Jerry Schlund

Attempting to find the rational in an irrational world.

[Jerry Schlund @JSchlund]

@libsoftiktok You don't know me from Adam but, as a child, come talk to me about your sexual desires and sexual identity.

[Jerry Schlund @JSchlund]

@BhattiLaib9960 Not afraid. They just aren't sexually attracted to members of the same sex.

[Jerry Schlund @JSchlund]

@girlsbian_ Tell me you don't have a clue as to what the definition of male / female is without saying you don't have a clue.

[Jerry Schlund @JSchlund]

@itsrosesm I believe murderers belong in jail.

[Jerry Schlund @JSchlund]

@zeitclip Sad to see a major voice like Hotep Jesus advocate for black men to be uncivilized violent savages.

[Jerry Schlund @JSchlund]

In which of the following situations would we expect to see heightened security and anticipate riots?
1) White teen kills black teen -not guilty
2) White teen kills black teen - guilty
3) Black teen kills white teen - not guilty
4) Black teen kills white teen - guilty

[Jerry Schlund @JSchlund]

@TPostMillennial Is it really "both sides"?

[Jerry Schlund @JSchlund]

@libsoftiktok @McMSchools I can remember when we thought exposing high school kids to adult male's sexual fetishes wasn't a good thing.

[Jerry Schlund @JSchlund]

@BLKThugreport Sub-human savages.

[Jerry Schlund @JSchlund]

@libsoftiktok We use to keep the sexual fetishes of grown men away from children.

[Jerry Schlund @JSchlund]

@MrAndyNgo We used to arrest perverts who wanted to expose children to adult sexual practices and fetishes.

[Jerry Schlund @JSchlund]

@NBCNews Complete and utter lie. It was not a civil right rally. It was a BLM riot with millions of dollars of damages & businesses burned to the ground. He didn't "open fire", he fired in self-defense.

[Jerry Schlund @JSchlund]

@libsoftiktok When your identity is defined by your sexual desires this is what you will get.

[Jerry Schlund @JSchlund]

@WesternLensman Pelley rants and raves at a major university how freedom of speech is under attack. I don't think he understands that is ability to rant and rave at a major university proves that the freedom of speech is alive and well in the USA.

[Jerry Schlund @JSchlund]

@JebraFaushay A safe place based on the sexual desires of adults?

[Jerry Schlund @JSchlund]

@libsoftiktok @StoonPubSchools I am unable to understand why a community would accept a school that wants to involve little children in the sexual desires of adults.

[Jerry Schlund @JSchlund]

@WesternLensman If Joe would have beat Trump the Dems would have never removed him from the ticket. She is delusional, not as bad as Joe but still...

[Art @ZarkFiles]

The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.

Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.

[Jerry Schlund @JSchlund]

@AntiWokeMemes Child abuser

[Jerry Schlund @JSchlund]

@JeanIsWitherin Obviously a list created by the far left.