@GuyEnfield31944@pot_landia@cj_1234_cj@jemelehill This is why people should actually talk, the politicians and pundits have a financial interest in maintaining a dysfunctional political system. People have shit in common.
@cj_1234_cj@GuyEnfield31944@pot_landia@jemelehill I don’t care about premises, I care about how they’re actually going to do it. What that guy prescribed is more of a mechanism than anything in the Supreme Court ruling. Ideas are nothing without implementation. Real world implementation.
@cj_1234_cj@GuyEnfield31944@pot_landia@jemelehill It’s like saying financial crimes won’t happen because we have laws against them. Anything can exist in premise. Like meritocracy, simply a premise.
@cj_1234_cj@GuyEnfield31944@pot_landia@jemelehill They don’t prescribe a mechanism for it, most of the Ivy League schools are saying they’re going to evaluate policy to meet the standards of the ruling.
@cj_1234_cj@GuyEnfield31944@pot_landia@jemelehill Because it persisted way after the civil rights movement, affirmative action wasnt vigrously enforced for the first ten years of its existence. Afterwards people tried to circumvent it.
@cj_1234_cj@GuyEnfield31944@pot_landia@jemelehill They say that. Just like before affirmative action the universities said they weren’t discriminating because they wouldn’t abandon the constitution. This was a lie.
@cj_1234_cj@GuyEnfield31944@pot_landia@jemelehill lol I’ve read it inside and out. As a history major you should know that the ruling is only as good as the enforcement. It needs an actual mechanism.