of Manchester, nor about football, nor about genuine regeneration. It is about power, vanity, and profit at the expense of a historic institution that helped put this city on the global map.
For nearly 20 years, Manchester United has been systematically hollowed out by the Glazer family. Since their leveraged takeover in 2005, the club has been burdened with over £1 billion in debt, interest payments, fees, and dividends. While rival clubs invested in stadiums, training facilities, local jobs, and community infrastructure, Old Trafford was allowed to decay its roof leaking, facilities falling behind, and safety repeatedly questioned. This neglect was not accidental; it was the predictable outcome of an ownership model designed to extract wealth rather than build value.
During this period, the Glazers paid themselves hundreds of millions of pounds in dividends while the clubās competitiveness, reputation, and relationship with supporters steadily eroded. This is not regeneration. This is extraction.
Sir Jim Ratcliffe and INEOS now present themselves as saviours, yet their actions raise serious concerns. This project increasingly appears to be a vanity-led redevelopment, using Manchester Unitedās cultural and emotional capital to secure planning permissions, public goodwill, and long-term commercial upside without clear guarantees that the club, its supporters, or the local community will truly benefit.
Manchester United is not a property asset.
It is not a branding exercise.
It is not a financial instrument.
It is a civic institution, woven into the social, cultural, and economic fabric of this city. The clubās name is synonymous with Manchester across every continent. To allow those who have demonstrably damaged it to now reshape large parts of our city in their own image would be a profound failure of stewardship.
You have long spoken about protecting Manchester from decisions imposed by distant elites who do not live with the consequences of their actions. This is one of those moments. Approving this project would reward two decades of mismanagement and signal that global financiers can exploit our greatest institutions, then return asking for civic approval when it suits them.
Regeneration must be done with the people of Manchester, not to them.
It must be rooted in transparency, accountability, and community ownershipnot debt, leverage, and legacy-polishing.
Manchester deserves better.
Manchester United deserves better.
I ask you to stand with supporters, residents, and future generations by rejecting this application and demanding a vision for regeneration that genuinely serves the city and protects its soul.
Yours sincerely,
A concerned Manchester United supporter
š£ļøA CALL FOR UNITY AND TO CAST ASIDE DIFFERENCES
Some journalists, paid accounts, and bots will do everything they can to discredit and defuse any message or action that challenges this ownership. Thatās expected, we have always had to put up with this.
We do what we do for one reason only, the love of our club. Nothing else. We have never monetised this. We have never sold access, clicks, or credibility, unlike others.
We put ourselves out there to defend and fight for our club, fan culture and for the next generation of supporters. We are just honest, hard working lads who refuse to be silenced.
Look around. Cut through the bullshit. They do not want fans united against the ownership, so they will do whatever they can to divide opinion and fracture support.
We urge fans to unite, stay the course this time, no matter any previous differences. We can all go back to calling each other 𤬠after if needed. Fans are not the problem. We are not the problem.
One unified goal: the removal of this rotten ownership and inept executive team.
Follow the truth.
Tomorrow belongs to those who see it coming.
The 1958š¾šŖ
Might be an unpopular opinion, but win or lose FC26 isn't fun to play
Everyone literally runs some deep heavy drop back playstyle, infested with kick-offs and counters. It's IMPOSSIBLE to score outside the box so if you don't score off a counter, you're fucked.
It's a really unenjoyable game.
If Galatasaray have offered ā¬20m for Diogo Costa, then Man Utd should just bid ā¬30m and get the deal done.
Don't negotiate. Just go to their office all suited up and put the money on the table, shake hands, get Costa on a plane to Manchester and put him in goal against Fulham.