Dude, the martyrdom notices come from Hamas and Islamic Jihad’s own Telegram channels. You take their word for everything else. Other people got fooled. You’re just part of the same Islamist propaganda machine.
Since my abduction, I’ve spoken to CNN, BBC, ABC, CBS, FOX, Sky News and Sunrise because I want the world to know what we went through. Every team showed empathy and professionalism, except @piersmorgan’s researcher, whose approach felt rude, victim blaming and gaslighting.
BREAKING: Two Iranian nationals charged with preparing terrorist acts against the Jewish community in Manchester.
https://t.co/xxNNKCrOXl
📺 Sky 501, Virgin 602, Freeview 233 and YouTube
The same @EmmanuelMacron who posts 10 times a day against Israel, is completely silent when his own country is burning.
Not a single post about the riots. This is his only post today 👇
שואל את עצמי, איזה משמעות יש להמשך המשפט שלי.
הרי פסק הדין כבר נכתב.
אם רק היו קוראים לי שחאדה או טיבי או מנסור …
אני שהזהרתי מפורשות מפני הטבח האסלאמי הרצחני, נפסלתי ואני עומד לדין.
שחאדה ששיבח והסית לחיסולה של ישראל במודל ה7.10 מלוטף בכפפות רכות ומלטפות.
אסור לשתוק, לעיוות המטורף הזה, של כנופיית בריוני מערכת אכיפת החוק הסלקטיבית.
Piers's claim that the IDF keeps foreign journalists out of Gaza because it has "something to hide" is lazy nonsense that falls apart with even basic reporting.
Every serious military restricts independent media movement in an active war zone. You can't have journalists freely roaming around filming troop positions, routes and tactics in real time. They can also become targets, get taken hostage, or create situations where soldiers have to change or stop operations to protect them.
Israel's High Court accepted these security arguments in 2024, and the state has made the same case repeatedly since: uncontrolled entry can put both soldiers and journalists at risk. Controlled embeds exist. Free roaming does not. That isn't some uniquely Israeli cover-up. It's how wars work.
A journalist doing the bare minimum would've looked at the court filings, examined the actual operational-security argument, and addressed the evidence around Hamas members operating under media cover before jumping straight to "they must be hiding something".
Instead, Piers basically ignored the argument and then immediately pivoted back to the journalist ban when the IDF presented evidence about militants posing as press. That isn't skepticism - it's refusing to engage with the actual claim in front of you.
Piers is simply not a serious or honest journalist.