kimmitzer

kimmichism

[Yuri @yurialb1910]

Alemanha ganhou Copa do Mundo:

- Em cima da Hungria do Puskas
- Em cima da Holanda do Cruyff
- Em cima da Argentina do Maradona
- Em cima da Argentina do Messi

Aura. Muita aura.

[kimmitzer @Kimmichism]

@idrwalerts epic bullshit

[kimmitzer @Kimmichism]

@FabrizioRomano paid bot

[kimmitzer @Kimmichism]

@keshavbedi @IndianExpress @DrMohanYadav51 this guy is pretending as if Dr Mohan yadav is a pious person, bro there are numerous ways these transactions are done so that they appear to be plausible and correct but in reality mostly are bought either through muscle power or benama to self transactions

[kimmitzer @Kimmichism]

@pwdbhakt @chalotweetkaro @advsanjoy another nonsensical bot have arrived

[kimmitzer @Kimmichism]

@jareen66 @advsanjoy AI has hallucinations and its proven, sorry mate

[kimmitzer @Kimmichism]

@CJP_for_India insaan ki zindagi

[VIE @perfectionviera]

People keep saying Germany isn’t what it used to be

Meanwhile Germany in 2016:

[kimmitzer @Kimmichism]

this is one hell of a trick to use against Arsenal next season @vincent

[Roger Bonet "Ruxi" @Ruxiiii4]

Argentina attack low blocks with Messi and Thiago Almada operating between the lines.

Germany attack low blocks with Musiala and Wirtz between the lines.

France attack low blocks with Dembélé and Olise between the lines.

Spain attack low blocks with Pedri and Dani Olmo between the lines.

England, on the other hand, are attacking a low block with Rice and Bellingham operating between the lines.

This isn't a criticism of England or of those players. It's simply a reflection of their profiles. Rice and Bellingham are excellent players, but neither is naturally suited to consistently receiving in tight spaces, turning under pressure, combining quickly, or playing incisive through passes in the final third. When they do, it's more the exception than the rule.

In games where England are expected to dominate possession and face a deep defensive block, players like Eze or Morgan Rogers can offer something different.

With the profiles England are using today, it makes more sense to optimize the attack around different strengths: creating crossing opportunities, dominating second balls through counter-pressing, and maximizing set-piece situations.

[kimmitzer @Kimmichism]

@JethmalaniM NDA and core values sounds like natural opposites cause there ain t no philosophy running the party there is just one man calling the shots and the rest follow the orders like a sheep so i don't understand what you're trying to say here

[kimmitzer @Kimmichism]

@tishasaroyan so it's the fault of the parents of the girl but it's never the fault of the girl right

[kimmitzer @Kimmichism]

@rishibagree nit picky - cause if single replies decide the narrative then maybe people can also prove that hitler won the ww2

[kimmitzer @Kimmichism]

@advsanjoy you are propoganda machine so stay in your lane m8

[kimmitzer @Kimmichism]

@KunwarJais3333 @dr__gk @ThePuneMirror nice

[kimmitzer @Kimmichism]

@chalotweetkaro @advsanjoy thanks man 4 debunking this BS

[kimmitzer @Kimmichism]

@Swapzz6 @advsanjoy common knowledge for who smart ass

[Shubh @kadaipaneeeer]

scenes from cabinet meeting at mohan yadav’s residence

[kimmitzer @Kimmichism]

@advsanjoy thanks for proving mah point

[kimmitzer @Kimmichism]

@akshtanilabh Hindus ko ab ram mandir mai paisa nahi dena chahiye

[Nav Toor @heynavtoor]

A student submitted an essay she wrote by hand. Her university ran it through an AI detector. The detector said she cheated. She is autistic.

Her name is Moira Olmsted. Adelphi University. February 2026. Turnitin flagged her essay as 100% AI-generated. She was disciplined.

Two other AI detectors classified the same essay as human-written.

She sued. She won. The court called the school's decision "arbitrary and capricious."

She is not the only one.

In May 2026, a high school student in Palo Alto was expelled after an AI detector flagged his work. He faced visa revocation. He filed a federal civil rights lawsuit.

A researcher at Griffith University just proved mathematically why this keeps happening. The paper is on arXiv. The finding is one sentence.

AI text detectors have a structural flaw that no amount of better engineering can fix.

Here is what the math says.

If a university wants its detector to catch 80% of cheaters, at least 750 out of every 10,000 innocent students will be wrongly accused. That is not a software problem. It is a theorem.

If the university tries to limit false accusations to 1%, detection power collapses to 6%. It catches 6 out of every 100 AI-written papers. The other 94 get through.

There is no setting where the detector is both fair and effective.

The reason is diversity. Every student writes differently. Non-native English speakers use simpler vocabulary. Shorter sentences. Clearer structures. So does AI. A Stanford study found that 61.3% of TOEFL essays written by non-native English speakers were misclassified as AI-generated. A separate analysis tested 14 commercial detection tools. Zero out of 14 reached 80% accuracy.

The students most likely to be wrongly accused are non-native English speakers, neurodivergent students, and anyone who writes with clarity and precision. The qualities that make their writing effective are the same qualities the detector mistakes for a machine.

Vanderbilt University understood this. They disabled Turnitin's AI detection in 2023 after calculating that even a 1% error rate across 75,000 submissions would produce 750 wrongful accusations per year.

750 students accused of cheating for writing like themselves.

The paper's conclusion is not that we need better detectors. It is that the diversity of human writing itself makes accurate detection mathematically impossible.

The same thing that makes your writing yours is the thing that gets you accused.

https://t.co/L91ldtXP05