@Codesorcerdev41@josebikeri@Asamoh_ Exactly, as if we were not in this country when π― transition was being implemented, yet infrastructures are not being built, remember the cbc upgrades that were never done?
@weak_spell@Nyarariiiiii You remember GOK policy on 100% transition? But guess what the facilities are infrastructures are not upgraded. The effect is alot of students less accomodation spaces. And that's how they end up sleeping on hallways.
@WambuguKanyi@Billionair1w Lastly, assuming the clearance was sufficient for the cargo to pass however powelines crossings were cutting across the road, should we allow the transporter risk the lives of people with electricity for simply not carrying out a route plan?
@WambuguKanyi@Billionair1w Still not an excuse for transporters who didn't route plan and seek approval, what happens when you reach the bridge and read the sign and realize your cargo is higher than the limit? Do you make a U turn? That's a risk transporters shouldn't be exposed to.
@WambuguKanyi@Billionair1w KeNHA has all bridges mapped out also mapping a route not only include bridges but power lines crossings and road widths anytime you are dealing with cargo whose height exceed a normal container trailer, dimensions and route planning ought to be done.
@WambuguKanyi@Billionair1w I agree they have normal dimensions, but there's an aspect of route planning approval the bridge at blue post is among those with low clearances. If you can remember that boat that was headed to Uganda a while back had its route pre planned and approved and there were no issues
@WambuguKanyi@Billionair1w But do you know such trucks are required to go for dimension checks and route approvals? This is a case whereby a transporter avoids laid down procedures because if they followed correct guidelines that route would be out of option. KeNHA has the dimensions of bridges in network.