@monthly Yes, that's certainly one way to put it. Need to solve some political problem? Let's just conjure up a doctrine to get rid of it. "Why I can call spirits from the vasty deep." But on these occasions they really do come.
On the 250th anniversary of American independence, the Roberts Court has found a way to commemorate it: by gutting the Voting Rights Act. @JRakove, a historian of the founding era, on what's really being nullified. https://t.co/7dudlIW17v
Hard to imagine a more moronic statement. For one thing, the vast majority of Jewish Democrats still fault Netanyahu for goading the GOP majorities in Congress to invite him to speak there in opposition to Obama's Iran policy.
@M_H_Taylor I wonder if one could approximate that by correspondence, given that recipients often note which prior letters they have received and sometimes when when they reply in turn.
@M_H_Taylor Being a pure text guy I've never had to use it, but I had fun showing it to my grandson.
Maybe I should develop a map one day demonstrating how long it took delegates to make to their way from their home residence to the Continental Congress or the Constitutional Convention.
My contribution to the In Pursuit series being conducted by Colleen Shogan, the former national Archivist. My main idea is not to debate whether JM was father of the Constitution but to describe him instead as the leading strategist of constitutional reform in the 1780s.
Jack Rakove's (@JRakove) essay on James Madison traces the careful, often unglamorous work that made the Constitution stick.
Madison shaped the agenda in Philadelphia, kept ratification from unraveling into a second convention, and pushed the Bill of Rights through the First Congress despite his own reservations about it.
The goal throughout was the same: a process the public would accept as final.
One could argue about this proposition over coffee, I suppose.
But more important than Trump v. U.S.? Or Dobbs v. Marsh? Or the legacy of Shelby County and its progeny and the systematic effort of the Roberts court to destroy the Voting Right Act? Gimme a break!
On the constitutional side: the Framers' main justification for the Unitary Executive was the principle of responsibility (more than vigor, energy, and dispatch). That is a concept that Trump has never understood and could never accept or perform. Someone else is always to blame.