Joyce Bignell

[Joyce Bignell @JoyceBignezi]

@blakjaxx I wonder if it will ever dawn on him that it is the same strategy they use on Harry and Meghan 🤔

[Qiyyah @Qiyyah18]

@YourMorning @AnneMarieAMK Anne-Marie, thank you for such a beautiful interview w/Charles Spencer. This past week he’s been battered by the🇬🇧media & what a gift you gave him & all of us by showing how Princess Diana’s love, kindness & care is her legacy.
https://t.co/T3m5I3gczj

[The House Of Montecito @blakjaxx]

Prince Harry spoke about his military experience during a surprise virtual address before the NATO Military Committee at their headquarters in Brussels on October 1.

[ELLE Decor @ELLEDECOR]

See Inside Tyler Perry’s 22.5-Acre Beverly Hills Estate Where Harry and Meghan Began Their California Life https://t.co/Gs6Q14w2DR

[Misan Harriman @misanharriman]

‘Poison Pen’ of the Press Killed Jason Arday, Misan Harriman Tells Sangita Myska @SangitaMyska

https://t.co/5lP7eCJVT3

[Grecia Parra @saltandleisure]

This is exactly the fallacy I’m speaking about: “analysis” based on assumptions, then presenting those assumptions as facts. You keep saying you’re analyzing “all the information available.” What information? I wasn’t aware Meghan had released As ever’s internal numbers.

Calling the marketing “objectively terrible” doesn’t magically make your personal opinion objective.
And “I tried the products and thought they were mid” is literally subjective. You didn’t like them. Fine. Other people do. A product not appealing to you doesn’t make its branding objectively bad or its collapse inevitable. I also wasn’t aware that liking and enjoying a specific food product suddenly makes someone a “super fan.” That’s just an attempt to dismiss anyone who disagrees with you.

And let me now give you some advice: if you want to be taken seriously, you have to behave like a professional. Whatever this is, it’s the opposite. If I were looking for credible royal reporting and came across your channel, only to find a constant fixation and meltdown over one American woman instead of substantive current and historical royal coverage, I would immediately look elsewhere.This Meghan-hate bandwagon will only take you so far. Sure, outrage can get you views and subscribers in the short term, but audiences and public sentiment change. They always do. And when the tide eventually turns, people will remember the level of venom you put on the record.

If you actually want longevity and credibility as a royal reporter, read history and learn from people who have maintained a level of class and integrity, while also being able to communicate their point of view without resorting to hate.

[Sonja Monique Supporter of Sussexes 🇯🇲🇬🇧 @Foxybrowning]

The 🇬🇧 racist media #DailyExpress and the trolls are really upset, they’re screaming, crying and saying “How dare she” and one troll had the cheek to say “it’s embarrassing.” What are we talking about? That picture of Pula carrying a #AsEver strawberry spread dog toy 🤦🏽‍♀️

What a bunch of f**king losers. It must be a slow day at the headquarters of the 🇬🇧 racist media.

Can we take a moment for Pula her flowers 💐 she made headlines news 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

[Quinn @Mikeedakid1]

Brittany from Royal News Network isn’t a royal expert. She’s not a commentator. She’s not “just giving her opinion.” She’s a woman who built a YouTube career on targeted hate—specifically, hate aimed at Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. This isn’t content. It’s obsession.

Go to her channel right now. Out of her last 50 uploads, over 70% are about Harry and Meghan. Not thoughtful analysis—just constant negativity, mocking, baiting, and smears. She doesn’t report. She fixates. She doesn’t critique. She attacks.

And let’s be blunt: if Meghan disappeared from public life tomorrow, Brittany would have nothing to talk about. No channel. No money. No engagement. She says Meghan should “go away,” but we all know she needs Meghan to stay. Meghan is her content strategy. Harry is her algorithm hack.

This isn’t about the monarchy—it’s about monetized hate.

Worse: Brittany is profiting off this obsession through @shopmy_us, pushing affiliate links while violating ShopMy’s own guidelines. Their rules ban hate speech, discrimination, and harassment—but Brittany’s content is built on all three. And yet, she’s allowed to monetize it.

