Here is:
The State Department: Tammy Bruce
Ninety percent of foreign aid never actually made it to its intended destination.
In other words, only about 10% is delivered properly; the rest is laundered and redistributed until it ultimately makes its way back to the back pockets of members of U.S. Congress.
📝 In other words, only about 10% is delivered properly; the rest is laundered and redistributed until it ultimately makes its way into the back pockets of members of the U.S. Congress.
LEAKED AUDIO: The most damaging part isn’t that conservatives called Alvin Bragg’s Trump case nonsense.
It’s that someone inside Manhattan’s legal world reportedly said it privately.
Fox News aired a segment citing leaked audio obtained by the New York Post, where a Manhattan public affairs official allegedly blasts the case against Trump and says Bragg was “stacking charges” and rearranging things just to make the case fit.
Then comes the line that says everything:
“I think the case is nonsense.”
Exactly.
This was never a clean, neutral pursuit of justice.
This was a weak legal theory stretched into 34 felony counts against the leading political opponent of the Democrat Party.
Even worse, the leaked audio reportedly points out what everyone in New York already knows:
Real estate and business people deal with paperwork and valuation disputes all the time.
Yet somehow, Trump is the one turned into a felony case in the middle of an election cycle.
So the real question is simple:
Was this justice?
Or was this selective prosecution dressed up as justice?
Because when prosecutors take behavior that is usually handled as a civil/business issue, stack charges around it, and aim it at one political target while ignoring everyone else, people are going to call it what it looks like.
The clip may not literally say “election interference.”
But when the leading opposition candidate is dragged through court, gagged, branded a felon, buried in legal costs, and hit with wall-to-wall media coverage during an election year, the implication is impossible to miss.
The process was the punishment.
The headlines were the weapon.
And now, according to this leaked audio, even people inside Manhattan’s own legal circles reportedly knew the case was nonsense from the start.
LEAKED AUDIO: The most damaging part isn’t that conservatives called Alvin Bragg’s Trump case nonsense.
It’s that someone inside Manhattan’s legal world reportedly said it privately.
Fox News aired a segment citing leaked audio obtained by the New York Post, where a Manhattan public affairs official allegedly blasts the case against Trump and says Bragg was “stacking charges” and rearranging things just to make the case fit.
Then comes the line that says everything:
“I think the case is nonsense.”
Exactly.
This was never a clean, neutral pursuit of justice.
This was a weak legal theory stretched into 34 felony counts against the leading political opponent of the Democrat Party.
Even worse, the leaked audio reportedly points out what everyone in New York already knows:
Real estate and business people deal with paperwork and valuation disputes all the time.
Yet somehow, Trump is the one turned into a felony case in the middle of an election cycle.
So the real question is simple:
Was this justice?
Or was this selective prosecution dressed up as justice?
Because when prosecutors take behavior that is usually handled as a civil/business issue, stack charges around it, and aim it at one political target while ignoring everyone else, people are going to call it what it looks like.
The clip may not literally say “election interference.”
But when the leading opposition candidate is dragged through court, gagged, branded a felon, buried in legal costs, and hit with wall-to-wall media coverage during an election year, the implication is impossible to miss.
The process was the punishment.
The headlines were the weapon.
And now, according to this leaked audio, even people inside Manhattan’s own legal circles reportedly knew the case was nonsense from the start.
LEAKED AUDIO: The most damaging part isn’t that conservatives called Alvin Bragg’s Trump case nonsense.
It’s that someone inside Manhattan’s legal world reportedly said it privately.
Fox News aired a segment citing leaked audio obtained by the New York Post, where a Manhattan public affairs official allegedly blasts the case against Trump and says Bragg was “stacking charges” and rearranging things just to make the case fit.
Then comes the line that says everything:
“I think the case is nonsense.”
Exactly.
This was never a clean, neutral pursuit of justice.
This was a weak legal theory stretched into 34 felony counts against the leading political opponent of the Democrat Party.
Even worse, the leaked audio reportedly points out what everyone in New York already knows:
Real estate and business people deal with paperwork and valuation disputes all the time.
Yet somehow, Trump is the one turned into a felony case in the middle of an election cycle.
So the real question is simple:
Was this justice?
Or was this selective prosecution dressed up as justice?
Because when prosecutors take behavior that is usually handled as a civil/business issue, stack charges around it, and aim it at one political target while ignoring everyone else, people are going to call it what it looks like.
