The Nobel Committee has not lost its moral compass..
It has simply declined to treat the rejection of one government’s preferred narrative as an automatic disqualification.
Navi Pillay’s decades of work, defending anti-apartheid prisoners including Nelson Mandela, serving as President of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (where her jurisprudence helped establish sexual violence as a crime against humanity and genocide), and later as UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, LONG predate any inquiry into Gaza.
Reducing that record to “inventing and propagating blood libels against the one and only Jewish state” is not analysis. It is a deliberate rhetorical escalation that equates a UN Commission of Inquiry’s findings with medieval ritual-murder accusations. Those findings can be contested on evidence and methodology; they do not become antisemitic forgeries merely because they are unwelcome.
The further claim that her “proudest achievement was to legitimize a corrupt prosecutor” collapses separate institutions into a conspiracy for which no evidence is offered.
Pillay chaired a UN Human Rights Council commission. Karim Khan pursued ICC warrants on the basis of the Prosecutor’s own investigation.
There is no documented link showing she “supplied the lies” for him to “weaponize,” nor that he sought those warrants to outrun misconduct allegations.
Those allegations, resulting in findings of sexual harassment and his removal by ICC member states, are real and stand on their own evidence. They do not rewrite a separate commission’s report.
The statement’s pattern is familiar: treat any accountability mechanism that reaches Israeli officials as inherently illegitimate, label its participants bigots, and present the resulting isolation as proof of a global lynch mob rather than of contested facts about civilian casualties and official statements.
Your skilled hyperbole about “blood libels” does not refute the broader record. It simply refuses to engage it.
In other words, nobody cares for, or asked your opinion. Gaza is empty for it..
Go pound more sand.
The brochure calls it a pinhole camera. The specification sheet, unusually honest, lists privacy protection as “No support.”
The lens is 3.7 millimetres. The manners are surely smaller?
It is marketed as care for the child, the pet, and the parcel. It is built to vanish into a smoke detector, a charger, or a teddy bear. A camera designed to hide inside a toy is not for supervising the toy.
Night vision that does not glow, a microphone, and an application so strangers may watch a room whose occupant thinks she is alone: this is sold as remote viewing. It is attendance without invitation.
In China the same class of device has already appeared in rental bathrooms and hospital rooms, footage included. The shopping cart remains open.
A doorbell sees. This product’s distinction is that the person being seen does not know there is anything to see. The password is often still the factory’s. The sheet never promised privacy.
On that point, the manufacturers were the only truthful party in the room.
Funny how that works.
The brochure calls it a pinhole camera. The specification sheet, unusually honest, lists privacy protection as “No support.”
The lens is 3.7 millimetres. The manners are surely smaller?
It is marketed as care for the child, the pet, and the parcel. It is built to vanish into a smoke detector, a charger, or a teddy bear. A camera designed to hide inside a toy is not for supervising the toy.
Night vision that does not glow, a microphone, and an application so strangers may watch a room whose occupant thinks she is alone: this is sold as remote viewing. It is attendance without invitation.
In China the same class of device has already appeared in rental bathrooms and hospital rooms, footage included. The shopping cart remains open.
A doorbell sees. This product’s distinction is that the person being seen does not know there is anything to see. The password is often still the factory’s. The sheet never promised privacy.
On that point, the manufacturers were the only truthful party in the room.
Magnificent!
The opposition heard that a frame was available for download and immediately deployed the cyber division, which, on arrival, appears to have asked you to tick a box confirming you are not a robot! Once!
The site survived. History will record this as the afternoon the enemy was shaken by a verification prompt.
One can only imagine the war room. Maps on the wall. A red string connecting “I am Voting EFF” to the nation’s critical infrastructure. Someone whispering that the frames are still downloadable and receiving the news like a casualty report.
Asijiki, indeed: no retreat from the landing page, no surrender to the cookie notice.
