JW Littooy

- Classic Cars, Cycling, Conservative politics, Photography

[bokensha @iambokensha]

@pubity

[SaltyGoat @SaltyGoat17]

A Capitalist sees someone doing better then they are and they ask:

"What are they doing that I can learn from?"

A Socialist sees the same person"

"You owe me because this is unfair!!"

Capitalism cultivates ingenuity while Socialism only gives you Bitterness and Animosity...

[JW Littooy @JwLittooy]

@H08BIT 9903

[JW Littooy @JwLittooy]

@MinJi_220 99

[JW Littooy @JwLittooy]

@mervee777_ 35

[JW Littooy @JwLittooy]

@Polymarket The expected tax revenue LOSS for CA is $24BN if the “billionaire tax passes”.

[JW Littooy @JwLittooy]

@itsm_hope 005

[JW Littooy @JwLittooy]

@EndWokeness It’s not about rent control. It’s about the eventual seizure of private property.

[JW Littooy @JwLittooy]

@carldemaio With over 75 a 80% support, I don’t see this won’t pass…!!

[Saggezza Eterna @FinalTelegraph]

Communism is not a political philosophy; it is a profound declaration of war against human nature, excellence, and spiritual truth.

The democratic process has become an engine for a terrifying pathological movement. When you look at the modern left, you are not looking at a legitimate political alternative; you are looking at a calculated assault on reality itself. They do not win at the ballot box through superior ideas or economic viability. Instead, they weaponize the darkest corners of human nature. The modern voter does not choose the left because they genuinely believe in a utopian paradise; they vote for them out of a deep, bitter hatred for beauty, excellence, and natural hierarchy. It is the resentment of the baseline mediocre looking at the exceptional and wishing to drag it down into the mud. The left understands this psychological vulnerability perfectly. They have realized that the easiest way to conquer a civilization is not through external warfare, but by validating the envy of the masses. They promise an artificial equality that can only be achieved by severing the tallest heads in the room.

To understand the terrifying mechanism of this ideology, one must analyze its deceptive moral architecture. The left cloaks itself in the language of compassion, empathy, and social justice, but this is a calculated obfuscation designed to secure raw political power. They have absolutely no intention of helping the marginalized, the poor, or the working class. To them, human suffering is merely a resource to be mined, an excuse to expand the borders of the state and diminish individual autonomy. They preach a false gospel of virtue while practicing pure, unadulterated Machtpolitik (political action by a person or group which makes use of or is intended to increase their power or influence; power politics). Once they secure control, the masks slip instantly. The compassionate advocate transforms overnight into the ruthless apparatchik, demanding total obedience to the new regime. This is the oldest trick in the political playbook, a strategy that Machiavelli exposed centuries ago: project the illusion of mercy and religious devotion while quietly preparing the tools of absolute subjugation.

The historical record of communism is not a series of noble mistakes; it is an unbroken timeline of deliberate, systemic horror. Wherever this ideological virus has infected a nation, it has followed the exact same trajectory: it lies, it cheats, it steals, and ultimately, it kills. From the frozen, brutal landscape of the Soviet gulag system to the forced starvation of the Holodomor, communism proved itself to be a meat-grinder for human souls. In Maoist China, the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution systematically dismantled thousands of years of profound culture, replacing family loyalty with state worship and resulting in the slaughter of tens of millions of innocent lives. In Cambodia, the Khmer Rouge turned entire cities into literal killing fields, execution chambers where citizens were murdered merely for wearing glasses or speaking a foreign language, a supreme crime against the state’s mandatory ignorance. This is the true face of communism: a ravenous beast that consumes its own children in a futile attempt to force reality to conform to a broken, academic theory.

"Communism is not a political philosophy; it is a profound declaration of war against human nature, excellence, and spiritual truth."

The modern apologists who sit in coddled Western universities, sipping expensive coffee while defending the virtues of Marx, deserve nothing but absolute ridicule and contempt. They are the useful idiots of our generation, individuals so profoundly disconnected from reality that they believe they would be the intellectual elite directing the utopia, rather than the first casualties lined up against the wall. They claim that true communism has never been tried, a defense so dripping with arrogance and historical illiteracy that it borders on the psychopathic. How many more millions must die before these ideological cultists admit that their system is fundamentally broken? Every single time this experiment has been run, it has resulted in economic devastation, cultural erasure, and mass graves. To support this ideology in the modern era is to display either a total absence of intellect or a terrifying desire for human suffering.

