@Cager_CA Thats fair, well outside of that I know a few people that daily drive different WL mice and aside from a battery issue which resulted in them sending out a new battery I've not heard of any widespread issues apart from this Beast launch
@Cager_CA Well, might be partly down to me not hearing of any issues from reviewers as you've mentioned. But I've had 3 WL mice with no faults and I've had 3 finalmouse mice all with faults. My opinion of the company has always been essentially finalmouse clones with better QC
@Winstonplayer1 My experience is usually the tanks being braindead. Constant over extending when it's not needed. Constant solo ults, always one tricks, 0 awareness
@fromsoftserve Because your idea of good optimisation is 60 fps. For most people on a competitive game is much higher. That game really doesn't run that well
@Fragil1ty@thundershock24@THQNordic Excluding any of these numbers, the 5090 on launch wasn't a major jump in performance from the 4090 but as of right now with mature drivers and synthetic benchmark runs along side game performance it's around 30-35%
@Davidplaysx89 This effects a lot of legitimate players.
I know a few people who don't even have that old of a PC and their fTPM versions are outdated with no new updates coming
@Fragil1ty@Khryn_Tzu@THQNordic Honestly, with it being single player. I don't mind frame generation that much. Depending on your monitor setup etc. 100 fps without framegen might feel worse than 200 with a little bit more system latency
@Fragil1ty saw me post a couple of pictures with fps differences on them. I'm seeing a variation of discussion about performance being either good or bad. I think it might just be more of a difference on systems, maybe CPU linked?
I mostly play fps games, on all low, high refresh rate so I do notice issues with frame pacing, latency and dips in range and 1% low's. I've not really had that so far in this game