KJOAKLEY

[Token Gremlin @TokenGremlin]

Created with Fable 5.2 by an Anthropic engineer.

THIS IS AAA-LEVEL STUFF!!!!!!!

[Willow🍀 @Willow310111]

Me when overthinking

[KJOAKLEY @KANJUNIN]

วันนี้ คนของ OPENAI เงียบแปลกๆนะ สงสัยเตรียมปล่อยของกันแน่ๆเลย

[Leon Lin @LexnLin]

this might be the best thing i've built with opus 5.5

every frame is python, no 3D assets were used

[Pankaj Kumar @pankajkumar_dev]

GPT-6.2 Sol : My Impressions/Review

- Yesterday, it got routed to Sol 6.1, and I got access too. I've tested around 8-10 projects with it.
- I find this model quite impressive. Its very good at 3D, and it can generate videos through code that don't even look like they were created with code. They look like actual AI generated videos.
- I created a black hole that looks like a scene from the movie Interstellar. One of the best outputs I have created.
- I can easily say its comparable to Astra and Opus 5.5, although Opus still has the edge.
- Speed is also quite good. One of the worst things about sol was speed, but this is much better now.
- It has that same GPT taste, which can still improve, and speed can be even better, like Google's models.
- It looks more efficient and faster, but its not at Opus 5.5's level just yet. It can get there soon. They are still doing grey testing, and the feedback seems more positive overall.

I will do more testing, especially on the coding side, as the code I have seen doesn't look very human-friendly.

[Pankaj Kumar @pankajkumar_dev]

Another crazy output from GPT-6.2 Sol!

This time, I asked it to build a 3D black hole simulation with gravitational lensing and a glowing accretion disk.

This gives Interstellar movie vibes, btw. And no external 3D assets, no pre rendered video. Just code.

Look at the colors, plasma details, and lighting. The visual quality is seriously impressive.

[Anika 🎀❤️ @AnikaCodes]

A model named Sol made a sun and then blew it up 💀

Apparently GPT-6.2 Sol, just pure code. That nebula render at the end is actually terrifying

[camper 🦎🎣 @camperaigg]

🚨 Fable 5.5 TESTING Part 17

🕳️ I asked Claude to drop me into a black hole in three.js.

I never touched the code. 🤯

⏱️ 122 minutes
💸 $13.02 in API costs
🤖 Claude Fable 5.5 Xhigh in Claude Code

Sound on. 🔊 What it did on its own 👇

🔦 Traced about 30 billion light rays backward through curved spacetime, up to 760 steps each
🪐 No thrusters: one real free-fall orbit that whirls at twice the horizon radius, then plunges through it to the singularity
🌌 Bent and Doppler-shifted a real 8K map of the Milky Way, per pixel
🔥 Didn't paint the disk: each point's temperature, shifted by its speed and gravity, goes through a blackbody lookup
🎻 Wrote the orchestral score note by note on a library of 710 CC0 samples, after pitch-tracking them and finding the note names sit an octave off
🥁 The strings accelerate with the fall, from 3.8 to 20 notes a second, and three huge hits land as the orbit crosses the disk's plane
🔇 Everything stops dead at the event horizon. Then an endless rising tone climbs until the cut
🕵️ Spotted a brightness jump at 27 s and traced it to its own clock stair-stepping near the singularity
🖥️ My PC started lagging mid-render. It measured the GPU at 100%, split each frame into 512 small jobs with pauses, and resumed

📦 30 s · 1080p · 1,800 frames rendered · 8 sub-frames each · custom GLSL ray tracer

[Marcel @marcthecreatorr]

GPT 6.2 Sol vs Opus 5.5 [3D Sailing Ship Test]

same prompt: create an interactive sailing ship in three.js, make it detailed as possible:

- GPT 6.2 Sol: ~27 minutes and cost $3
- Opus 5.5: max reasoning ~1hr 35 mins and cost $16

Sol did a better job recreating the ship itself, especially the shape, sails and lighting but Opus has a more detailed background overall.

be honest, which one would you pick here?

[Sahil Panhotra | Indie Builder @SahilPanhotra]

GPT 6.2 Sol is INSANE.

btw, if you didn't know, some users are reportedly getting routed to GPT 6.2 Sol when using GPT 6.1 Sol.

I ran my usual peacock BMX test on it, and the feather details and overall scene look ridiculously good.

more tests coming soon.

[Salio @Mr_Salio]

🚨 GPT-6.2 Sol Second OUTPUT

This is actually insane good

Look at the ocean waves realistic reflections moving clouds lighting and the transition from night to sunset and The Sound

The entire environment feels alive

I'm genuinely impressed

[Salio @Mr_Salio]

GPT-6.2 Sol painted Sam Altman in 18 seconds

[Ananth @Ananth7e]

GPT-6.2 Sol paints sam altman

[Token Gremlin @TokenGremlin]

I never thought I'd live to see GPT-6.2 Sol being SO MUCH BETTER than GPT-6 Astra while being significantly cheaper. This is absolutely incredible. OpenAI is back.

This entire village was built with Three.js, packed into a single HTML file. No Blender, no external 3D assets. Just code.

The cherry blossoms, the river, the whole scene shifting from daylight to glowing windows at night. Look at this.

[acervo gatinhos @acervogatinhos]

queria sair no soco com alguém

[KJOAKLEY @KANJUNIN]

@TokenGremlin ของฉัน 6.1 SOL max

[KJOAKLEY @KANJUNIN]

@TokenGremlin ฉันคิดว่ามันพอๆกับ ASTRA MAX

[Token Gremlin @TokenGremlin]

GPT-6.2 Sol is already showing up for some ChatGPT users, and just look at what it's creating.

These aren't screenshots from a game. They're Three.js scenes generated from a single prompt, with everything packed into ONE HTML file.

I've been waiting to see what Sol could do. And now I think we're finally going to see a worthy competitor to Opus 5.5 for Plus users.

[Vaibhav (VB) Srivastav @reach_vb]

To be fair: Images 2.6 landed on Plus four days ago! You can turn a sketch into a GIF, and images generate 50% faster.

We also tripled daily GPT‑Live voice time from 1 to 3 hours.

On Codex, even tho Plus limits stayed the same, 6.1 Terra gets you more tasks out of that allowance.

(all in the last 4 weeks)

[KJOAKLEY @KANJUNIN]

@thsottiaux เมื่อก่อน PRO100 ได้ 5X เอง PRO50 ได้ 5X ฉันคิดว่าไม่ค่อยสมเหตุสมผลเท่าไหร่ ถ้าจะเป็นแบบนั้นให้คนสามารถเติม 10 USD แล้วได้ 1X กลับมาเลยไม่ดีกว่ารึ เพราะมันจะไม่ต่างกันเลย ที่ต่างก็มีแค่ปริมาณ TOKEN