The clip may not literally say “election interference.”
But when the leading opposition candidate is dragged through court, gagged, branded a felon, buried in legal costs, and hit with wall-to-wall media coverage during an election year, the implication is impossible to miss.
The process was the punishment.
The headlines were the weapon.
And now, according to this leaked audio, even people inside Manhattan’s own legal circles reportedly knew the case was nonsense from the start.
LAST NIGHT: Whoopi Goldberg Attacked Jack Keane — and Received a Brutal “Lesson” She Won’t Soon Forget
Whoopi Goldberg thought she could easily score public points by attacking Jack Keane over his views on patriotism, national unity, military service, and the direction of American culture. But this time, she picked the wrong opponent.
Known as one of America's most respected military leaders and public commentators, Jack Keane didn’t just respond — he delivered a powerful message about freedom of thought, personal responsibility, and respect for everyday Americans.
“Whoopi Goldberg says voices like mine are contributing to division,” Jack Keane began in a calm but firm tone. “But what truly divides a nation is dismissing people simply because they hold different beliefs and insisting that only one viewpoint deserves to be heard.”
And he didn’t stop there.
“You know what’s even more dangerous?” Keane continued. “Using influence and public platforms to shame millions of hardworking Americans simply because they refuse to embrace a particular cultural or political narrative.”
Then Jack Keane went even further, speaking as someone who has spent decades serving the country, advising national leaders, and working alongside service members and military families.
“It’s not disagreement that weakens a nation,” Keane said. “Strong nations survive disagreement. What weakens them is intolerance, contempt, and the growing belief that political opponents are enemies rather than fellow citizens.”
At that point, this was no longer just another public clash — it became a larger conversation about free speech, civic responsibility, and the future of public discourse in America. Instead of backing down, Jack Keane transformed the confrontation into a broader debate about the values that hold the country together.
“I’m not claiming to have all the answers,” Keane admitted. “But I will always believe that America is strongest when people can speak freely, debate openly, and still respect one another at the end of the day.”
And then came the line that many supporters said they would never forget:
“America was never built on fear of disagreement. It was built on courage, freedom, and the belief that people with different views could work together for something greater than themselves. So ask yourselves — who is really trying to unite this country?”
What began as a celebrity attack quickly turned into something much bigger: a message about unity, responsibility, leadership, and the future of America.
The rich seem TOO rich.
"$5 to you is like $6M to billionaire Jeff Bezos,” shrieks Sen Warren!
That’s why “TAX THE RICH” is popular.
But don’t politicians realize it’s been tried before?
It always FAILS. Here’s why:
Hey @FoxNews, How about focusing on what's happening in America?
Why no major coverage of DNI Tulsi Gabbard's recent declassifications exposing Fauci's role in funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, efforts to suppress the lab-leak theory, and contradictions with his congressional testimony?
That's a massive story for U.S. taxpayers and public trust — not UK politics.
Report the facts here at home. 💯🇺🇸 #Priorities
@WTAE This will continue until the police start making lots of arrests and putting people in jail. When there are no consequences for these teens there is no reason for them to stop causing trouble
@PittsburghPG Remember when the liberal running the center was making $1.4 million/year to run this non profit center🥸
Deborah Rutter, the former president who formally ran the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts until early 2025, made an average of $1.2 million to $1.4 million/yr
White House correspondent @kevincorke reports on the latest after former Olympian David Hearn was arrested for allegedly vandalizing the newly renovated Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in D.C.
Clint Eastwood:
"I love when people call Trump Stupid..
You mean the multi-billionaire who kicked every Democrats butt, buried 16 career Republican politicians, and continues to make fools out of once reputable news organizations ..
You mean the guy who won the presidency?
You mean the guy with the super model wife?
You mean the guy whose words alone put a massive slow down on illegal border crossings?
You mean the guy whose mere presence made the stock market smash its previous records?
You mean the guy who created 1 million jobs in his first 7 months in office?
Are you sure you even know what it is you're resisting?
Are you sure you back a party that enables the decimation of every core principal of Christianity?
Are you sure you back a party that voted 100% against the abolition of slavery?
Are you sure you really take a politician like Maxine Waters seriously?
Are you sure you don't see anything wrong with someone who has a 40 yr career as a public servant living in a $4.5 mansion representing a district."