É nítida a semelhança entre a esquerdomacharia e bolsominions. TODOS se comprazem da objetificação dos corpos femininos. O que o patriarcado quer de nós? Até meados do século XX, diziam para nos cobrirmos; hoje incentivam o contrário. Por que? Para que? Para quem?
@AndreAragao666@JanaDahoui Ora ora, chegou mais um! Que surpresa! Para que serve a crítica sociológica, n��o é mesmo? Para que pensar a objetificação dos corpos femininos, se ela tanto agrada a essa nobre comunidade esquerdomacha, não é mesmo?
Mas Enquanto O BRASIL TEM O SUS, Esse Homem Dos Estados Unidos VAI DEIXAR DE COMER Por Um Dia Para Poder Levar Sua Mãe Ao Médico, JÁ QUE O Trump Prefere GASTAR BILHÕES DE DÓLARES PARA APOIAR Israel No GENOC��DIO E ATACAR O IRÃ
@chaneldifiori@Phileopi@Gustavramski_@tabataamaralsp Quem acusa deve provar. Não é um conceito difícil de se entender. Vc supõe que esse casal era terrorista sem saber absolutamente nada a respeito dele. Mas confia num estado militar vil e genocida.
@chaneldifiori@Phileopi@Gustavramski_@tabataamaralsp Você obviamente não compreende o conceito de "ônus da prova". Quem acusa deve corroborar sua acusação. Os acusados devem ter a possibilidade de demonstrar sua inocência e não serem executados sem direito a absolutamente nada. Vê-se q vc não tem o mínimo respeito pela vida alheia.
Não maltrate o gambá! Ele é dócil e importante. Sua função no ecossistema: controla pragas (come carrapatos, baratas, ratos e escorpiões), limpa restos de animais mortos e ajuda a dispersar sementes. É um "faxineiro da natureza" e ainda é resistente à raiva.
> be Alexandra Elbakyan
> be born in Kazakhstan in 1988
> start coding at 12
> hack your internet provider at 14
> hack MIT Press at 16 to download neuroscience books you can't afford
> get a CS degree from Satbayev University
> intern in neuroscience at Georgia Tech
> speak at Harvard on brain-computer interfaces
> notice researchers can't read the papers they need
> notice academic publishers charging $30 a paper
> notice peer reviewers worked for free
> notice editors worked for free
> notice universities funded the research with billions of dollars of public money
> build Sci-Hub in 2011
> upload nearly every paywalled research paper ever published
> give it away for free
> get sued by Elsevier
> get hit with a $15 million judgment
> don't give a flying f*ck
> keep Sci-Hub up
> get domain after domain seized
> register a new one
> keep Sci-Hub up
> get investigated by the US Department of Justice
> don't give a flying f*ck
> get accused of working for Russian intelligence
> don't give a flying f*ck
> have the FBI subpoena your iCloud
> get named one of Nature's ten people who mattered in science
> get a parasitoid wasp named after you
> get a deep-sea snail named after you
> get the Electronic Frontier Foundation Award for Access to Scientific Knowledge
> become a legend
🚨BREAKING: Two researchers from UPenn and Boston University just published a paper that should be uncomfortable reading for every CEO automating their workforce right now.
The argument is straightforward. Every company replacing workers with AI is also eliminating its own future customers. Laid off workers stop spending. Enough of them stop spending and nobody can afford to buy anything. The companies that fired everyone end up selling into an economy with no purchasing power left.
Every executive can see this. The math is not complicated. But here is why nobody stops.
If you do not automate, your competitor does. They cut costs, lower prices, take your market share, and you collapse anyway. So every company automates knowing it is collectively destructive because the alternative is dying alone while everyone else survives. The researchers proved this is a Prisoner's Dilemma playing out in real time.
The numbers are already moving. Block cut nearly half its 10,000 employees this year. Jack Dorsey said AI made those roles unnecessary and that within the next year the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion. Salesforce replaced 4,000 customer support agents with AI. Goldman Sachs deployed a coding tool that lets one engineer do the work of five. Over 100,000 tech workers were laid off in 2025 and AI was cited as the primary driver in more than half those cases. 80% of US workers hold jobs with tasks susceptible to AI automation.
The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income does not change a single company's incentive to automate. Capital income taxes adjust profit levels but not the per-task decision to replace a human. Collective bargaining cannot hold because automating is always the dominant strategy.
They also identified what they call a Red Queen effect. Better AI does not solve the problem, it accelerates it. Every company chases faster automation to gain market share over rivals but at the end everyone has automated equally, the gains cancel out, and the only thing left is more destroyed demand.
The one thing the math says could work is a Pigouvian automation tax. A per-task charge that forces companies to account for the demand they destroy each time they replace a worker.
The conclusion is that this is not a transfer of wealth from workers to owners. Both sides lose. Workers lose income. Companies lose customers. It is a deadweight loss with no market mechanism to stop it on its own.
(Link in the comment)
@FT This is the city in question. People in FT are insane. Yes, there is crime: as there is crime in NY, LA, Chicago or Detroit, (or London, LOL). Come to visit, one of the best beaches in Brazil and the food is amazing!
You are using a photo from 2019, from the government whose president was imprisoned by the Brazilian justice system (something you haven’t been able to do with Trump). On top of that, you invited someone who was part of his corrupt government to give an opinion, as if his word had any credibility. Do you think we’re stupid and can’t recognize when the media is trying to create narratives to support a government intervention?
Imagina seu filho estudando nessa escola cívico-militar… Primeiro dia de aula com erros de português graves assim. Assiste aí e me diz qual sua opinião sobre isso. 🫣
Mas É O LULA Com O Príncipe William E O Keir Starmer, Primeiro-Ministro Do Reino Unido, Em Belém.
E Há Ainda Quem Acredita Que ESSE LÍDER GIGANTE DO BRASIL É Um "Anão Diplomático"?
Mas E O Flávio Bolsonaro Sendo DESMENTIDO AO VIVO Pelo Senador Otto Alencar, Quando Disse Que Seu Pai Nunca Tentou Impedir A CPI Da COVID?
"Foi A Única Vez Na Minha Vida Que Eu Tive AMEAÇA"
🚨EXCLUSIVE: I stopped by a food bank to see Rep. Jamie Raskin.
He was there quietly making sure they had enough resources to feed insecure Americans without SNAP or federal paychecks.
I hope every American sees Democrats are working while Republicans are at Gatsby parties.