How do I know the media is brainwashing people?
Obama's ICE Chief received the Presidential Award for Distinguished Service for removing over 900,000 illegal aliens.
Trump's ICE Chief is called a Nazi.
It is the same person.....Tom Homan....
The only difference? The narrative.
These two paragraphs of my verdict are crucial for everyone to read and understand.
"Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.” 1⃣
"For Van Langenhove to have committed a crime, it is not necessary for him to have incited concrete acts of hate or violence. It suffices that others are incited to take on a general attitude of intolerance or disapproval regarding a group protected under the criteria of the Anti-Racism Law." 2⃣
This means you can go to jail for "inciting hatred" even if your statements were 100% factual (see 1⃣) and even if you did NOT incite concrete acts of hate (see 2���).
The benchmark of "inciting hatred" , a crime punishable by prison, is thus "saying something that has the potential of inciting someone to have a general attitude of disapproval regarding a protected group". This means literally any criticism of mass migration is now a punishable offence. If you cite a statistic, and someone could potentially think less of a protected group (like migrants) because of it, you can be jailed.
The craziest part is that there is no defence possible against this. I brought the scientific studies that I cited to court, but the judge didn't care 1⃣. I also proved that the hundreds of students present at the lecture included students of all different political affiliations, and everyone was able to voice their opinion or ask questions. The lecture went very calmly, so obviously nobody was incited to hatred. But this too did not matter 2⃣, because if the judge says he believes there is the possibility that someone COULD be incited to "a general attitude of disapproval", this is enough for the judge to send me to jail, even without any evidence.
I'm telling you this to warn you that by the time these hate speech laws have come into place, it's already too late. You will NEVER be able to beat these laws in court. You have to stop them before they are implemented. Let my fate be your warning.
Everyone’s told plastic pollution is a “global” problem…
But the data say something very different.
Roughly 90–95% of ocean plastic comes from a handful of rivers... mostly in Asia and Africa. The Yangtze. Ganges. Mekong. Nile. Niger.
Not your grocery bag in Colorado.
Not your straw in D.C.
A small number of poorly managed waste systems are doing the overwhelming majority of the damage.
The UN isn’t structuring this like a solvable engineering problem... it’s structuring it like a permanent global revenue stream.
Because if you solve it quickly and directly…
there’s no need for decades of committees, funding mechanisms, and “frameworks.”
When South African soldiers died in the DRC,the whole continent of Africa laughed and Rwanda celebrated,that's the Pan Africanism they are talking about💔
In 2026, Julius Malema explained to a crowd of EFF supporters that the songs they sing are not just songs, they are in fact "war cries" and that he uses songs to educate people about what the revolution means.
And remember, what does Malema say the revolution demands? Killing.
If "Kill the Boer" has nothing to do with farm murders, then why is it chanted at farm murder court cases?
In 2020, the body of 21-year-old Brendin Horner was discovered on a farm near Senekal, tied to a pole, with a rope around his neck, and a bloodstained knife at his feet.
At the court case where the farm murder suspects appeared, the EFF showed up and chanted "Kill the Boer, kill the farmer" outside the courthouse, close enough for Horner's grieving parents to hear clearly.
Reminder that the CIA wrote a report in the early 1970s emphasizing that Ian Smith was governing Rhodesia well, was not corrupt, was advancing in prosperity, and--most importantly--that it was fighting communist rebels
The report nevertheless demanded Rhodesia be destroyed because of the Smith government's decision to not be racially egalitarian, and instead remain committed on Responsible Government that would advance national prosperity and fend off communism
On that basis, the CIA supported the communist-led destruction of Rhodesia, much as it had supported Ho Chi Minh against the French in the late 1940s
The CIA is rotten and should be destroyed
Basotho will soon be able to enter South Africa using only national ID cards, following an agreement between Home Affairs Minister Dr Leon Schreiber of the EF…I mean the DA @Our_DA and Lebona Lephema of Lesotho.
The new migration model includes a One Stop Border Post to enable faster, more seamless movement between the two countries.
The DA is actively opening borders as they believe in the No Border Policy. DA leaders are beneficiaries of Borderless Africa and one European Passport holders, which gives them access everywhere.
Once again, Europe's history shows that if you simply hang the tiny percentage of the population that commits essentially all of the crime, rather than giving it EBT Danegeld indefinitely, the criminality problem goes away
Europe hanged 1% of each generation for centuries. Practically every crime beyond the most petty minor offenses were capital crimes, and the proper sentencing was rigorously enforced
Horse thieves, robbers, murderers, etc. faced not "probation" given them by a pro-crime judge, but the gallows. And they faced it for centuries, from roughly the High Middle Ages to the Georgian period
The result was that crime went away. They plucked the crime genes out of the population by ruthlessly punishing criminals, and the result was that their civilization could focus on doing great and noble things instead of endlessly subsidizing a criminal underclass
It is this lesson that must be in mind as we deal with crime and criminality. The number of lawbreakers is relatively small, though much dead wood has been allowed to build up. It's time to start handling that with the seriousness it deserves
Here’s Ben Stein in 1979 describing television as an engine of cultural demoralization. He argues that a small clique of producers and writers pushed a left-coded inversion of reality onto the public. They despised traditional power centers and hated figures like Buckley. They propagandized the nation into accepting a fake world where businessmen are villains, criminals are the good-guys, small towns are sinister, military officers are proto-fascists, and work barely exists.
Brits surrendered their firearms in 1997.
Less than 30 years later, they're being arrested for Facebook posts.
That's not "safety." That's the speed of tyranny once a government knows its citizens can't push back.
When people are disarmed, the state no longer fears the people. And when governments have zero fear of the people, they do whatever the hell they want.
History proves it over and over: an unarmed population is a compliant one. The right to bear arms isn't just about hunting or sport, it's the final check against a government that forgets it's supposed to serve, not rule.
The Second Amendment isn't about muskets. It's about maintaining the balance of power between citizens and the state.
Never give up the means to defend your liberty. Because once it's gone, the slide into authoritarianism happens faster than most people expect.
May this never happen here.