Lee Rigby's family didn't want his death to be used to divide people
Henry Nowak's family didn't want his death to be used to divide people
Stephen Ogilvie's family doesn't want his attack to be used to divide people
But the far-right 'patriots' always disrespect their wishes
Inevitably, the government is exploiting the horrific attack in Belfast to justify censorship.
The previous government did the same after the murder of Sir David Amess.
They never want to address the problem; they only want to prevent people from talking about the problem.
Utter utter bollocks. Britain was not defeated in 1940. This is tiresome non-history.
Read a decent book, rather than making stuff up Peter.
Here’s one I’d recommend:
https://t.co/5QVWvPIhmS
Iain Dale left stunned by calm caller on LBC
A composed caller named Mike told Iain Dale on LBC that Britain “will remain almost ungovernable until we have mass deportations”.
The exchange was striking because the caller spoke in measured tones, clearly articulating a view held by millions of people across the country. Yet Iain struggled to process it, repeatedly falling back on “you can’t do that”.
Mike highlighted the obvious disconnect: the British public have consistently voted for lower immigration, only for politicians to deliver record levels instead.
“There’s a massive disconnect between the political class and the people of this country,” he said. “We never gave any consent to this and there’s certainly no mandate for the scale of immigration we’ve seen.”
When Iain pushed back, saying you can’t deport people here perfectly legally, the caller was unflinching:
Caller: “You mean end indefinite leave to remain?”
Iain: “You can do that for future people but you can’t do that for people who have already got it. That would be outrageous.”
Caller: “Yeah you can. Of course you can.”
Iain: “From a fairness point of view, you can’t suddenly tell people who’ve got a perfect legal right to be here that we’re changing the rules now…”
Caller: “You can, Iain.”
Iain: “Well you can do that but is that really the kind of country you want to live in?”
Caller: “Yes!”
Iain continued to argue that you can’t “take it out on perfectly legal, law-abiding people”, clearly unable to grasp how widespread this frustration has become.
The public didn’t always feel this way. Years of politicians ignoring the public on immigration have shifted attitudes dramatically. As the caller made clear, people never voted for this transformation and the consequences of fixing it now rest with those who created the problem.
Well worth a listen. The gap between Westminster and the rest of the country has rarely been clearer.
Flee to a country for safety, and then feel intimidated by staff wearing it's flag? What an absolute load of leftist, over-emotional and sinister nonsense.
https://t.co/jZMuIM28SY
A Conservative poster from the 2005 election campaign.
How different might things in Britain be today if the immigration debate the Tories tried to have 21 years ago had taken place instead of being so ruthlessly demonised by Blair?
Somewhere in the bowels of the British deep state tonight officials are activating another of their distraction "don't-look-back-in-anger" plans to placate the plebs.
Not going to work.
🚨BBC: Asylum seekers "are more likely to commit crime".
We first published our research last year on the link between open borders and crime. The BBC was silent.
They have now been forced by reality - kicking and screaming - to report our findings and admit the link.
I can't prove this, but I'm beyond convinced the British state pressures families of victims into putting out these robotic statements.
This reads like it was written by a crisis management lawyer or a politician, not by a normal family whose loved one was nearly beheaded.
Correct, @alexburghart. However, he *did* come to this country, and he then got ILR. This happened when your party was in government. It failed to take the steps necessary to give us the right to return him and others in similar situations to their home country