By all means proceed to the website. Should it ask you to prove you are human, remain calm. That is not the enemy. That is the internet, performing its single remaining party trick.
@zilevandamme It is to persuade a subset of eligible people that the effort is futile or unlawful, so they stay home..
The mechanism you describe is real, and it can be blunted, though not abolished.
In other words - MARKETING
It is "acceptable" election interference, I guess.
Naturally.
Because nothing inspires confidence like a medical chart assembled from nine identical skin circles and a stationery cupboard of clip-art arthropods?
Observe the scientific rigour. The mosquito has been granted a modest red dot, which is considerate of it. The ant receives a slightly crosser dot. The tick, famous for quietly installing itself and departing with a disease, is depicted as a mild tan.
One assumes the tick apologised on the way out?
Should the mark on your leg fail to match any panel, the protocol is clear: select the insect you dislike most and proceed directly to unfounded certainty.
@RT_com No, they dont look like thieves. Way to casual. No one bailing after all that noise?
That spotlight might have been a nuisance every night to the neighbors trying to get sleep.. chances are thís was the escalation after the conversation.
@OvO10072327 The bystanders do nothing to stop the abuse of this women?? They stand there and laugh? Shameful! Is this acceptable in #Chinese culture?
@ChineseEmbinUS
You burst onto my timeline with profanities and expletives? Look at my timeline... I keep the junk in the trashcan. You realize you are on social media right??
Pertaining to "Brigitte Macron", I am siding with Narfissa. You have to be living in a bubble if you can not see with your own eyes.
Candace Owens is one of the few out there risking her life with what she has exposed. Chances are she will end up like William Cooper, God forbid.
Just talk respectfully to others, please.
@RetroGirlLife A Morrison poem often works like a rite rather than a statement, as in: image, incantation, sudden blackout.. 🧿🧿🧿
The rock-star myth is the least interesting part to me.
Forever the man 👽
Would someone close to @CyrilRamaphosa usefully interrupt the Heritage Day liturgy long enough to explain a modest point?
A heritage worth handing on is not merely an indexed catalogue of wounds, updated annually and presented as national purpose.
The harder inheritance is less theatrical, Mr President. It is a country that remembers accurately, then governs as if the future is still available.
Under @MYANC stewardship that future has been treated as optional. The record is not a debate topic. It is a long, public exhibit.
South Africa has been a democracy since 1994. The same movement that led the struggle has governed for most of that time.
When schools still fail to produce competence, municipalities fold like wet cardboard, violent crime remains a daily tax, and unemployment remains among the highest in the world, “apartheid did this to us” stops being history. It becomes a management technique: decline responsibility, then request applause for remembering why one declined it.
The ANC top brass have made this into a specialism. Memory is summoned when results are required. Results are postponed when memory will suffice.
BUT WAIT! There has been a further achievement.
This message today in politics has hardened the resolve of Afrikaners, a people not famous for surrendering their identity, and not obliged to apologise for wanting a place in the same sun their forefathers worked.
They, too, are South Africans.
Heritage that cannot accommodate that fact is not unity. It is a speech.
@Frasier_Quotes Roz was admittedly the series cougar up to when she got pregnant and her motherhood instinct kicked in.
Her character development was exceptionally well written.
The cores now coming out of the ground will settle whether there is unusual organic material at depth, I guess.
They will not, by themselves, settle the name on the hull. That remains a matter of faith or of future finds that have not yet appeared.
You gave an honest reply, because we don't KNOW yet, but I sure wish it is what we think it is
Maybe a more economical and obvious explanation is that an advertising agency discovered that turning a human being into a Mini Fillet generates more conversation than another shot of steam rising from a bucket.
Conspiracy theorists, for their part, remain convinced that the Davos set is being breaded, eleven herbs and spices at a time, and served with a side of coleslaw.
If the elites were truly on the menu, the pricing would be different. A secret-society sandwich would not be available on a two-piece meal deal..