4. “That is not-not [randos] entering data to try to create a false signal.” = conjecture
5. “That does suggest a certain level of rigor in the VAERS reports.” = conjecture. The general category of profession of who enters the report says little about the quality of the report.
@BetterSkeptics#gtcentry Unsupported claim:
From: Bret and Heather 87th DarkHorse Podcast Livestream: We Must Drive this Virus to Extinction.
Timestamp: 1:28:30 (shown in 5th paragraph below timestamp 1:26:40 in transcript). See highlighted portion of screenshot.
3. Even if valid, the paper disclaims: “Because the sample is heavily biased - being made up only of those vaccinated early, namely the elderly, those with significant or chronic health conditions and frontline health service staff – the clinical results are not generalisable.”
@BetterSkeptics#gtchelp If a claim is based on a pre-print study, one that is not peer-reviewed (nor appears to have even been submitted for review), could that count as an unsupported claim?
@TeamYouTube - looks as if your AI needs to become a lot better at distinguishing between a FACT CHECK and misinformation! In the meantime, please re-instate @Potholer54T's fact checking video https://t.co/5iC0g7PkTn because it for sure did not violate any community guidelines!
@LFeldmanBarrett I LOVED reading HEAM & your interview w. @lexfridman. Left w. a lingering Q: what do you make of "emotional contagion" / "limbic resonance"? Can we pick up / share others' emotions / affect and feel them as our own or is it a myth?
“Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.” - Winston Churchill
#Repost betterangelsusa https://t.co/9D0d4ZUjfL
@kellymcgonigal finished The Upside of Stress & starting to feel empowered by the jitters :D . Any research / thoughts if stress mindsets affect digestion? Love your work!