Kelly O.

[Kelly O. @KellyOchie]

@mkhammer 🤣🤣🤣

[Mary Katharine Ham @mkhammer]

“You see things; and you say ‘Why?’ But I dream things that never were, and I say 'Why not?’”

[Joe Rogan Podcast News @joeroganhq]

RFK Jr: "We've recently uncovered that more than 36,000 doctors had their Medicare reimbursements altered based upon childhood vaccination rates. That's not medicine. That's coercion."

[Masih Alinejad @AlinejadMasih]

Ten more Iranian protesters scheduled to be executed tomorrow. Two protesters were hanged in Iran today.

You all watching war headlines but no one talks about the war being imposed on us Iranians by our own regime that hanging its own people in silence.

They are people who said: we want freedom.

If no one speaks, they kill more people.

Share this. Scream.

#StopExecutionsInIran

[End Wokeness @EndWokeness]

Sunny Hostin: "No one is above the law"

Sunny Hostin now: "How dare you arrest my son? My name is Sunny Hostin!"

[Masih Alinejad @AlinejadMasih]

While the world watches the war, the Islamic Republic of Iran hanged a 19-year-old boy today.

His name is Erfan Esfandiari and he was his parents' only child.

He did not kill anyone. He did not carry a weapon. His crime, according to the Islamic Republic, was opening a door. Sheltering protesters who were running from security forces. That was enough to send him to the gallows.

Erfan was one of 12 young men in the Alikhani Square case in Isfahan, arrested during the January 2026 uprising. Yesterday, all 12 were moved to quarantine. Today, the Islamic Republic hanged him.

This is a government that is so terrified of a generation that refuses to be silent, that it executes teenagers for the act of compassion.

Say his name. Because the regime is already trying to erase him. Because his mother and father are left with nothing, not even the right to grieve loudly.

[The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox]

RFK Jr. reveals what HHS found when they went looking for the 375,000 migrant kids Biden lost.

"It's a huge, huge tragedy."

"One guy pretended to be the parent of 42 children. We have no idea what happened to those kids."

"We're now finding them. We found about 137,000 of them, but a lot of them you just can't find. There was about 60 kids who were sent to one address. When we looked at that address, it was a container, a steel container in the middle of a parking lot."

"A lot of them were sent to work at slaughterhouses and picking fruits in the fields. They were slaves."

"So we stopped that. Now everybody who comes in has to validate the relationship. We DNA test them to make sure they're related to that kid. Nobody gets a kid unless we know that is the kid's parent or relative."

"It's a huge, huge tragedy. My agency [under Biden] was the single biggest child trafficker in the world."

[The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox]

RFK Jr. says HHS loses $100,000,000,000 a year to theft.

He found some thieves would bribe poor people with flat screen TVs to get their patient numbers and enroll them in hospice.

Then they would proceed to bill Medicaid "$6,000 a month FOREVER."

RFK JR: "We shut down 800 hospices. You know what a hospice is? Where you're going to die. Typically, if you go to a hospice, you leave within 18 days because your dying is terminal."

"We started looking at these hospices in Los Angeles, and the people never died. Two or three years later they were there, and we're paying $6,000 a month."

"We found a hotel room with 29 hospices in it. I mean a hotel, every room was a hospice, and none of them had any patients. They were just addresses."

"The guys who own them, they were Estonians and Armenians and people from Eastern Europe who were getting the patient numbers. They were stealing them from doctors' offices."

"They were also going into poor neighborhoods in Los Angeles and they'd say to the people, 'We'll give you this $375 flat-screen TV. You give us your patient number and we're going to enroll you in this hospice. You don't ever have to go. We're just going to enroll you,' and then we'll charge Medicaid $6,000 a month forever. And the guy never dies, of course, because he was never sick."

"We didn't get a single call from a congressman or from a business owner saying, 'Oh, you shut down my hospice and all these patients are on the street.' None of them, because they were all crooked and they knew they were crooked."

