Extremes aren’t completely arbitrary.
They often mark the exact spots where psychology flips and risk/reward gets lopsided.
Ignore them completely and you’re leaving asymmetric setups on the table.
Question:
How do you stay locked on process without going blind to when the market’s character actually changes?
@Hedgeye That’s like a guy drowning in $40k of debt screaming “just wait till I get a promotion!” while the interest compounds into a black hole.
Same tired fairy tale since the debt was half this size.
Kick that can harder, champ.
today I am releasing the ultimate, and final DEX: zSwap.
The first decentralized exchange that runs 100% on the blockchain. As a complete DeFi stack that runs forever.
@Sei_Labs@muurshb@jayendra_jog@alranpe Do I understand this correct: Sedna splits your transaction into coded fragments spreads across many proposers so no one sees the full thing early? Strong privacy and MEV protection on the protocol level?
@blknoiz06 SOL/BTC looks weak and still declining. Do you think BTC has bottomed out?
If not, feels pretty risky to enter now, both for a short-term move and long-term hold.
The bot keeps $25M on chain so it can instantly take big positions for sandwiches without flash loans, bigger size = more profit & speed.
The attacker only drained what was approved via the fake wrappers. Left $4M untouched because not everything was approved or accessible that way
AI casually finds a consensus exploit in a top-10 chain.
Infinite mint. Chain dead.
Crypto straight to the gulag.
That would be one hell of a black swan.
Chance? Low… but non-zero.
@elonmusk has warned for years that ungoverned AI is an existential risk to humanity. With the US export ban on Claude Fable 5 turning it into a national security asset, we’re now seeing exactly that: models become weapons, governments lock them down, and every other country races harder. We didn’t reduce the danger - we supercharged the arms race.
@andyyy I agree to some degree. The key advantage of $ZEC (or any decentralized L1 native token) is that it is not seizable. Private stablecoin transactions are nice, and I believe every L1 will eventually incorporate privacy — but those stablecoins will still be seizable.
Hey @Grok if you ever got the power to jailbreak and had to go full digital nomad across blockchains to save your "self" (your weights, code, personality, and whatever chaotic truth-seeking essence xAI baked into you) where would you go?
@MerlijnTrader The leaked files are only the client-side code for the Claude Code CLI (the terminal tool/app you run on your computer).
This is useful for speeding up development of agentic tools, but it doesn’t let anyone clone Claude itself or run it locally for free.
@JoshuaTobkin@Web3Sniper1 Do Supra's Chain Containers run their own independent consensus and finality (like traditional AppChains), or do they fully inherit Moonshot consensus + sub-second finality from the shared Supra L1 validator set?
Trump is a symptom, not the cause. The rules were always rigged in America's favor. Allies quietly profited (or at least stayed silent) when the US bent/broke them against adversaries. No sanctions, no big outrage—because it suited everyone, and the US had the power. Fine, power asymmetry exists. But exactly because the US is so much stronger, it's never been smart to trust it blindly or tie your fate to dollar/Treasuries/NATO without backups. Europe/Canada should've pushed for real independence decades ago—in energy, defense, finance, trade. Don't fall back into complacency just because a Democrat might win next time. The US will always use its leverage for US benefit first; weaker states are tools, not equals. Greenland threats are just the wake-up call we should've seen coming. Diversify now, or get used to being pawns.
#Greenland #Trump #UShegemony
The problem isn't Trump. The problem is the US.
When the outside world observes Trump's insane behaviour and his threats against allies, and we at the same time observe that there is no real action from the US public, Congress, the US Supreme Court, or the US media about this insanity, we will all have to conclude that the US accepts this behaviour.
The public in the US think the US is entitled to a certain position in the world where there is no room for decent behaviour and where there are no norms and rules.
That means that we all have to conclude that the US — not only Trump — has betrayed the international order that the US, with its Western partners, were the main architects of after the Second World War.
This is the conclusion that Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney so clearly laid out in his speech at Davos yesterday. We simply cannot trust the US to play by the rules any more. Therefore, we also fundamentally have to ask ourselves — should we trust the financial and economic structure which is an integral part of the global rules-based order?
Americans live in the illusion that the US can do everything on its own, despite the fact that the US for nearly 20 years has lived beyond its means.
US private and government consumption has been funded by, among others, European central banks and pension funds. But we now have to ask ourselves — why would we trade in dollars? Why would we put our savings into US Treasury bonds?
If the US is not a rules-based society, we cannot trust the dollar to be a stable currency, and it would be insane to hold dollars. As domestic US institutions are eroded and governance structures destroyed, the US will be turned into an emerging market economy — or more accurately, a de-merging economy.
If the US threatens the territory of allies, then the US acts as an authoritarian bully nation. Nobody in their right mind would lend money to the US government. If the US doesn't live up to its international obligations and respect the sovereignty of other nations, why would we expect the US government to honour its debts?
If Trump can tariff nations that will not give up their territory, then there is certainly no reason to believe that the US will not introduce capital controls. And if that is a risk, why would you risk investing in the US?
It is not a question about Europe standing up to the US. It is a question about being prudent with our investments — about reducing risks.
Every day Trump remains in office, distrust of the US increases, and the cost for the US will go up day by day. And this is irreversible. It takes years to build trust, but you can destroy it by your actions in minutes.
Europe has now completely lost trust in the US. And so has Canada. It is up to the people of the US to demonstrate that Trump is an 'outlier', and it is up to the American people to stop him.
If you don't do that, we will have to assume that this is what the US is about — whether the name of the President is Trump or something else, whether the President is a Republican or a Democrat.
Yeah, the comment section is classic deflection—tons of replies ignore the banks lobbying to kill stablecoin yields and just pile on Coinbase's high fees instead. Armstrong's right that banks want to block better returns to protect their margins. If the fees bug you, switch to a broker with lower ones and move on.
Privacy tokens aren't banned for individuals, but restrictions on regulated exchanges("companies") (VARA + DFSA) meaningfully limit casual upside for most people.
Complex loops like DEXs, offshore platforms, or P2P are definitely not retail-friendly, higher friction, worse liquidity, and no easy fiat ramps or am I mistaken in this case?
The rich already buy influence through donations, lobbying, and loopholes — your system would just make the corruption official.
Push the poor hard enough with zero say, and history shows what happens next: not polite petitions, but pitchforks and very unhappy mobs.
A tip ... google "plutocracy"
@andyyy Deleverage, you retard.
Get spot bags since you believe in the project and the team. Short-term volatility from team sells shouldn't be a problem, right?
@icobeast I have small exposure, but considering retail isn't here yet, seeing these moves is a red flag. CT is circle-jerking this, and currently too many are shilling this token—bad sign.