SO WHICH IS IT? YOU CAN’T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS.
I’m being told that Danny Tommo can be charged with criminal damage because the French authorities had custody and control of the boat.
Right.
So let me get this straight.
If, in the eyes of the law, taking custody and control of that boat is enough to say it now belongs to the French authorities, then in my eyes you have opened up a much bigger question.
Because those same authorities are the ones dealing with these boats and the people on them.
And section 25 of the Immigration Act covers assisting unlawful immigration into the UK, with a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.
So if we are now saying that custody and control gives you legal responsibility for the boat, then where does that responsibility end?
Because if Danny Tommo is being accused of a crime involving a boat that nobody apparently owns, but suddenly that boat is considered to belong to the French authorities because they took custody and control of it…
then why aren’t the people who took custody and control of it being arrested and detained for people smuggling if they have assisted people in getting into the UK?
That is the question I’m asking.
You can’t tell me the boat is theirs when it helps establish criminal damage…
and then suddenly that responsibility disappears when we start talking about people being smuggled across the Channel.
If Danny is going to be held responsible for that boat, then why aren’t the people who supposedly have custody and control of it being held responsible for the people on it?
You can’t have it both ways.
So tell me…
When will we be arresting the French authorities
WHO ACTUALLY OWNS THE RESPONSIBILITY HERE?
@oldcatfartboss@Miranda05260842@georgedmadgwick Did you see the one on the news, who just binned his kid in the sea so he could get on the dinghy, and you 🤡🤡🤡 want to welcome that type scumbag, despicable people.
@oldcatfartboss@Miranda05260842@georgedmadgwick I'm not out on the street with my little sign, with my red hair & no job, screaming the scumbags are welcome as long as it's not near me. Pathetic
It’s right that a man has faced criminal prosecution for throwing a plastic bottle and swearing at police. But he got two years while an actual illegal migrant child sex offender got 12 months, was released by mistake then paid to go back to Ethiopia.