We are entering a period of existential political warfare, and we cannot afford to show an ounce of intellectual mercy to those who wish to destroy our civilization. The time for polite debate, bipartisan compromise, and gentle disagreement is entirely over. The left’s ultimate goal is the complete financial and social expropriation of everything you have built, wrapped in the guise of democratic equity. They want a society dominated by a vast, unyielding technocracy where individual merit is treated as a social crime and dependency on the state is mandatory. If we allow even a trace of this ideological poison to remain within our institutions, our schools, or our halls of governance, it will inevitably fester and destroy the nation from the inside out.

We must draw an absolute line in the sand. We will never accept the creeping tyranny of statism, we will never bow to the forced consensus of the mob, and we will never apologize for defending beauty, strength, and truth. Our objective cannot merely be to manage the decline or contain the spread of leftist ideology; our objective must be the total and complete intellectual destruction of any trace of communism within our borders. We must aggressively expose their chicanery, humiliate their pseudo-intellectual leaders, and reclaim the cultural ground that was surrendered through decades of conservative cowardice. The future of our civilization depends on our willingness to look at this terrifying threat, call it by its true name, and utterly eradicate its influence from our society once and for all.

We can and will get through this,
Blessings,
Saggezza Eterna

[JW Littooy @JwLittooy]

@DuaZarraA 191

[JW Littooy @JwLittooy]

@linadreaamy 205

[Ethan Brooks @alt_w_v_g]

A deal came across my desk this week

Largest revenue-collecting enterprise in America:
> 71M customers
> 185M people funding it
> Mandatory participation
> No competitors
> No churn

On paper it's the best business model I've ever seen, so I ran diligence

It's Social Security

Put my analyst on the financials:
> He came back in 4 hours
> He did not look well

Started with the revenue model:
> 12.4% of every dollar you earn
> 6.2% withheld from your paycheck
> 6.2% paid by your employer, which is your money taking a longer route
> Applied to the first $184,500 of income, then it stops

That's the collection engine

Then I traced where the money goes

First finding:
> Nothing was set aside
> The money comes in from workers and goes out to retirees the same month
> The surplus got spent the moment it arrived
> The "trust fund" everyone talks about is $2.56T of the government holding IOUs from itself
> It has paid out more than it took in every year since 2021
> Last year the shortfall hit $160B
> I asked him where the actual money was
> He said "it already left, sir"

Second finding:
> The model only works if the people paying in can cover the people cashing out
> In 1960 there were more than 5 workers for every person collecting a check
> Today there are fewer than 3
> In 20 years there will be fewer than 2.5
> And 4.1M Americans are turning 65 every year right now
> The largest wave of retirements in the country's history
> My son was at the table
> He looked at the chart
> He said "so fewer and fewer people are paying for more and more people, and at some point it stops working?"
> I said "that's the structure, yes"
> He went back to his cereal
> My analyst looked up from his laptop
> He said "sir, with respect, this looks like a pyramid scheme"
> I corrected him
> A pyramid scheme is illegal
> This one is mandatory

Third finding:
> The headline says the money runs out in 2034
> Then my analyst found the footnote
> It is not one fund
> The old-age and survivors fund and a separate disability fund, kept apart by law
> The 2034 number blends them
> Un-blend them and the retirement side, the one almost everyone is counting on, goes first
> Not someday. Not a generation from now
> The fourth quarter of 2032
> After that the math only allows it to pay 78 cents on every dollar it promised
> A 22% cut. Automatic. No vote required.

What it would take to close the gap:
> Raise the 12.4% payroll tax to roughly 16.8%
> Cut every benefit by more than 20%, immediately and permanently
> Or some combination of the two

A remediation plan that's actually passed: none.