[AnUnimportantPerson @TheUn_important]

@elonmusk https://t.co/BIKdaKyNuX

[AnUnimportantPerson @TheUn_important]

The Problem with Broad Definitions of Hate Speech

The United Nations recently posted about hate speech, which prompted me to look more closely at the definition provided in one of the linked resources. After reading it, I was left with concerns that the definition may be overly broad, highly subjective, and open to a wide range of interpretations.
https://t.co/6oIJ0ARZuV

The first issue is the concept of an "attack." What exactly constitutes an attack? Does criticism of a religion count as an attack? Does criticism of a government's immigration policy count as an attack on a nationality or ethnic group? Different people may interpret the word "attack" in very different ways, making it difficult to apply consistently.

The second issue concerns the phrase "pejorative or discriminatory language." While some words are clearly intended as insults, many others depend heavily on context. A statement that one person considers offensive may be viewed by another as legitimate criticism, satire, or political commentary. The definition appears to leave considerable room for subjective interpretation.

Another concern is the inclusion of "behaviour." This term is extremely broad. Does it include jokes, social exclusion, peaceful protest, artistic expression, or academic debate? The definition does not clearly specify what forms of behaviour are covered, creating uncertainty about its scope.

The phrase "based on who they are" also raises questions. If someone criticises an idea, religion, ideology, or cultural practice, are they criticising the belief itself or the people who hold that belief? Throughout history, societies have often debated where this line should be drawn. Yet the definition provides little guidance on how to distinguish criticism of ideas from hostility toward individuals.

There is also the issue of the phrase "other identity factor." This appears to be an open-ended category that could potentially encompass a vast range of characteristics. From a legal perspective, such broad language may create uncertainty. Lawyers and lawmakers generally seek precise definitions because vague categories can make enforcement inconsistent and unpredictable.

Perhaps the most significant concern is the lack of distinction between intent and effect. The definition does not clearly separate speech intended to promote hatred from speech that merely causes offence. This distinction can be crucial in both law and public policy. Intent, context, and audience often play an important role in determining the meaning and impact of speech.

To illustrate the problem, consider the statement: "This hate speech law is stupid." Most people would view this as criticism of a law rather than an attack on a group of people. However, under a broad interpretation, someone might argue that:

The law was created to protect certain groups.
Criticism of the law undermines those protections.
Undermining those protections contributes to a hostile environment.
Therefore, criticism of the law indirectly targets the groups the law seeks to protect.

Whether one agrees with this reasoning or not, the possibility of such an interpretation highlights the challenges that can arise when definitions lack precision.

A similar issue emerges with statements such as, "This religion is stupid," "This ideology is stupid," or "This cultural practice is stupid." Some would argue that these statements are criticisms of beliefs, ideas, or practices. Others would argue that they are attacks on the people who identify with them. The definition itself does not clearly explain where the boundary lies.

If a definition is too broad or ambiguous, it risks creating confusion about what is prohibited and what remains protected as criticism, debate, satire, or dissent. In practice, this ambiguity may also have a chilling effect, where individuals become uncertain or even afraid to express legitimate opinions. In that sense, the question arises whether such broad framing functions to prevent harm, or whether it risks stifling free expression by discouraging people from speaking openly in the first place.
https://t.co/o9bLaDYxgC

Here are my thoughts learning from the past on the danger of unclear definitions.👇
https://t.co/SUqm8MOczh

What do you think?

#Freespeech #Hatespeech @UN

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

This is messed up

[Rebecca Mistereggen @RMistereggen]

How many of you have heard of Ilias Kasidiaris?

The former Greek MP and politician remains imprisoned in Greece, due to one of the most controversial cases in the EU.

He’s serving time from the Golden Dawn convictions, but a recent judicial decision has drawn heavy criticism: His June 2025 release request was denied 2-1, against the Prosecutor’s recommendation, partly because he maintains an active X account (@IliasKasidiaris), with help from supporters to comment on politics.

“The applicant… maintains a personal account on… X… expressing his views on current political and social affairs,” the court said.

They will therefore keep him imprisoned despite good conduct and significant time served.

This sets a dangerous precedent for political speech. How does it differ from cases Elon Musk has criticized in the UK?

[John Solomon @jsolomonReports]

Speaking of election losers…. The speech focused on fixing problems for 2026 that have been around since 2020. Democrats could have spared yourself the speech had Biden patched the machines and alerted states they had their data compromised. BTW, how did that whole Russia collusion thing work out?

[JD Vance @JDVance]

This is completely bogus. I never received a message like this.

