Wendy S # Never give up your privacy and freedom

Cannot abide MSM. Script readers for the government

[OffGuardian @OffGuardian0]

There is no way to prevent children from taking naked pictures that doesn't include one or more of the following:

1. Registering your age and ID every time you buy an electronic device.
2. Letting third-party software scan everything you attempt to take a picture of.
3. Letting the government or some other agency view all your photos.

This will apply across the board, to everyone, if they pass those rules.

[Bev Turner @beverleyturner]

You can tell from his eyes that he hasn't read this speech before.... he thinks he is delivering good news but even he quicklt realises he can't sell this.

The uk simply CANNOT support #data centres. We do not have the energy or water required. The USA is struggling - and they have a lot more space, power and water!!

And as usual, no journalists are asking the right questions. @GBNEWS would - but we are rarely allowed to get close enough.

[BuildTheDumb @probettinglab]

@ukhomeoffice Like Starmer tried to get rid of disappearing whatsApp messages, then used them himself with half the cabinet. Your a joke it wont work.

[Wendy S # Never give up your privacy and freedom @kevinptrpn]

@ukhomeoffice Nothing to do with protecting kids, and the majority of the public know it. You can stick your digital ID where the sun doesn’t shine.

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

🚨WARNING the bit Starmer isnt telling you is... this sort of device technology is called Client-Side Scanning.

It is already built into the Ofcom regulated Online Safety Act through “accredited technology” notices. The EU has been pushing similar rules through its Child Sexual Abuse Regulation, known as “Chat Control”.

It basically means phone companies and platforms can be pushed to scan messages, images and content BEFORE you send them, then either allowing them to be sent or blocking/reporting them.

Once the precedent is set, "to protect children", it can easily be widened to block whatever government decides is “harmful”.

And that's how you go from child safety to state approved speech.

TA DAAAA 🚨

[Wendy S # Never give up your privacy and freedom @kevinptrpn]

@ShabanaMahmood Stop lying, we all know it’s about people linking up and finding out the truth about you evil globalists. You won’t stop us. MSM and you puppet politicians are finished. The games up.

[Tony Ward @TonyWard867811]

Most people still think a bank lends out other people's deposits.

It does not. The day you signed your mortgage, the bank did not reach for anyone's savings.

It typed the money into a screen. It did not exist the moment before.

They made it, there and then, out of nothing.

Then they handed it to you, and you spent the next thirty years paying it back with the one thing nobody can type out of nothing.

Your time. Your work. Your one life.

Thirty years of early starts. Of missed weekends. Of dragging yourself in when you were spent.

To repay money they conjured in an afternoon.

They created theirs with a keystroke.

You repay yours with your life.

That is the deal. And they have the nerve to call it owning a home.

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

Starmer is utterly deluded.

Here he is thrilled that the Unilever site in Warrington which closed with 140 job losses is being replaced by a 260,000 Data Centre …

which will employ about 40 people in total, many remotely.

Datacentres will NOT solve growing unemployment, they will only help increase it.

[James Melville 🚜 @JamesMelville]

No one voted for this. Starmer is ramming through massive AI data centres earmarked in communities around the UK - and putting energy and water supply at risk. He’s giving power to the tech giants and taking away power from the people.

[Right over Left Everytime @RightSide_Uk]

Keir Starmer is set to impose internet restrictions on millions of Britons within days.
What will that mean for our ability to log into X?
Elon Musk bought X to save freedom of speech.
Starmer is trying to control us.
This is not about protecting children. This is about silencing dissent, monitoring every word, and turning the internet into a state-approved echo chamber.
The same regime that jails people for tweets now wants to gatekeep the entire web.
They fear the truth spreading.
They fear you speaking freely.
They fear X.
We will not comply.
We will not be silenced.
Starmer’s digital prison will fail.
The British people will find a way to speak — no matter what restrictions he imposes.
Freedom will not be surrendered without a fight.

[Silkie Carlo @silkiecarlo]

You’re not being honest with the public @ShabanaMahmood

Yes, tech companies could “switch on” a child lock for every UK adult - but parents can already just switch it on for their kids!

Your plan means the population must show ID to stop your child lock being put on our phones

[Ranty Man @RanTeeThree]

Imagine for a moment that the government introduced legislation that said you needed to produce ID for you to be allowed out of your house and explained that it was to protect children.

That's what Starmer is proposing for the Internet.

[Darren of Plymouth @DarrenPlymouth]

"it is for the safety of the children... of course it is"

Keir Starmer is expected to restrict Britain's roughly 13 million under-16s from accessing 'high-risk' platforms.

TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, YouTube, and of course X, will all be blocked without some sort of identity verification.

Clown Starmer calls it an 'Australia + model', whatever that means.

Yet he wants to lower the age of voting in elections to 16 years old... make that make sense.

How are 16 year olds supposed to make informed decisions ,when they are unable to access information and news that gives them a rounded view on the world they live in?

The reality is, this is one of the many stepping stones to a digital ID system, we will all have to prove that we are over 16 years old, we will all have to prove who we are so that we can take advantage of the services offered to us in this connected society, buy, sell, be tracked, be monitored. They want to know the very essence of who you are.

Dissent will not be allowed.

Time is running out people, we must not comply, we must fight back, 2030 is a deadline.