Let’s be clear:
➡️ She mocks Meghan’s mental health
➡️ Undermines Harry’s military service
➡️ Drags their children into narratives
➡️ Incites trolls who echo her hate in the comments
➡️ Uses her platform to fuel race-based vitriol wrapped in faux concern

She has no inside access to the royal family. No unique insight. No qualifications. What she has is a target: Meghan. And what she’s built is a toxic echo chamber for people who want to watch a woman be torn down for leaving the monarchy and speaking her truth.

Brittany isn’t “reporting.” She’s farming outrage.

She isn’t “critiquing Meghan’s choices.” She’s fueling a campaign of ridicule against a biracial woman who married into a rigid white institution, spoke up, and walked away.

And here’s the part no one says out loud: She’s obsessed.

Obsessed with Meghan. Obsessed with Harry. Obsessed with attention. Obsessed with keeping her revenue up by feeding her followers more Meghan-hate content, day after day. It’s not just creepy—it’s dangerous.

This isn’t “just YouTube.” It’s hate for hire. And the platforms supporting her—@YouTube, @shopmy_us, @instagram—are complicit.

Royal News Network is not a commentary channel.

It’s a digital shrine to bitterness, envy, and hate. She blocked me for calling out her heat.

Shut it down.

#RoyalNewsNetwork #StopTheHate #MeghanMarkle #PrinceHarry #ToxicContent #ShopMyExposed

[VANITY FAIR FRANCE @VanityFairFR]

Meghan Markle pense déjà à Noël et dévoile son premier calendrier de l’Avent https://t.co/qCmbqI0hzY

[Agathe de Lili @AgathedeLili]

Charles's cruelty!👇🏾
He married the mistress he bullied late Diana with; then sacrificed Harry's mental health & well-being to seal deals that protect his mistress turned wife, while denying Harry any possibility to stand for his own right. Heartbreaking!
#KingCharlesTheCruel

[Agathe de Lili @AgathedeLili]

@sussexpodcast Remember the interloper article? Kate is compared to the Queen mother. Many articles say that woman was blatantly racist. Keep in mind that Rebecca English is part of Cambridges communication team. So she did that comparison because Kate wanted it. So yes, those two are racist.

[Jamie Harding @jhardingAL]

💯

[Qiyyah @Qiyyah18]

@ValleyGirl629 @FamilyLuvsDGS I bet the restaurant renames these two dishes on the menu to the “Sussex haddock and the chicken ham & leek pie”.
It is insane that a media outlet went to a restaurant, asked what they ate & them wrote an article about it.

[The House Of Montecito @blakjaxx]

The media are giddy over the first sighting of Harry and Meghan together since they moved to the England

[✨ Ed 🤦🏽‍♂️ ✨ @eddluxe]

Now WAIT A DAMN MINUTE!!

WHY is this the first I’m hearing about this “rumor” that then Prince Charles got caught getting a blow job from his valet and that Diana supposedly said Charles was in love with him??

[Royally Shady @Royallyshady1]

He’s use to climbing behind someone…. I mean something.

#princewilliam

[ÈFŪRÛ II ® ™ @realfranzprusse]

The sad Piss Moron aka Piers Morgan is always trying to insert himself into every royal story

[Kaiser@Celebitchy @KaiseratCB]

Princess Eugenie’s inscribed copy of Meghan’s ‘The Bench’ was on sale on eBay https://t.co/X9S4Q7T4Sh

[Monika Ola @monikaola2025]

All the family are racist.
Eugene and Beatrice picked a side when Kate made them wear red to the Christmas candlelight thingy she does.

They were playing both sides and now that they depend on William’s good graces to get money from the crown, they can’t be side with Harry

[Ange Andrews @andrews_ange]

Thank you @holydisrupter for letting us know how petty and a hater of a human being you are! You are mistaken. We supporters of Harry&Meghan have raised more than $300K for charity inspired by H&M! I cannot participate in ur hate calendar. U r not a Christian!