Jake Gruber

[Jake Gruber @JusticeDrakeG]

@Zigmanfreud @bodyblock wow, that's weak reasoning. Entirely insufficient to ensure the integrity of a system that literally determines the existence of the country.

[Jake Gruber @JusticeDrakeG]

@Liberta_Massimo @Zigmanfreud Came here to say this. ABC and NBC would've pre-empted coverage during the SUPERBOWL if Obama was on talking about Russian collusion.

[Jake Gruber @JusticeDrakeG]

@RealJamesWoods Recall in October 2020, when General Milley went behind Trump's back to assure the Chinese that Trump would not attack them after the election. WHY would he need to have that conversation?

[Jake Gruber @JusticeDrakeG]

@amsinger_k10 @CletaMitchell @realDonaldTrump It really looked like there was a deal in 2020 along the lines of "you guys keep Susan Collins, we get Biden."

[Jake Gruber @JusticeDrakeG]

@EricLDaugh I don't know Ossoff's normal body language, but here it reads as scared. Petrified, actually. But maybe that's his baseline.

[Gad Saad @GadSaad]

Do you know why I'm pissed off on this July 4th? Because I'm seeing the greatest country in the history of the world increasingly bathing in the infinity pool of parasitic suicidal empathy (as has occurred with much of the West). PLEASE activate your inner honey badger and defend American freedom. Do not take American Exceptionalism for granted. Fight! Fight! Fight!

[AP @Average_NY_Guy]

The way so many people reacted to Mamdani’s disgraceful speech on America’s 250th Independence Day explains exactly why he and his movement keep winning.

“His speech was a miscalculation.”
“He’ll regret giving that speech.”
“We can’t let him get away with it.”

Are you people still not getting it?

That speech wasn’t a mistake. It wasn’t a blunder. It was the message.

Did you honestly expect him to celebrate America this year? Or next year? This is who he is. This is the movement. They despise America’s history, values, and identity. They’re not hiding it. They’re telling you exactly what they believe.

The frightening part isn’t the speech. It’s watching people on our side convince themselves it was some kind of political error instead of recognizing it for exactly what it was.

As long as people keep pretending this is anything other than a movement fundamentally opposed to the America we know, they’ll keep winning. You can’t defeat a threat you refuse to acknowledge.

[Jake Gruber @JusticeDrakeG]

@DebMacK @GadSaad @BananaKingCo Retard

[Jake Gruber @JusticeDrakeG]

@GhostofBiased @GilmanHill Thank you for participating in this intelligence test. I now know where to bucket all of your subsequent opinions.

[The Joe @TheJoe746]

Imagine being mad that Elon Musk is now a trillionaire...

And being okay with California's trillions of dollars in fraud. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[Jake Gruber @JusticeDrakeG]

@KurtSchlichter Stupid. And a hackneyed cliche.

[Jake Gruber @JusticeDrakeG]

@PrezLives2022 Classic Commie: better for it not to exist at all. Which it didn't, before Starlink.

[Jake Gruber @JusticeDrakeG]

@DissentFu @LORDLJS You sound like a low T loser DUDE, that's why

[Jake Gruber @JusticeDrakeG]

@Jerkstore723 @DissentFu And judging by the comments, not just FINANCIALLY illiterate.

[Jake Gruber @JusticeDrakeG]

@caffshepherd @DissentFu It's gotta be parody, right? Nobody would willingly expose themselves as THIS retarded if it wasn't a joke. Would they?

[Jake Gruber @JusticeDrakeG]

@DissentFu @_noderoom Are you parody? Because if not.... Hahahaha, you're retarded.

[Kevin Bass @kevinnbass]

Growing up is realizing that Ayn Rand went through what we are going through. Everything she wrote was about that. Generations of "educated" people made fun of her. But she was right. She knew what was coming. The West laughed. It should have listened.

[Jake Gruber @JusticeDrakeG]

When I first read about what became Orch-OR around 2002, it struck me intuitively as absolutely correct. I knew it was considered fringe at the time, but the brain as a quantum machine simply explained so much more about reality than classical processes ever could. I'm so pleased to see the evidence emerge over the last few years, and I look forward to the day when this "radical" idea is considered by grade school children everywhere as being just obvious.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Je vais partir du principe que tu es de bonne foi, parce que ton raisonnement est intuitif et que 90% des gens le partagent. Mais il repose sur trois erreurs factuelles, et ça vaut le coup de les regarder calmement.

Erreur 1 : la fortune d'Elon n'est pas un tas d'argent. C'est de la propriété d'usines, de fusées et de satellites. "Prendre la moitié de sa tune", concrètement, ça veut dire forcer la vente de la moitié de SpaceX et Tesla. L'argent ne sort pas d'un coffre, il sort des entreprises elles-mêmes, qui passent sous contrôle de fonds étrangers ou d'États. Tu ne redistribues pas du cash, tu démantèles un outil de production. C'est la différence entre récolter des pommes et découper le pommier.

Erreur 2 : "ça résout énormément de problèmes dans le monde". Cette expérience a déjà été tentée, en vrai. En 2021, le directeur du Programme Alimentaire Mondial de l'ONU a affirmé que 6 milliards de Musk pouvaient "résoudre la faim dans le monde". Réponse d'Elon : décrivez-moi exactement comment, comptabilité publique à l'appui, et je vends mes actions Tesla immédiatement. Le PAM a publié son plan. Verdict : ce n'était pas "résoudre la faim", c'était nourrir 42 millions de personnes pendant un an. Un an. Puis il faut re-payer, pour toujours. Le PAM avait d'ailleurs levé 8,4 milliards l'année précédente, et la faim était toujours là. Les ONG traitent les symptômes en boucle, jamais les causes, parce que leur financement dépend de l'existence du problème.

Erreur 3, la plus importante : tu cherches ce qui sort vraiment les gens de la pauvreté. Bonne nouvelle, on a la réponse, et elle est massive. En 1990, 36% de l'humanité vivait dans l'extrême pauvreté. Aujourd'hui, moins de 9%. Plus d'un milliard de personnes sorties de la misère en 30 ans. Par quoi ? Pas par la charité ni par l'aide internationale (plus de 1 000 milliards versés à l'Afrique en 60 ans pour un résultat à peu près nul). Par l'ouverture des marchés, l'industrialisation, le commerce. La Chine seule a sorti 800 millions de personnes de la pauvreté en abandonnant le collectivisme, pas en taxant ses entrepreneurs.

Donc fais le calcul complet. Option A : tu confisques 500 milliards, tu finances quelques années de programmes, l'argent est consommé, et tu as détruit la machine qui produisait les fusées, les voitures électriques et l'internet des zones rurales. Option B : tu laisses le meilleur allocateur de capital de sa génération réinvestir 100% de sa fortune dans des industries qui baissent les coûts pour tout le monde et emploient des centaines de milliers de personnes. L'option A soulage ta morale pendant 18 mois. L'option B sort des populations entières de la pauvreté pour toujours.

La pauvreté ne se redistribue pas. Elle se résout par la création. C'est contre-intuitif, c'est frustrant, mais c'est ce que disent 200 ans de données.