baron

[baron @JueLan5]

@Jhallacher channel name: NewsmakersWithJR

[baron @JueLan5]

$SOC

Assembly member Greg Hart, in an youtube interview, says that “i have been assured by government staff that final approval from fire marshal … will not happen until after the coastal commission takes action” 5:17 in the video

https://t.co/mmWwdBUUKz

[baron @JueLan5]

@BR_Kelleran

[baron @JueLan5]

i’m long Sable - just sharing information and highlighting risks. Similar things happened before where a fire marshal public hearing was promised before state waiver, but never happened.

@JasonStrom_ @WishyWishing @basadomente

[baron @JueLan5]

@FastTradeKing @WishyWishing I've watched through the archive video link: https://t.co/qBRdgDH15R

However, around -3:16:00 video time, the item voted jumped from #233 to #250 directly, without a floor vote on item #235 (the offshore oil spills piece related to Sable)

so i'm curious whether/how it passed?

[baron @JueLan5]

@MidwestHedgie @Seawolfcap @PhilMickelson If I were the environment group, I’d argue for a TRO in the 10 day restart window that
1. restart is a violation of CCC PI, for reasons above
2. CDP is one of the necessary permits, especially given the ongoing litigation and PI

[baron @JueLan5]

@MidwestHedgie @Seawolfcap @PhilMickelson 2. The EDC PI stated “all necessary permits” are required before restarting the pipeline. It’s unclear whether CDP is required or not. Even the consent degree doesn’t preclude other necessary permits.

[baron @JueLan5]

@MidwestHedgie @Seawolfcap @PhilMickelson I share similar concerns. I’m long but wanted to argue from shorts perspective to test the thesis.

There are several hurdles to overcome for Sable: