@dccommonsense Hegseth and Miller both sounds like they wrote their speeches or tweets with AI, with too many prompts like “make it sound cooler” or “make it sound more dramatic”
@jonfavs So he’s definitely using Grok to write these tweets, right?
Like, this is what you get when you prompt “make it sound more dramtic” too many times.
@StephenM So he’s definitely using Grok to write these tweets, right?
Like, this is what you get when you prompt “make it sound more dramtic” too many times.
@kfunk68065@RpsAgainstTrump Hegseth was hoping they could work it through military courts, but the argument falls flat. Ultimately it’s an infringement on nonactive service members constitutional rights, which is a civilian issue
@Goblue30@Naz_buffalo@DaveMyersBIB We won’t fork up for either of them. OL is thin in free agency. They’ll have suitors ready to pay a premium for them. Lots of $ already poured into the OT position and there is Ocyrus Torrence hitting FA next offseason to consider
@JackKennedy The use of Shakir has been odd over the past few seasons. ADOT vs QB rating since 2023 has been:
8.9; 133
5.5; 108
3.7; 102
He profiles as a slot, but was effective in the second level. Def an underrated player though
@EuropaActual@CamFantastic1@BillMelugin_ No, it’s a consistent and even application of the law. Selective application of the law is why administrative warrants are problematic. Luckily, judiciary warrants are an independent oversight for that
@EuropaActual@CamFantastic1@BillMelugin_ And that is “ends justify the means” logic. At that rate we do not need a constitution or judiciary, because those who enforce the laws are infallible.
@EuropaActual@CamFantastic1@BillMelugin_ ICE attesting that ICE knows they have probably cause is exactly the issue. And not because they’re ICE, but because those decisions can’t be made unilaterally. Same reason we have juries at criminal trials. The investigator can not also be judge.
@EuropaActual@CamFantastic1@BillMelugin_ The constitutional argument of the fourth amendment goes beyond the specific case at hand. You are entering an “ends justify the means” debate, which has a long history of being a problematic form of governance.
@EuropaActual@BillMelugin_ You can be unlawfully present and not have entered the country illegally. Neither can you tell by observation alone. Which is exactly why you would need probable cause. No oversight imminently leads to 4th ammendment violations of American citizens