@ChoicelessBag@MoronMining .... objectivity. I can, personally with or without God say rape is bad and evil but without an objective source it just my personal opinion at the end of the day
@ChoicelessBag@MoronMining in a sense, yes as if morality is subjective, then any moral evil is just purely on what we as society personally and subjectively think is bad. And before you say , No if God was proven to not exist i would not think rape is fine, but it doesn't matter what i believe it about...
what you mean the militant state that is known for being a military with a state and a long warrior culture expanded via conquest.....nooooo. completely shocking
The "unification" of Germany 🇩🇪 by Prussia is one of the greatest lies in history: it was BRUTALLY ANNEXED trough wars of conquest and then TRANSFORMED by the Prussian system.
Though German lands already possessed a political framework in the German Confederation, the decisive question was what kind of Germany would emerge, and who would dominate it.
Prussia answered those questions with WAR.
In 1864, Prussia and Austria attacked Denmark over Schleswig and Holstein. The victory created precisely the territorial dispute that Bismarck could subsequently exploit against Austria.
Two years later came the decisive rupture.
In 1866, Prussia went to war not merely against Austria but against other German states. Bavaria, Saxony, Hanover, Hesse-Kassel, Nassau, Württemberg, Baden and others found themselves on the opposing side.
Prussia won in seven weeks. It then did something that the comforting language of ��unification” tends to obscure: it annexed German states outright.
The Kingdom of Hanover disappeared.
The Electorate of Hesse disappeared.
The Duchy of Nassau disappeared.
The Free City of Frankfurt disappeared.
Their rulers were removed, their sovereignty extinguished and their territories incorporated into Prussia.
That is not “unification” in the consensual sense of several states deciding to merge. That is conquest and annexation.
Austria was expelled from German affairs. The old German Confederation was destroyed. In its place Prussia created the North German Confederation, whose constitution institutionalized overwhelming Prussian power. The King of Prussia became its president; Bismarck became its chancellor; Prussian military power formed the backbone of the new system.
Prussia had destroyed the previous German political order and constructed another one around itself.
The southern German states remained outside it for several more years. They were sovereign kingdoms and grand duchies with their own governments, armies and political traditions. Bavaria in particular had a strong sense of separate statehood.
Then came the Franco-Prussian War of 1870.
The war created exactly the nationalist emergency in which the remaining southern states could be drawn into the Prussian system. Bavaria, Württemberg, Baden and Hesse-Darmstadt joined the new German Empire through treaties negotiated during the war.
And even then, the symbolism tells you what happened.
The new German emperor was not some neutral German monarch elected above the existing states. He was Wilhelm I, King of Prussia.
The imperial chancellor was Bismarck, the Prussian minister-president.
Prussia contained roughly two-thirds of the empire's territory and population. Its army dominated the imperial military system. Its king automatically possessed the imperial crown. Its political institutions were fused with those of the Reich.
The German Empire was therefore not simply Germany finally discovering its natural political form.
It was a Prussian solution to the German question, imposed after three wars and the destruction of Prussia's German opponents.
This distinction matters because the word “unification” quietly removes the losers from the story.
Hanover did not “unify” with Prussia. It was conquered and annexed.
Frankfurt did not vote itself out of existence. Prussia annexed it.
Hesse-Kassel and Nassau did not voluntarily dissolve themselves into a German nation-state. They lost a war and disappeared.
Austria did not peacefully decide that it was no longer German. Prussia defeated it and expelled it from the German political system.
Even the final empire was created only after another enormous war transformed the political conditions under which the southern states made their choice.
Saying only that “Prussia unified Germany” is rather like describing an acquisition without mentioning the hostile takeover.
Prussia defeated one German order, annexed several German states, excluded Austria, subordinated the remainder to a Prussian constitutional and military framework, and called the result Germany.
But this was only the first part of the problem. Now here's the second.
The older German world had been radically decentralized: kingdoms, duchies, free cities, ecclesiastical territories and regional societies had developed their own institutions and identities over centuries. Authority was dispersed and negotiated.
Prussia brought a very different tradition inherited from the Teutonic order: a powerful monarchy, an unusually strong bureaucracy, a privileged officer corps, military prestige, compulsory service and a state whose administrative capacity was exceptional by German standards. It was nothing but militaristic and administrative. Can you name a single Prussian composer, painter, writer, or artist of any kind? You can't. That's what I thought. BECAUSE THERE WAS NONE.
Prussian military virtues became increasingly identified with German national virtues: discipline, obedience, hierarchy, duty, administrative efficiency, sacrifice and reverence for the army and state. The officer acquired enormous social prestige. Military ceremony entered public life. The Prussian victory of 1870–71 gave this model the ultimate legitimization: it appeared to have created Germany itself.
That is the deeper significance of Prussian "unification": Prussia conquered Germany, built the Reich around its own institutions, and then spent decades teaching Germans to mistake Prussianism for Germanness itself.
Reminder there are multiple occasions of organize crimminal organization donationing to charities. This idea that oh i use the nisny i gain for good causes therefore the bad stuff i did is fine . Doesnt work sorry
@bigdaddy1bq@TheSylvar In there defense those wars were typically to gain more power and land and alliances when one bad harvest or winter could equal famime and especially back in those days habig as much kand as possibke was neccessary and beaides it was very much eat or be eaten back than
I doubt that yeah thwre would be Infighting but the Soviet union survived Stalin death nazi germany woukd survived hitler death. If nazi germany fall in a post ww2 axis victory i dont think it through civil war or something like that
I mean realistically, how quickly would the Third Reich have collapsed following an unexpected death of Hitler, given the intense internal power struggles and factionalism that characterized the Nazi leadership even while he was alive?
@K3brows@ShahFahmil@KatelynTweeter Um yes the biological purpose of sex is pregnancy. That just objective fact. Dont blame us blame nature . Thet why basically every religion push for waitig for sex till marriage because they recongize sex whether you want to or not made babies
@mdartfeld@PTGuy88@luvmyjaide The fact that you need to do all of those things just to prevent pregnancy further proves my point . the only way to effectively try to distance reproduction from sex is through artificial means and even than it not 100% effective.
@PTGuy88@luvmyjaide Also love the irony consent to sex isnt consent to pregnancy but aoso if a woman get pregnant when she didnt want to she should get an abortion. Weird i thought that if she consent to sex not reproduction she would just not get pregnant it almost like biology doesn't care
@PTGuy88@luvmyjaide Literally not true bro literally just not have an abortion
Actually you dont have one solution to the " problem"
Are personal objectives to sex is irrelevant to what sex biological purpose is.
@PTGuy88@luvmyjaide Really there are shit ton of woman each year you consent to sex and got pregnant despite bot wanting kids It's almost like biology doesn't give a shit about your stupid slogan
@PTGuy88@luvmyjaide no that taking the easy way out and murdering your way to a " solution" . also notice the dehumanizing language "let the problem grow, "correcting the child grow up to live a life.
simple biology, the purpose of sex is reproduction