As per NCRB 2024:
Total crimes in India =58,85,867
Crimes against SC/ST=65,664 (1.12%)
Means 98.8% crimes are against non-SC/ST in India.
So, who needs more concern??
🚨Bro
You know where Brahmin & GC hatred come from?
The schools of RSS! I am not joking bro, see this image from Class 7 textbook of Vidya Bharti, an RSS affiliate!
What do you see, bro? A Brahmin being crushed to pieces!
Hello Everyone.
Request everyone to check their children's textbooks & read it once (esp history, hindi, literature, social science).
If you find any problematic anti-hindu, anti-GC, anti-brahmin content, please tag the education ministry & govt officials & ask for answers.
I have checked a few & am shocked at content being taught (esp against GCs & brahmins).
Another point to note is that I can't find "hindu" references in many books, rather everything is referred to as "brahminical".
E.g. Brahminical rituals, brahminical texts, brahminical system etc, not Hindu texts or Hindu rituals or Hindu systems.
Has anyone also observed this?
Is this a pattern?
So the article's factual assumption is that child sex abuse is more likely or likelier in poor, non-general castes and religious minorities? I genuinely hope that's not the assumption.
"Razziya Sultan was a great ruler, highly trained in warfare, horsemanship, administration, diplomacy from childhood."
"Meerabai was tortured, oppressed by her in-laws, her guru was a 'dalit'."
-Written in NIOS Gender Studies Textbook from Senior Secondary
(Page 44-45)
The book glorifies Sultana Razia to the fullest. & There is no mention of any social evils of Islam in the paragraph. Sultana Razia comes out as a heroine of very progressive Islamic religion.
On the other hand, Meerabai is shown as oppressed, had to face evils of hindu society, her guru was dalit (this term didn't even exist at the time btw).
Reality?
-Razziya Sultan actually faced many hurdles from muslims, infact the powerful Turkic nobles (Turkan-i-Chehalgani or the Forty Amirs) & Muslim elite vehemently refused to accept a woman as their sovereign.
-Historical evidences show that prime minister (wazir)- Nizamul Mulk Muhammad Junaidi, along with several prominent Turkic provincial governors (including Malik Alauddin Jani & Malik Saifuddin Kuchi), refused to accept her and marched armies against Delhi.
But the NIOS text book doesn't mention any of these.
However, when it comes to Bhakti tradition & Meerabai, the textbook acquires a completely different tone.
Everything is linked to caste, Sati, patriarchy oppression of women. The book says Bhakti tradition led to the emergence of lower castes & women saints. However, this is totally contrary to the truth.
Much before the Bhakti tradition, saints emerged from across all varnas.
-Two greatest saints- Veda Vyasa & Valmiki are from the so-called lower castes.
-At least 27 women seers (Rishikas or Brahmavadinis), including Ghosha, Lopamudra, Gargi, and Maitreyi, are explicitly credited with composing sacred hymns & philosophical debates in the Vedas and Upanishads.
But the NIOS text book completely hides these obvious facts.
Thus the text book cunningly uses Meerabai for it's propaganda. Everything about Meerabai is about oppression, ill-treatment from her relatives & Rajputs.
The book says she accepted Sant Ravidas who was a Dalit as her Guru.
The term "Dalit" did not even exist during Meerabai's time & he had devotees from all sections.
The question also arises as to why the book goes into the identity like Meerabhai was a Rajput & Sant Ravidas is a Dalit, while it did not go into the details of whether Sultana Razia was a Shia or a Sunni or a Syed or a Ansari.
The book did not want Meerabai to be recognized for her gifted skills as it says that Meerabai's poems are not scholarly but only of emotions. The book's objective is to depict Meerabai as oppressed with no talent.
The book says that Meerabai wrote many poems on the ill-treatment she received from her husband while historical accounts say that Prince Bhoj Raj and she had a loving relationship.
When it comes to Meerabai, the text book use many non-definitive terms like "it is believed", "may not be", "seems to have" etc
but when it comes to Sultana Razia, everything about her was definitive, clear.
Why is social identity and oppression foregrounded when discussing Meerabai and Bhakti, but comparable religious and social context is largely absent when discussing Razia Sultan?
Because the book want the Hindu girls to associate Islam with Women's rise to power while Hinduism with caste, patriarchy & oppression.
Any commonsensical person can understand the impact that the above paragraphs would have on Hindu girls 15-16 year old Hindu girls.
It would clearly establish in their minds that Islam is a progressive religion which supports women to rise up while Hinduism, Hindu men, Hindu customs are oppressive which do not allow equal status to women.
