Highlander Girl 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 🚜

Highlander Girl 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 🚜

[Agent P @AgentP22]

It's a good question.

[James Woods @RealJamesWoods]

If sanity is ever restored to the UK, Tommy Robinson should be knighted as a savior of the realm. Without his relentless reportage and activism, the madness of the Starmer tyranny would never have been exposed.

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

🚨LEAKED🎙️

LABOUR PARTY COUNCILLOR CAUGHT ON MIC SAYING SHE WANTS PEOPLE ARRESTED FOR PUTTING UP BRITISH FLAGS 🇬🇧

"Can we trace them on social media?"
"Can Police not lie in wait and nab the B*STARDS?"

Labour party are the fascists

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

ENGLAND: A Palestinian refugee from Gaza, who arrived claiming to be fleeing a ‘genocide’, was arrested for attempting to rape a 14-year-old girl.

He defended himself: “According to Sharia law, raping a non-Muslim girl is legal. I only follow Allah and Sharia law.”

Pure evil!

[Jason | 🇬🇧 🇿🇦 🇮🇱🇺🇲 @Ajaon_of_All]

Let me categorically Debunk this utter rot. @sainsburys.

I am a poultry Breeder. The hens that lay white eggs (Amberline/White Star) DO NOT have a lower carbon footprint.

Yes they eat a bit less and produce roughly the same amount of eggs as the Brown egg layers (Bovan/Lowman/ISA Brown) but they live shorter lives, are prone to dying suddenly when startled, a flighty and nervous and because they live shorter productive lives (12 -18mnths) vs brown 18/24mnths (both commercial farmed), you have to incubate more which is increased (Electricity/gas costs) and their eggs are not the same quality.

I breed and keep 20+ different breeds, including: ISA Brown hens and White Stars. All my hens are 100% free range, Not a single barn kept bird, I have ISA browns that are 5yrs old and still laying beautiful Brown eggs, I have not seen a White star live beyond 3yrs and certainly none have laid eggs past 18-24mnths.
White stars Lay themselves to death. They are slender birds and because they dont eat a lot, it drains their personal vitality to keep up laying the eggs you want to sell because of the nonsensical lie that they are "More Carbon Neutral"

You want to know about eggs, come talk to someone like me, Don't rely on some hairbrained imagination of a buyer who's trying to squeeze the profit margin for a few extra pennies at our expense and to the poor hens detriment.

[Pete Sanford @PeteSanford]

BOVAER: COW KILLER DATA TODAY

HUMAN KILLER DATA LATER

Full PPE to Handle Bovaer

Fertility Risks for Farm Workers

First Signs of Toxicities in Herds in Denmark

• digestive disorders
• metabolic issues
• reduced feed intake
• reduced milk yield
• behavioural changes
• fertility irregularities in some herds

This is one of the most important developments in the entire Bovaer story, and it happened because real‑world farm data did not match the original controlled‑trial data.

🟩 Why EFSA Reopened the Bovaer Safety Review (2026)

EFSA (the European Food Safety Authority) reopened the safety assessment of Bovaer for two reasons:

⭐ 1. Denmark reported widespread cow‑health problems after Bovaer rollout

⭐ 2. EFSA realised the original approval relied on short, controlled trials that did not reflect real‑world farm conditions

Let’s break each one down.

🟦 1. The Danish Trigger: Health Problems in ~25% of Bovaer‑Using Farms

When Denmark rolled out Bovaer across dairy herds, farmers began reporting:

• digestive disorders
• metabolic issues
• reduced feed intake
• reduced milk yield
• behavioural changes
• fertility irregularities in some herds

The Danish Veterinary and Food Administration (DVFA) analysed the reports and found:

Around one quarter of the 1,600 farms using Bovaer had notable health issues temporally associated with its introduction.

This does not prove causation — but the scale and consistency were enough to raise a red flag.

Denmark then formally notified EFSA.

This is what triggered the review.

🟦 2. EFSA realised the original safety file had gaps

The original EFSA approval (2022) was based on:

• short‑term trials
• small numbers of cows
• controlled, idealised conditions
• no multi‑lactation studies
• no large‑scale field data
• no cumulative environmental modelling
• no long‑term reproductive studies

In other words:

Bovaer was approved based on “laboratory‑style” data, not real‑farm data.

Once Denmark provided real‑world evidence, EFSA had to reassess.

🟦 3. Specific concerns EFSA is now re‑examining

EFSA’s reopened review focuses on:

🔹 A. Safety for dairy cows under real‑world feeding conditions

Including:

• long‑term digestive effects
• metabolic stress
• rumen microbiome shifts
• interactions with different feed types
• effects on high‑yielding cows

🔹 B. Safety for breeding cows

This is important because:

• original studies used non‑breeding cows
• reproductive effects were not fully assessed
• 3‑NOP is classified as “suspected of damaging fertility” for workers

EFSA wants to ensure no reproductive impacts occur in cows.

🔹 C. Dose‑response uncertainty

Some Danish farms used:

• slightly higher doses
• continuous feeding
• different feed mixes

EFSA is checking whether small deviations increase risk.

🔹 D. Cumulative effects

Daily use for years may have:

• rumen effects
• metabolic effects
• microbiome effects

These were not studied originally.

🟦 4. Why this is scientifically significant

This is the first time EFSA has reopened a feed‑additive safety file after rollout, not before approval.

It signals:

• the original data was insufficient
• real‑world effects may differ from trials
• regulators are concerned about scale‑up risks
• the safety margin may be narrower than assumed

This is extremely rare in EU regulatory history.

A HEALTH DISASTER INCOMING?

YES…

[James Melville 🚜 @JamesMelville]

More than 100 new datacentres in the UK plan to burn gas to generate electricity, some potentially doing so permanently.