If I had, I would have said: Jared and Steve are trusted members of the president's team and very dear friends. No one has done more than the two of them to work towards peace and prosperity in the region. The idea they're trading on insider information is absurd.

I see a lot of BS flying around and I normally just ignore it. But Steve and Jared are good dudes and I'm honored to work with them.

[Kelly O. @KellyOchie]

@LoggieNY_ @alex_fasulo Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative......with other lefty states in north east.

[Kelly O. @KellyOchie]

@LoggieNY_ @alex_fasulo You left out the REGGI (REGI not sure of the letters exactly) scam that started a long time ago. That shit doubled our bills in NY.....the electric companies had to start billing every month. Smdh....something about carbon caps....when it failed in congress.....

[Alex Fasulo @alex_fasulo]

"Kathy Hochul cares about the environment! She just put a moratorium on data centers."

Here's a quick political science 101 on what Ms. Hochul is up to by pandering to the emotions around data center build-outs nationwide right now.

Firstly, New York State doesn't have the power to support data centers. Why? Starting in 2019, to justify the Climate Act, we took over 2,000MW of reliable (nuclear) energy offline to create a "climate crisis" that they claimed we needed wind and solar to "fix."

It's why this same woman has asked you to set your thermostat to 78 this summer. It's also why there's a bill in our state senate as we speak that would give the state the right to CONTROL your thermostat.

Instead of admitting they tanked our grid as part of the green energy grift, Ms. Hochul is painting herself as a "savior from data centers" today.

This woman is also up for re-election in November. Her opponent, @NassauExec, is gaining traction on her while also outwardly proclaiming he is against ORES and what Hochul has done to our home rule.

@KathyHochul admitted for the world to see yesterday that she has the power to STOP and DISSOLVE the Office of Renewable Energy Siting at any time. But she won't. The kickbacks, foreign corporate deals, and subsidies and credits with solar and wind are worth the risk for her.

Thousands of acres of designated habitat, bald eagle nesting sites, state endangered species nesting habitat, wetlands, imperiled grasslands, and USDA prime farmland are locked up into ORES solar and wind contracts forced on our towns.

She doesn't care.

She's playing politics 101, painting herself a savior to a problem that our state can't support anyway. And it's all due to the 2019 Climate Act religion.

[Alex Fasulo @alex_fasulo]

When I decided one day in 2023 that I was going to teach myself how to farm and garden with zero background in growing plants whatsoever, it felt overwhelming.

It still feels overwhelming most days.

I started reading as many books as I could. Most of them made everything feel even more complicated.

And then one day in 2025 I sat in for Martha Stewart’s talk she gave in NYC. It changed me. She spoke about how it takes a lifetime to become a master gardener or farmer. Don’t rush it. Focus on one or two things you get very, very good at in a grow season. Save the rest for the next year.

After that talk, I started to have fun with learning the art of farming. I think about that talk a lot. I read her entire gardening handbook. It’s the only book I use now at my own farm.

Getting to tell her about my small farm yesterday was amazing. But getting to tour her gardening empire was even cooler.

Here are some pics and videos from her estate. I adore how well she takes care of her animals. The second I see someone care for animals in that way, I know I am going to like them.

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 WOW. Nick Shirley just went on national television and dropped this revelation: The Chinese and Korean Mafia is LOOTING MEDICAID and running a kickback scheme in NYC

"In Queens, adult daycares [have] pharmacies set up, it's this big racket where they BILL all these people with medical beneficiary numbers from seniors in the adult daycares. They make so much money from Medicaid, THEY GIVE KICKBACKS to the seniors."

"So you have these Korean and Chinese mafias, quite literally, looting the government from Medicaid, and then giving the kickbacks to the seniors!"

INGRAHAM: "So wait, the old people get the money themselves?"

SHIRLEY: "Well, they make so much money, these pharmacies and these little daycares, that they then have a referral program set up for these seniors."

"So it's like bringing a friend will give you a hundred bucks."

@nickshirleyy

[🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 @Real_RobN]

Here it is:

A father: “Here’s what I need you to do. When I tell you this story, think about your kids.

Alexander Devonte Dickie was arrested 39 g’damn times.

Thirty-nine crimes in ten years. Twenty-five felonies. Can anybody explain to me how he could possibly be on the street?”

You’ve got to start charging Democrats and their activist judges for murder.