Won't such books act as a means to brainwash young children, esp young Hindu girls to hate their religion & culture??
Wonder who wrote such books, how it escaped scrutiny and why it's is still allowed to continue.
@EduMinOfIndia
Please take note.
Been living in Lucknow for more than a year and all I can say is that it’s the best Tier 2 city in India.
>Safe
>Cleanest Air
>Third Cleanest City
>Great food culture
>Best roads in Uttar Pradesh
As for the waterlogging near Ambedkar Park, it had been raining continuously for three days. Once the rain stopped, the water drained away. (See video.)
The LDA and LMC work hard to keep Lucknow clean and beautiful. It’s painful to see politicians mocking such a beautiful city just to score political points.
Did you know about Rwanda Genocide?
-Rwanda schools before 1994 taught "Tutsis" were foreign invaders & "hutus" were moolnivasis.
-They used used ethnic quotas (reservations).
-They even forced kids forced kids to declare Hutu or Tutsi in class.
This early division of children into "us versus them" made later hate easy to spread.
& Later 8-10 lakh tutsis/moderate hutus were slaughtered by extremist hutus.
Today, the same pattern appears in India through Aryan-invasion stories, "Brahmanical patriarchy" lessons, reservations that limit general category students & official caste labels.
Classrooms and media keep repeating old grievances instead of shared values.
The thread warns India is following a similar path👇
Must read.
My favorite part about the Indian political climate is that it's really predictable.
It's all scripted. Currently, Navaratri is close by, so women's safety issues will be the focus.
Till Diwali, then it will be replaced by environmental issue.
Than in December minority stuff.
Do those women also include the TCS case victims, where you stayed mum and shared tweets from islamist account trying to whitewash it?
Larping as feminist accounts while supporting her male counterparts grooming and converting non muslim women lol.
Some people are saying that the posionous content against Hinduism & GCs were from old NCERT text books and they have changed everything.
Now let's see what NIOS board is teaching the students.
NIOS comes directly under Central Government of India.
Following extract is from page 41 of the NIOS Gender Studies text book, which is currently followed.
It says:
"Vedic texts like Smritis, Dharmasastras and Puranas subjugated women."
It agrees with Rahul Gandhi on Manusmriti.
It says that "women were considered impure in Hinduism."
& All these are taught to our school children.
So what Rahul Gandhi is saying in meetings, Central government is teaching the same to the Hindu students year after year.
❗️Directy from NIOS board website
Subject: Gender studies
Topic: The Age of Dharm Shastra
As per govt books,
- Dharma Shastras caused deteriorated women's status.
- Dharma Shastra encouraged child marriage.
- Women were considered impure.
This is being taught in Modi's yuga.
Text from Class 12 History Textbook (NCERT):
"Drona, a Brahmana, demanded Eklavya's (Nishad, a hunting community boy) thumb"
Qs:
-What do you think this story conveys to Nishads? To Kshatriya?
-Was Drona, as a brahmana, following Dharmashastra?
"Brahminical texts described Mauryas as low origin.
Buddhist texts described them as Kshatriya."
Clearly brahmins are being targeted, Buddhist text is being glorified, hindu texts are refered as "brahminical texts"!
And this is latest 2026-27 print.
Available on NCERT website.
"Vedic Hinduism had mindless ritualism & caste system. It oppressed women. Buddhism unleashed a new horizon of freedom for women & permitted them to get education."
-Written in Page 42, Gender studies (senior secondary), NIOS textbook
This is what is being taught to our kids👇
❗️Direct from NIOS Board Website
- Jauhar was an "evil practice".
- Rajput community is responsible for this evil practice.
In BJP govt, this is being taught to students.
Either BJP supporters should apologize to Swara Bhaskar,
or the BJP should apologize to the nation.
What the hell is this?! Swara B called Jauhar cowardice and this textbook is calling it evil?! People who protect themselves from rape, dishonor, slavery and necrophilia are “evil” while not a word will be said against those who actually were evil?! Giving in to rape is goodness? What kind of a world are we living in?
In past one week in India.
>Muslim Aashiq Ali killed his hindu GF in Assam.
>Muslim Aasif raped a girl in DU Delhi.
>Muslim Sarfaraz,Aarif burned a pregnant woman alive in Maharashtra.
>Muslim Md Farhat burnt LPU after a rumour in Punjab.
Low iq left - "Smash Brahmanical patriarchy"
"Durga Puja Bad reee"
@sadist_2003 "Unlike Boomers who get their misinformation from a Zuckerberg app, we genz are different, we get our misinformation from a different zuckerberg company.