米国のフェミニストの動画!
「生物学的性別の解体」を目論む勢力は医療産業複合体であり、女性の資源化⇒「テクノロジーによる生殖機能の支配」である!
「性別の解体」の狙いについて知りたい方は是非!
Jennifer Bilek | Who is Behind the TRANS AGENDA? https://t.co/L5H6ePCc9s @YouTubeより
“Gender identity” is often presented as a deep, innate psychological essence that exists independently of biological sex. However, the evidence for such a claim is far less clear than is commonly assumed.
At its most basic level, what is called “gender identity” can be understood as an individual’s perception, understanding, or subjective relationship to their biological sex. Neurologically, researchers do not directly observe a “gender identity” module in the brain. Rather, they identify statistical correlations between certain brain regions, networks, or patterns of activity and individuals’ self-reported feelings, beliefs, and experiences. This is no different in principle from studying political identity, religious identity, national identity, athletic identity, or any other self-concept. The fact that a mental state correlates with brain activity does not establish that it is an innate, biologically distinct entity.
The statement that “gender identity is in the brain” therefore risks overstating what neuroscience can actually demonstrate. Every thought, belief, preference, and self-conception is represented in the brain in some form. Saying that gender identity has neural correlates tells us little more than the fact that people think about themselves in sex-related ways.
At most, biological, developmental, psychological, and social factors may influence whether an individual feels comfortable with, identifies with, or rejects aspects of their sexed body. These influences are worthy of study. However, it does not follow that “gender identity” should be treated as a separate category that supersedes biological sex in law, medicine, or public policy.
Biological sex has direct physical, reproductive, and physiological consequences that are relevant in areas such as healthcare, sport, privacy, data collection, and scientific research. Any policy framework that elevates subjective identity above these objective realities bears the burden of demonstrating why such a departure is justified. Simply asserting that gender identity is real or that it has neural correlates does not, by itself, establish that it should take precedence over biological sex in legal or institutional decision-making.
"Another reason the field has done well in certain areas is that it was seen as controversial from the outset. To persuade people, evolutionary psychologists have often had to clear a higher evidential bar."
https://t.co/uOSKZjbyJi
What do all 19 of these images have in common? Child deprivation.
When two men or two women share a “birth photo,” there is always someone missing: a child’s mother or father.
- A man or woman they will long to know.
- One of the two adults most protective of and invested in them.
- The distinct maternal or paternal love that maximizes child development.
- Half of the answer to the question, “Who am I?”
False equivalence in marriage requires child loss.
That’s why we must #OverturnObergefell @MakeKidsGreater
https://t.co/6Q4Sp5sgEv
An Oxford professor has cancelled lectures following abuse and disruption by pro-trans protesters.
Associate Professor of Law Dr Michael Foran has been forced to cancel a series of lectures because of what he described as “escalating disruptive protests” by trans activists.
Dr Foran, an expert in equality law, was cited in last year’s landmark Supreme Court ruling which confirmed that, in law, the definition of a woman is based on biological sex rather than gender identity.
The lecture series, open to Oxford students and members of the public, explored themes from his new book, Sex, Gender Identity and the Law. Rather than engage with his arguments, a group of activist students chose to disrupt the events.
Dr Foran said: “This is deeply lamentable, but disruption has undermined the academic nature of this series.
“Students should not face bullying or harassment for attending academic events.”
He added: “It is unfortunate that these protesters have chosen disruption over genuine intellectual engagement grounded in academic charity and rigour. In attempting to shame students into de-platforming these lectures, they embody the antithesis of what a university stands for.”
At the first lecture on 29 May, two activists walked to the front of the lecture theatre and began addressing the audience as Dr Foran prepared to speak.
One protester claimed Dr Foran “masks his transphobia behind a thin veneer of academia”, adding: “If you are here in a critical capacity to challenge his ideas, that is not the same as refusing to platform him. He will not be convinced by your arguments. Please join me in walking out and refusing to platform this bigot.”
We are witnessing a growing crisis on university campuses, where academics and students face sustained campaigns of intimidation from activists unwilling to engage in debate.
While the University of Oxford says it is “committed to freedom of speech, academic freedom and respectful debate”, it must do more to uphold those principles.
Read more below 👇