But the issue is you have to chat using Work in order to get the model selector to display. The model selector isn’t present in normal chat mode. You may find less people use chat for chat and the app using Work for chat and an iOS device to chat via the model picker. You have to use Work or browser not the native app. I think this one result in more people adopting Work.
@Tesco your new “show pin “option on the mobile app only shows the pin that was originally sent with the card initially. Meaning it’s showing the wrong pin if the pin has been changed by an ATM machine since it was initially issued.
So people have stated my negative reaction to resets being forced and not banked. I was on 80% remaining and 1 day until my natural reset.
Imagine you have an £80 gift card, and tomorrow you’re due another £100 gift card.
Instead, someone swaps your £80 card for a £100 card today and cancels tomorrow’s £100 card.
You’ve gained £20, but lost £100.
Overall you’re £80 worse off.
I think @OpenAI are trying to move to a single app that does everything and no real control or view of what’s going on under the hood. The app is called ChatGPT, then when you open it you choose option ChatGPT or Work. Isn’t work ChatGPT then? It say options “Chat only”, “Work”, “Coding”
@thsottiaux Is that a good thing?? Serious question - could that indicate that it’s being used less for engineering tasks? Engineers using alternative options?
Personally, I use cursor with OpenAI vs extension, with Claude VS extension, custom CLI for Jira automation and slack integration. I don’t use cursor’s own agent for building, I only use the cursor agents for live monitoring on all processes queued, pending and progressing. It also makes team collaboration much simpler. Everyone has their own setup preferences, that’s what works for me.
If you pace and schedule your usage then the resets work against you. If you burn through it all then they work for you. For people working in the professional field, managing their tokens and workload, it works against us. I’ve raised this a few times but isn’t taken on board.
When @AnthropicAI do a reset they keep your dates unchanged. So it can only benefit you.
@thsottiaux Please stop doing this, this actually works against people as you change the date too. If a person is more than half through their week but has more than half remaining, your reset is worse off. Please do banking or make it optional.
@melvynx So far, yes. Though, when a new model is released it’s great, then gets nerfed after the first week. It feel like GPT-5.6 Sol is worse than it was. That said, Fable is amazing still
My views on the current AI landscape from an engineering view, and the models I personally think are the best, in order:
Fable 5
Opus 5
GPT-Sol 5.6
Opus 4.8
These are the only models I use. If I want to use lesser/cheaper models, I’d still have one of the above models orchestrate things, but I’d state to use lesser models for the grunt work.
@mois_u Yes this is an issue actually. Something @AnthropicAI seem to have overlooked. If they are unwilling to provide banked resets then they should give you the option to opt out of automated resets
@JustinBleuel@ChatGPT An engineering version, just a single engineering powerhouse. Not the vibe version, but one that is geared for engineers. I’d like to move from CLI eventually…..
@rabbit_hmi This never quite survived the gruelling reviews it got in first launch. With @AnthropicAI releasing hardware, it’s an interesting time for personal devices
@cb_doge@JensenHuang Since the the huge volume of news and speculation when GPT was handing out resets and Fable was struggling with deciding on extending or not - X has become the place of AI new and conversation. Even zuck came here
I think vibe coders like to use voice, they just want a product, they care little about what’s going on under the hood. Swe on the other hand that are building and maintaining large code basis, internal AI training etc, need to follow what’s going on. Since @OpenAI got rid of codex I use a cli with a custom react ui/ux
I wish this had more engineering features, more focus on swe using this to build highly complex system. It’s feels like it going backwards in terms of removing tools and leaning harder on chatbot and voice. Starting to feel like a clever Amazon Alexa. Claude have an opportunity here if they are clever