Pulled the cap table:
> The first person ever to collect a monthly check was a woman named Ida May Fuller
> She paid in $24.75
> Her employer paid another $24.75, which was also her money
> She collected $22,888.92
> More than 460 times what went in

The model front-loaded its winners

My wife read it over my shoulder

She did not argue with any of it

She never does

She just looked at me, then looked at the ceiling, and said nothing

She thinks I take things too far

She also thinks I'm right

Here's my diligence conclusion:
> Took your money for 40 years
> Spent it the month it arrived
> Set nothing aside
> Built a model that runs on demographics it no longer has
> Left a 22% cut to trigger in 2032
> Has no fix that ever passed

In any other deal we'd have a word for this

In this one we call it your retirement

I'm not saying anything

The economic model is saying it

Make common sense common again

Plz fix. Thx.

Sent from my iPhone

[Joseph Hernandez @hernandezforny]

There is a reason history matters.

Lenin didn’t take over Russia overnight. He first took over his party.

He energized young activists. He attacked moderates in his own movement as sellouts. He demanded ideological purity. He promised free everything, demonized business, divided society into oppressors and oppressed, and insisted the existing system was beyond reform, it had to be fundamentally transformed.

Sound familiar?

Today, @ZohranKMamdani and the @DemSocialists aren’t trying to win over the Democratic Party, they’re trying to replace it. Primary by primary, incumbent by incumbent, they’re pulling the party further toward government control, wealth redistribution, and anti-capitalist policies.

History doesn’t repeat itself exactly, but it often rhymes.

Every New Yorker who believes in free enterprise, public safety, fiscal responsibility, and the American Dream should be paying attention.

Political movements don’t transform institutions overnight. They do it one election at a time.

[300 Guns @300_guns]

@GavinNewsom

[Flopping Aces @FloppingAces]

The New York Times accidentally told the truth when it cried that the Supreme Court is “unshackling the presidency.”

Unshackling.

Interesting word.

Because that means they know the presidency was shackled.

The question is: by whom?

Not the voters.

Not Congress.

Not the Constitution.

No, the “shackles” were the entire unelected anti-Trump containment system: activist judges, permanent bureaucrats, NGO lawyers, blue-state attorneys general, media stenographers, and the rest of the courthouse Resistance industry that decided executive power was legitimate only when Democrats controlled it.

When Obama stretched authority, it was “historic leadership.”

When Biden ignored borders, loans, mandates, and emergency limits, it was “saving democracy.”

But when Trump enforces immigration law, ends “temporary” status that somehow lasted longer than most Hollywood marriages, and tells DHS to do its actual job?

Suddenly the presidency is too powerful.

Suddenly courts must intervene.

Suddenly the Founders apparently intended America to be governed by district judges in Boston, nonprofit asylum mills, and New York Times guest essayists hyperventilating into their oat milk.

That is why they are panicking.

SCOTUS is not creating a dictatorship.

It is exposing the dictatorship of the veto class.

The people who spent years using lawfare to restrain one elected president are now horrified that the Supreme Court may be cutting through their fake restraints.

The “shackles” were never constitutional guardrails.

They were political handcuffs.

And the left loved them because they only snapped shut in one direction.

Now the chains are breaking.

And the same media that cheered every injunction is suddenly terrified that Trump may have turned their lawfare machine into his legal armor.
(article below)

[JW Littooy @JwLittooy]

@Holden_Ford1976 @MarioNawfal Exactly. Thats the evil plan to confiscate personal property-it’s the communist playbook

[🦅 Eagle Wings 🦅 @CRRJA5]

🚨 Leftists always scream “America has sky-high murder rates because of guns!”
Watch this.
The guy claims the US is near the top globally. Then the facts hit: Remove just five cities — Chicago, Detroit, Washington D.C., St. Louis, and Philadelphia — and America drops to 189th out of 193 countries in murder rate.
What do ALL five of those bloodbath cities have in common for decades?
Democrat mayors. Democrat city councils. Democrat soft-on-crime policies.
Failed progressive experiments, defund movements, gun control that disarms the good guys, and revolving-door “justice.”
This isn’t a “gun problem.” It’s a Democrat urban failure problem.
The Second Amendment isn’t the issue — criminals and the politicians protecting them are.
Video nails it. Share the truth.

[JW Littooy @JwLittooy]

@end3of6days9 @HistorianUSA1 738

[Jeffery Mead @the_jefferymead]

@Awakenjp Wrong. Black people can be racist. Racism does not require a power structure.

Saying black people can’t be racist is nonsense.