I wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt by trying the steps provided in the video out myself. I am a complete After Effects noob, I have just used it for the first time. I asked Grok to give me instructions. Feel free to try it. Using frame 3 from the video, I will paste the original frame, the instructions in the video explained by Grok how to apply them, and end result I got (minus the color change), and the comparison that @BakersTuts
I end up with a near copy of the zap in the video. There is no fakery, the only fakery is you claiming @BakersTuts video is domehow disingenious.
Draw your own conclusions people. If I can recreate it, so can you.
Here's how difficult it is to match the pryomania shockwave to the MH370 satellite video. Feel free to recreate it yourself in After Effects if you'd like.
@LittleFish9305@AshtonForbes I used this one: https://t.co/m37i1flH6I
The video in the link you sent has like 4 pixels. Even your screenshot above look better than whats actually in the video on that archive link
@Nuzumaki@Genome_BLB@AshtonForbes maybe take 10 minutes and do the effects in after effects in frame 3 listed above. Then tell me it’s not a match instead of relying in something you read years ago.
I’m not sure you understand what I am talking about. I’ve never claimed faking the whole videos are easy or are done in 3 steps.
What others shown before me and what I recreated in After effects is that you can use 3 simple steps, on 2 different frames of the same stock video, to match the blast pattern in both mh370 videos.
If you are a “Truth Seeker”, that should be a major red flag for the authenticity of (at the very least) the so called zap in the videos being authentic.
Does that explain everything else in this case or even all the other details that can be fathered in these videos? no
Should you just ignore the fact that the zap in both mh370 videos can be matched to a single stock video? Well I think anyone objective enough should not.
@TheProjectUnity each and every one of them ‘remembers’ mire as time goes on.. which should make you question if any time they speak they are being truthful or not
I think its unlikely that the low res version is available in 2005, and that someone made a high res version of it after 2014 just to debunk the mh370 videos. That is infinitely less likely than the high res version just not being findable in the archive.
I had complete websites from that era that are not archived.
I have noticed that you moved on from your earlier stance that the blob of the zap is not in the shockwave video though. I could point out that you’re moving the goalposts, but I think I’ll just decide to be glad we’re making progress.
you forgot to add retard this time.
ye, a hoaxer manipulates the stock video to look like it actually belongs in the videos. it would be pretty stupid to put the shockwave video in the videos without altering them woukdn’t it?
Although you’d probably still be arguing they were real.
Are you implying that it is somehow then not relevant that the zap in both mh370 videos can be matched to different frames in this one stock video? because this ‘version’ of the video was uploaded on this site before 2021?
Does that then mean that you think it’s either:
a) a coincidence that the zap in 2 mh370 videos look the same as 2 frames in this video, or
b) this video was created FROM the mh370 videos uploaded with the hope that someone would figure out that the zaps can be matched to the mh370 videos, thus fake debunking them?
Am I missing an option C?
Would you not say it’s probably more likely that someone used the stock video to create the zaps in the mh370 videos?
@LittleFish9305@AshtonForbes I used this one: https://t.co/m37i1flH6I
The video in the link you sent has like 4 pixels. Even your screenshot above look better than whats actually in the video on that archive link
@AshtonForbes My response is below:
@AshtonForbes please response, I want to know if you change your opinion know I've shown the blob IS actually in the shockwave video.
https://t.co/tdSYv4ptWL
I wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt by trying the steps provided in the video out myself. I am a complete After Effects noob, I have just used it for the first time. I asked Grok to give me instructions. Feel free to try it. Using frame 3 from the video, I will paste the original frame, the instructions in the video explained by Grok how to apply them, and end result I got (minus the color change), and the comparison that @BakersTuts
I end up with a near copy of the zap in the video. There is no fakery, the only fakery is you claiming @BakersTuts video is domehow disingenious.
Draw your own conclusions people. If I can recreate it, so can you.
I wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt by trying the steps provided in the video out myself. I am a complete After Effects noob, I have just used it for the first time. I asked Grok to give me instructions. Feel free to try it. Using frame 3 from the video, I will paste the original frame, the instructions in the video explained by Grok how to apply them, and end result I got (minus the color change), and the comparison that @BakersTuts
I end up with a near copy of the zap in the video. There is no fakery, the only fakery is you claiming @BakersTuts video is domehow disingenious.
Draw your own conclusions people. If I can recreate it, so can you.
I wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt by trying the steps provided in the video out myself. I am a complete After Effects noob, I have just used it for the first time. I asked Grok to give me instructions. Feel free to try it. Using frame 3 from the video, I will paste the original frame, the instructions in the video explained by Grok how to apply them, and end result I got (minus the color change), and the comparison that @BakersTuts
I end up with a near copy of the zap in the video. There is no fakery, the only fakery is you claiming @BakersTuts video is domehow disingenious.
Draw your own conclusions people. If I can recreate it, so can you.