Remember The World Is Ours, not theirs.

[ADAM @adamemedia1]

JUST IN: 🚨 🇬🇧 Spyware is to be activated on all British phones

You must give your ID to the government and tech platforms to prove you are not a child (if you believe that 🤡)

And they can see and analyse every picture and video on your phone.

Privacy is a thing of the past.

[Fiona Rose Diamond @CoviLeaks]

The digital dystopia isn't a future warning, it's already here, and this is just another opening attack. While the entire UK was glued to the hypnovision, house-trained to scream over flags and immigration rows, the trap was quietly sprung right under your noses.

Once again, you were successfully divided, systematically blinded, and utterly conquered by manufactured outrage. Now the distraction is complete, the cage is locked, and you will be completely, permanently controlled.

Well done folks!

Under the Children's wellbeing and Schools Act, the Secretary of State faces a hard, statutory deadline to report on the exact implementation progress of these regulations by 29th July 2026.

The government announced that the formal measures and platform blocks 'restricting under 16s' will be brought into full force by the end of 2026.

To use social media, all tech companies will force us to hand over a selfie and identity documents to a third-party verification company.

Because tech companies face massive fines if they get it wrong, they will force every single user through these checks to protect themselves.

For an adult who just wants to log on to the web, the outcome is identical: you cannot have internet access without proving who you are first.

To make an 'under 16 ban' actually work across the web, internet service providers (like BT, Sky, and Virgin Media) or device manufacturers (like Apple and Google) would have to install a permanent gate at the connection level.

The internet becomes blocked by default, for everyone.

It is here. We had a chance to stop it, yet millions were successfully distracted and divided by bullshit political theatre and false fucking idols.

The morons bought the lies, hook, line, and sinker. They even cheered for their own digital enslavement.

My patience with these cattle is dead, to be honest. But they'll still want saving when they realise just how dire this is...

It's another 'we told you so'... again.

And the comments below posts like this are always the same: 'I am not giving X my ID.' 'I am not giving Facebook my biometrics.'

Well done. We all have our red lines. But do you seriously think it stops there? Do you really plan to never log onto the internet again? This isn't just about social media verification. This is a total digital lockdown. You either scan your face for a private tech company, or you are completely cut off.

And that's just the prelude to the digitisation and tokenisation of life itself, and the GovUK Wallet that will be forced upon you.

Stop blindfolding yourself. This isn't a 'safety measure' or simply data-harvesting, it is the absolute foundation of a complete digital control grid. THAT IS WHAT ALL THIS IS FOR!!!

They intend to make life impossible without your Digital Wallet.

And when I ask how do we communicate at scale or campaign without the internet, or how we fight back at scale, I get the same lazy, low-effort answers: 'Set up a community.' 'Meet on Sundays.' 'Start a group chat.'

We have been doing that exact same routine for six years. We don't need more endless chatting in parks with 10 people on Sundays...

We need to inform, and we need to organise. Fast.

And while I'm at it (I'm sure I'll get hate for this but I couldn't care less); if you think you'll beat this by quoting medieval law and claiming to be a 'living man' or 'living woman' - you are completely delusional.

The algorithm, the state, the parasites and satanic globalists do not care about your freeman-on-the-land scripts. A biometric gate on the edge of your geofenced 15-minute town or city will not open for sovereign citizen speeches. It is completely useless against the dystopian digital panopticon, and simply demonstrates you are completely oblivious to what we are actually facing off here.

You either stand and strike back - now, or you accept your enslavement. The choice is yours.

Personally - I've done enough of the peaceful protesting; it's time to get creative...

[Big Brother Watch @BigBrotherWatch]

🚨 BREAKING: Keir Starmer threatens mandatory ID checks to use mobile phones

"Protecting children online is vital, but these are outrageous plans that will fail to address the underlying causes of online harm. This will only result in population-wide ID checks for all of us to use our phones, tablets and laptops.

"Put simply, the Labour Government is threatening ID checks for the internet. No one in a democracy should need to show their passport just to get online.

"These plans would replace efforts for meaningful tech and parental responsibility with performative, authoritarian government control that children can easily circumvent by accessing adult-registered devices. However, for the UK's 50 million adults using the internet, this backdoor digital ID requirement would invoke the death of anonymity and internet privacy.

"The Government's plan very likely means that unless you submit to intrusive identity checks when setting up your phone or computer, there will be a chokehold on your software and internet access leaving you with a child-locked device. Planned restrictions on messaging, streaming and browsing raise the potential of spyware in our pockets that will be exploited for other purposes before long.

"The Government mandating that all phones in Britain require ID and surveillance software is a crossing of the Rubicon that would make the UK one of the most authoritarian internet regimes in the world. This extreme technological censorship requires rigorous public and parliamentary scrutiny that is currently totally missing" - Silkie Carlo | @silkiecarlo

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

Say No to Digital ID

[Together @Togetherdec]

"Privacy is power - and they don't want you to have any"

@Snowden

[Gareth Icke @garethicke]

Just another day in the not so United Kingdom.

Full show streaming now on https://t.co/rhA0Zj4o4j

[No to Digital ID @NoToDigitalID]

A unified Digital ID, with a weak infrastructure, in the era of mass data leaks?

What could possibly go wrong.

Say NO to digital ID