▪️No net zero for the data centres.

▪️Net zero enforced on us plebs (probably to enable the data centres to burn more energy).

The whole thing is a scam.

[John Cleese @JohnCleese]

I disagree

He's much worse then that

[No Farmers, No Food @NoFarmsNoFoods]

Absolutely ridiculous.
🤡🌍🥚

[Neil Oliver @thecoastguy]

The controlled demolition of the country takes all forms.

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

Henry Nowak’s sister has posted a heartbreaking video of their bond as siblings…

Henry Nowak died because was a victim of anti-white HATRED

SHAME on the disgusting U.K. Police and Politicians that treat white people as SECOND CLASS CITIZENS

[James Melville 🚜 @JamesMelville]

This 600MW AI data centre is proposed on scenic farmland by the village of Auchtertool, between Kircaldy and Cowdenbeath in Fife.

The size of the data centre enormous and as you can see from the maps, it dwarfs the neighbouring village of Auchertool.

It has been calculated that this data centre will use the same amount of energy in a year than half of Scotland’s households, or 20% of Scotland’s total energy use. So the energy use of Achtertool data centre when built will use in a year the same energy as 1.34 million households – or 53% of Scottish households.

There will now be a period of three to four weeks consultation period when the public can comment or object to the planning application. Here’s the online link to leave a comment:

https://t.co/E1r9FxVNRj

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

Holy shit.

Tommy Robinson states that the U.K. Police Forces have been indoctrinated and are ordered to treat white people as second-class citizens as per their training manuals…

“Did Henry look like White Privilege as he was laying on the floor…?”

[Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 @TRobinsonNewEra]

Deport

[@ChatsWithEm @chatswithem]

Agenda2030

Their stretch target is for people to eat NO MEAT or Dairy

They don't want people to fly more than once every 3years

They don't want private car ownership

They even have a target of you only buying a few pieces of new clothing a year.

Seriously.

This is Marxism on steroids dressed as being good and concerned for the environment...

And don't forget whilst they want to push this dystopia

At the same time , they are building enormous data centres in beautiful areas of nature and destroying swathes of flora and fauna , which require a country sized amount of energy and water.

These people are DANGEROUS FRAUDS-who want to control us all whilst making a fortune

The damage they have caused to this country in 2 years is immense.

https://t.co/2x9oC9ypr2

[Pete Sanford @PeteSanford]

BOVAER: PART 2.0

JUST THE TIP OF A VERY NASTY CHEMICAL ICEBERG:

Supermarkets tell us milk is “fresh”, “simple”, “natural”.

But they never tell us what the cows are actually fed.

Behind the scenes: bakery waste, chemical preservatives, synthetic nitrogen (urea), ethanol by‑products, ionophores, mould‑binders… and now methane‑suppressing additives like Bovaer.

None of this appears on the label.

Families deserve transparency.

If supermarkets can list every ingredient in a loaf of bread:

Why can’t they list what’s fed to the cows that make our milk?

What supermarkets don’t tell you about cattle feed:

We imagine cows eating grass.

Supermarkets encourage that image — rolling fields, sunshine, happy cows.

But modern dairy feed is a complex mix of:

• Bakery waste
• Distillers grains
• Urea (synthetic nitrogen fertiliser)
• Ionophores
• Chemical preservatives
• Mycotoxin binders
• Buffers
• Enzymes
• Bovaer

None of this appears on milk labels.

Not even in the “sourcing” pages on supermarket websites.

Supermarkets know consumers care about additives.

They label everything in human food…

but zero transparency on animal feed.

If feed additives are safe

If they’re beneficial

If they’re essential…

Why hide them?

Families deserve honesty.

We shouldn’t need to dig through agricultural journals to know what’s entering the food chain.

Transparency builds trust.
Silence destroys it.

3. SUPERMARKET‑BY‑SUPERMARKET TRANSPARENCY BREAKDOWN:

Tesco

• Provides “grass‑fed” imagery
• No disclosure of feed additives
• No mention of Bovaer or ionophores
• Organic range is the only one with feed transparency

Sainsbury’s

• Similar to Tesco
• No feed ingredient lists
• No disclosure of preservatives, binders, or rumen modifiers

Asda

• No feed transparency
• No mention of additives
• No sourcing detail beyond “British milk”

Morrisons

• Strong on “British farming” branding
• Weak on feed transparency
• No additive disclosure

Waitrose

• Better welfare standards
• Still no full feed ingredient list
• No disclosure of Bovaer or other rumen modifiers

Aldi / Lidl

• No feed transparency
• No additive disclosure
• No sourcing detail beyond “British”

Co‑op

• Ethical branding
• Still no feed transparency
• No additive disclosure

Conclusion:

Every major UK supermarket lists ingredients for human food.

None list ingredients for the feed that produces milk, cheese, yoghurt, butter, or beef.

This is the Transparency Gap.

What’s missing...

• Labels
• Transparency
• Consumer choice
• Informed consent
• Public awareness

LACK OF INFORMATION = LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY

[Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 @TRobinsonNewEra]

The police now in riot gear defending the Digwa family home from the public.

If only they'd showed this amount of care for Henry!!

[John Cleese @JohnCleese]

Good

[Pete Sanford @PeteSanford]

NICOLA STURGEON WELCOMED BOVAER MANUFACTURER DSM Firmenich to SCOTLAND.

Absolutely True. See Photos.

[Mark Dagnall @dagnall_mark]

@PeteSanford @AlBion4sure This needs prosecution of Arla directors personally for distributing and poisoning the food supply with a known carcinogen. This is why Labour want to give kids free breakfast, it is why they pushed it so hard, they want them all taking a daily dose of cancer riddled milk.