We are allowed to set some boundaries about what we do and do not consider acceptable or productive dialogue, particularly when we are trying to rectify some long-standing inequities in archaeology.
@BarbVossArchaeo Absolutely! An organization's prerogative to draw boundaries around what it considers acceptable is not the same as the government's responsibility to free speech. We have no obligation to cater to "both sidesism".
@Chaco_arch@dwmixter Michelle, Crow Canyon can probably connect you with this. Tim and I both have Adobe Suite licenses, and we will probably drop one of them once we are all back in the field.
@Tine_Rass That makes me envious because I generally get to play "Indiana Jones and the poorly preserved ephemeral hearth, bisected by a rodent and unnoticed by a student till halfway gone."
1/ CW: harassment, thread
--
๐ข๐ขThis morning, my articles about #harassment in #archaeology were released by @CambUP_Archaeo and @SAAorg. Both articles are published full Open Access so that they are available to all #archaeologists. Please share! https://t.co/0S9bXl8Zgc