@JethroSomes @MrAppVee @einarvollset@WalterIsaacson@martymadrid StarLink wouldn’t even be there if it wasn’t for the rich man… I’d be much more concerned if private citizens began using their power to change the outcome of wars.
@JdubAndrew@aman_kharbas@Rainmaker1973 Correct it’s not a carcinogen but it is connected to health issues. There is a lot of it in the ground but you don’t eat food or drink water off the ground everyday, even then the concentrations are very low comparatively.
@stupid8911@dandillondev@EndWokeness You do realize the original comment is commenting on her appearance in the second picture lol. That being said… you walked right into that one Dan 😝
@Lammington @Kim_Aldis @Hatchatorium @joeRaym94917800 @Figensport To be more specific water can’t be heated higher than it’s boiling point, which changes with pressure conditions.
@rpoo The problem is when places source water exclusively from aquifers. Some of those aquifers have a slow recharge rate. They can run dry for long enough to cause major problems. Eg San Antonio, or places in the Great Plains
@ylecun We understand how to make it and improve it but we don’t know what’s going on under the hood for a given response. The problem with the flying example is with ai, if it becomes significantly smarter than us before we solve the alignment problem the “plane crash” could be the end.
@mauricily@highbanditman@werdnAyelnaM@ShitpostGate True, the analogy is flawed there… but aren’t readings taken after the photons hit the surface… not interfered with from point a to b? Is the whole Von Neumann chain question not a thing anymore?