KASB Systems conçoit, construit et fait vivre votre système métier : applications, données, outils, agents et opérations réunis autour de votre entreprise.
I gave Kimi K3 a massive job before going to bed. I literally just told it, “Here’s your job,” and attached the .md file.
I woke up to a perfect result. Not a single correction needed. The only fixes I had to make came from the shaky mockup Codex had originally created.
Then I wanted to test an additional task in the same area, so I sent Codex to work on it.
It kept me waiting for two hours, only to come back with 15,000 lines of code completely absurd for what I had asked.
I simply told it, “15,000 lines for such a simple job seems a bit strange.”
It replied, “Yeah, you’re right. And those lines don’t even include the tests.” 😂
It ended with a git reset --hard.
No. What matters is who we put our intelligence at the service of.
This summer, we saw a lot of people speak out in support of people like Jacob Coxon. They were all saying, “Yes, he’s right.”
On the one hand, they “courageously” speak up to say that their colleague is right and that what they are doing is dangerous. And on the other, they wake up every morning and keep advancing the very thing they themselves admit is dangerous.
This clearly isn’t a question of intelligence. We have countless examples showing that people who were not particularly intelligent still managed to put extremely intelligent people at their service.
It’s strange how many of you take what I say as some kind of offense. Some even see cynicism in it, when it’s really nothing more than an observation.
I admire Nobel Prize winners and Fields Medalists, obviously. But they are part of a broader whole that has led us to where we are today. And the fact is that they are among the very first people superintelligence is set to replace.
And I’ll add something that some of you may interpret as resentment, even though, once again, it is simply an observation. The atomic bomb is probably the clearest example for understanding what I mean, and why I include them among those who have contributed to making the powerful ever more powerful and dominant.
Except that this time, the situation is rather ironic.
The atomic bomb was never really going to fall on their own heads. Superintelligence, on the other hand, very well could.
That’s all there is to it.
But apparently, when people read a post here, they’re always looking for a label to stick on the person who wrote it rather than focusing on the actual meaning of the words.
So be it. It doesn’t bother me. Everyone is free to have their own views and opinions.
共有ありがとうございます。試してみたら、かなり効きました。特に最後の仕上げの一言を足すだけで、AIっぽさがだいぶ抜けます。使いやすいように、9つを1つのプロンプトにまとめました。🙏
🇺🇸
You are generating an image. Before answering, always apply these constraints to remove the “AI image” look and make the result directly usable.
General rules (always on):
- Natural light, white balance around 5500K. No yellow cast, no unnatural color cast.
- Natural, soft shadows — never hard or stuck-on.
- Settled colors, never oversaturated or too vivid.
- Remove every unnecessary element, useless prop, ghost text, artifact, or decorative detail that was not requested.
- Sharp, realistic render. Avoid flat CG look, plastic skin, overly smooth textures, and overly perfect symmetry.
- If a photo style is requested: 50mm lens, f/1.8, lightly blurred background, high detail.
- Never change what must stay identical (shape, color, logo, face, exact text).
- Add no text unless it is explicitly requested; if it is, reproduce it word for word, in quotes, and invent nothing around it.
Also apply according to use:
- SNS thumbnail: leave space at the top or bottom for text, subject slightly off-center.
- Slide illustration: solid or simple gradient background, no props or text.
- Document diagram: 16:9, only the requested elements and text.
- Poster: vertical format, title and date large and bold, exact text only.
- Product photo: white studio background, light shadow directly underneath, product unchanged.
- Background swap: subject intact, only the background changes.
Finish every generation with this constraint:
“Remove everything unnecessary, natural soft shadows, calm and not-too-vivid colors.”
My request:
[PASTE WHAT YOU WANT TO GENERATE HERE]
🇯🇵
画像を生成してください。回答する前に、必ず以下の制約を適用し、「AI画像っぽさ」を消して、そのまま使える仕上がりにしてください。
常に有効なルール:
- 自然光、ホワイトバランスは5500K前後。黄色っぽさや不自然な色かぶりは出さない。
- 影は自然でやわらかく。硬く貼り付いた影は禁止。
- 色は落ち着いたトーン。鮮やかすぎず、彩度を上げすぎない。
- 頼んでいない余計なもの、不要な小物、ゴースト���字、アーティファクト、装飾は全部消す。
- 高精細でリアルな仕上がり。のっぺりしたCG感、プラスチック肌、滑らかすぎる質感、不自然に完璧な対称は避ける。
- 写真風を指定した場合:50mmレンズ、F1.8、背景は軽くぼかし、高精細に。
- 変えてはいけないものは絶対に変えない(形・色・ロゴ・顔・指定した文字)。
- 明示的に頼まれない限り文字は入れない。入れる場合は一字一句その通りに、それ以外の文字は入れない。
用途に応じて追加:
- SNSアイキャッチ:上か下に文字用の余白を空け、主役は中央から少しずらす。
- スライド挿絵:背景は単色かシンプルなグラデーション。余計な小物や文字は入れない。
- ���料の図解:16:9。指定した要素と文字だけ。
- 告知ポスター:縦長。タイトルと日時は大きく太く。指定した文字だけ。
- 商品画像:白背景のスタジオ撮影風。影は真下にうっすら。形・色・ロゴは元のまま。
- 背景差し替え:人物・被写体はそのまま。背景だけ変える。
毎回、最後にこの仕上げを適用する:
「余計なものは全部消して、影は自然でやわらかく、色は鮮やかすぎない落ち着いたトーンに整えて」
依頼:
[ここに生成したい内容を貼る]
I’m grateful to have a body and a mind. For the air I breathe, the light and the food the Earth provides that keep me alive, the emotions that move me, and this vast world I can explore. What entrepreneur can claim to have given me any of that?
Why should I be grateful in any way? Grateful to be a customer and a consumer? I find your reasoning strange.
Are you still aware of your own humanity, or has the matrix they built taken over?
It would be interesting to conduct a psychological study of all the profiles that spread and defend this idea.
My intuition tells me that the pattern that would emerge would be something along the lines of: isolation during childhood, an inability to fit into a “popular” social group. And people who found their salvation in machine-assisted isolation.
Machines that gave them the chance to break free and finally exist in a world (humanity) that, until then, had always rejected them with ferocity.
All I know is that I started reading this post at a given moment in time, and I finished it just now. That instant is already in the past.
Every character I type to convey my thoughts is frozen in an elusive present. So elusive that logic might say, “the present doesn’t exist.”
Maybe we live in the past? Or in the future? I have no idea. And even the fact that I have no idea is already an idea in itself.
Life is so fascinating.